实验动物与比较医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 347-354.DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2023.060

• 华东会议优秀论文展 • 上一篇    下一篇

供应商来源的实验大鼠和小鼠微生物监测结果分析:以复旦大学实验动物科学部为例

黄缨()(), 韦思羽, 蔡莉, 强苏静, 李冬婷, 丁玉强   

  1. 复旦大学实验动物科学部, 上海 200032
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-09 修回日期:2023-08-03 出版日期:2023-08-25 发布日期:2023-09-14
  • 作者简介:黄 缨(1974—),女,博士,高级实验师,研究方向:疾病动物模型与神经系统疾病发生机制。E-mail: ying_huang@fudan.edu.cn。ORCID:0009-0001-4460-431

Microbiological Monitoring Analysis of Laboratory Rats and Mice from Vendors: Department of Laboratory Animal Science of Fudan University as an Example

Ying HUANG()(), Siyu WEI, Li CAI, Sujing QIANG, Dongting LI, Yuqiang DING   

  1. Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2023-05-09 Revised:2023-08-03 Published:2023-08-25 Online:2023-09-14
  • Contact: HUANG Ying (ORCID: 0009-0001-4460-4311), E-mail: ying_huang@fudan.edu.cn

摘要:

目的 对供应商来源的实验大鼠、小鼠进行常规微生物监测,为实验动物设施科学管理提供重要依据,确保相关实验结果的可靠性。 方法 以复旦大学实验动物科学部为例,在2021年4月到2023年4月间,按照单纯随机抽样原则,对来自7家供应商的大鼠、小鼠进行微生物质量抽检。具体参照国家标准中SPF级实验动物必须排除的微生物指标及其检测方法进行。 结果 抽检动物的检测总合格率为80.36%。其中SPF级大鼠抽检合格率为52.63%,SPF级近交系小鼠抽检合格率为82.76%,SPF级远交系小鼠抽检合格率为86.67%,SPF级免疫缺陷小鼠抽检合格率为86.36%。检测不合格的细菌学指标集中在金黄色葡萄球菌、绿脓杆菌、肺炎克雷伯杆菌和啮齿杆菌H型,检出率分别为10.76%、3.16%、2.53%和0.63%。不合格的血清学指标为仙台病毒,发生率为2.53%。此外,除国家标准规定SPF级小鼠必须排除的微生物指标外,还在近交系小鼠中检测到阿米巴原虫和肠杆菌属菌株;在免疫缺陷小鼠中检测到产酸性克雷伯杆菌,检出率分别为1.15%、2.30%和4.55%。 结论 供应商来源的大小鼠动物中存在一定的病原体感染发生率,相关动物设施有必要强化实验动物微生物监测,确保接收和饲养动物的质量,这对提高实验结果准确性和保护实验动物从业人员的职业健康具有重要意义。

关键词: 微生物, 监测, 供应商, 实验动物质量, 大鼠, 小鼠

Abstract:

Objective Conduct routine microbiological monitoring of laboratory rats and mice from vendors to provide an important basis for the scientific management of laboratory animal facility and ensure the reliability of relevant experimental data obtained from laboratory animals. Methods Taking the Department of Laboratory Animal Science of Fudan University as an example, between April 2021 and April 2023, rats and mice purchased from 7 vendors were sampled for microbiological quality according to the principle of simple random sampling on the arrival days of animal delivery. Then, surveillance tests were conducted to examine the microbiological contaminations according to the national standards of SPF laboratory animals. Results The total qualified rate was 80.36%, with 52.63% in SD rat, 82.76% in inbred mice, 86.67% in outbred mice and 86.36% in immunodeficient mice in details. The most frequent bacteria isolated were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsilla pneumoniae and Rodentibacter heylii, and their detection rates were 10.76%, 3.16%, 2.53% and 0.63%, respectively. Serological assays demonstrated the highest prevalence for virus was Sendai virus, and the detection rate was 2.53%. In addition to the pathogens those must be excluded from SPF rodents, Entamoeba muris and Enterobacter spp. were also detected in inbred mice, and Klebsiella oxytoca was detected in immunodeficient mice, with the detection rates of 1.15%, 2.30% and 4.55%, respectively. Conclusion There are certain incidences of pathogen infections in laboratory rats and mice from vendors, and an efficient microbiological monitoring of laboratory animals should be implemented in animal facilities, in order to eliminate pathogen infections in laboratory animals, which is required for improving the accuracy of research results and protecting the occupational health of laboratory animal practitioners as well.

Key words: Microbiology, Monitoring, Vendor, Laboratory animal quality, Rat, Mouse

中图分类号: