模拟高原低氧环境下运动疲劳大鼠脑皮层单羧酸转运蛋白的变化及其意义

doi:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2022.050

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨高原低氧环境下运动疲劳适应性的产生与大脑皮层乳酸转运及代谢状态的关联性。方法 63只清洁级SD大鼠随机分为对照组、常规运动组、急进高原组、高原习服3 d组、高原习服1周组、高原习服2周组及给予乳酸转运体抑制剂组（简称高原抑制剂组）。除对照组外，各组大鼠分别在常压常氧或模拟高原低压低氧条件下建立跑台力竭运动疲劳模型。以平均力竭时间确定大鼠运动疲劳的变化趋势。采用免疫印迹和免疫组织化学法检测运动区皮层单羧酸转运蛋白2（monocarboxylate transporters 2，MCT2）和MCT4的表达。采用尼氏染色进行大脑皮层迟发性神经元病理改变评价，并测定鼠脑乳酸含量。结果急进高原组和高原抑制剂组大鼠平均力竭时间分别为（61.00±6.55）min和（71.25±9.59）min，显著低于常规运动组［（124.75±9.36）min］和高原习服2周组［（100.25±9.74）min，P＜0.05）］。免疫印迹检测提示，高原习服2周组及高原抑制剂组鼠脑运动区皮层MCT2表达水平较对照组明显升高，分别为120.6%和164.4%（P＜0.05）；MCT4的表达分别为174.6%和168.8%（P＜0.05）。免疫组织化学检测印证了免疫印迹结果。模拟高原环境下，各组鼠脑乳酸平均含量较常规运动组［（0.175±0.021）mmoL/g］均明显升高（P＜0.05）。病理学评价提示，急进高原组和高原抑制剂组鼠脑皮层平均神经元密度值（每个高倍视野的神经元数量）分别为46.75±8.65和63.50±7.65，较对照组（135.88±8.59）明显降低（P＜0.05）；高原习服2周组（121.75±16.00）与对照组差异无统计学意义（P >0.05）。结论高原习服后机体对运动疲劳的适应性与脑内MCT2和MCT4表达变化相关联，可作为运动疲劳医学干预的靶点。

关键词: 高海拔, 低氧, 运动疲劳, 单羧酸转运蛋白, 乳酸, 大脑皮层, 大鼠

Abstract:

Objective To explore the correlation between adaptation to exercise-induced fatigue and lactate transport and metabolism in the cerebral cortex under high-altitude hypoxia. Methods A total of 63 SD rats were randomly divided into control, normal exercise, rush-entry-into-altitude, 3-day-altitude acclimatization, 1-week-altitude acclimatization, 2-week-altitude acclimatization, and monocarboxylate-transporter-inhibitor (altitude inhibitor injection) groups. Except for the control group, rats were subjected to exhaustive-load treadmill exercises under either normal pressure and normoxic conditions or low pressure and hypoxic conditions. The average time-to-exhaustion was used to determine variation trends in exercise-induced fatigue. The expression of monocarboxylate transporters (MCT)2 and MCT4 in the cerebral motor cortex was detected using western blotting and immunohistochemistry. The pathological evaluation of neuronal death in the cortex was carried out using Nissl staining, and the lactate content was also determined in rat brains. Results The average time-to-exhaustion in the rush-entry-into-altitude and the altitude inhibitor injection groups were (61.00±6.55) min and (71.25±9.59) min, respectively, which was significantly lower than that in the normal exercise (124.75±9.36) min and the 2-week-altitude acclimatization groups (100.25±9.74) min (P<0.05). Western blotting showed that, compared with the control group, the expression of MCT2 in the motor cortex in the 2-week-altitude acclimatization and the altitude inhibitor injection groups increased significantly by 120.6% and 164.4% (P<0.05), respectively; the expression of MCT4 in the two groups increased significantly by 174.6% and 168.8% (P<0.05). The results of western blotting were confirmed by the results of immunohistochemistry. In the high-altitude environment, the average lactate content in rat brains was significantly higher than that in the normal exercise group (0.175±0.021) mmol/g, P<0.05]. Neuropathological evaluation showed that the average neuronal density [neurons per high power field (HPF)] in the motor cortex in the rush-entry-into-altitude and the altitude inhibitor injection groups were (46.75±8.65) cells/HPF and (63.50±7.65) cells/HPF, respectively, which were significantly lower than that in the control group [(135.88±8.59) cells/HPF](P<0.05). Differences between the 2-week-altitude acclimatization [(121.75±16.00) cells/HPF] and the control groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion The adaptability of the body to exercise fatigue after altitude acclimatization is correlated with changes in the expression of MCT2 and MCT4 in the brain, which can be used as targets for medical intervention for exercise-induced fatigue.

Key words: High altitude, Hypoxia, Exercise-induced fatigue, Monocarboxylate transporters, Lactate, Cerebral cortex, Rats

中图分类号:

G804.7

高晨, 凡春玲, 李玉荣, 裴文娟, 关彩萍. 模拟高原低氧环境下运动疲劳大鼠脑皮层单羧酸转运蛋白的变化及其意义[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(5): 384-392.

Chen GAO, Chunling FAN, Yurong LI, Wenjuan PEI, Caiping GUAN. Changes in Expression of Monocarboxylate Transporters in the Rat Cerebral Cortex after Exercise-induced Fatigue Under Simulated High-altitude Hypoxia and its Significance[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2022, 42(5): 384-392.

图/表 6

表1 各组运动疲劳模型大鼠平均力竭时间 (xˉ±s, n=9)

Table 1 Average time–to–exhaustion in rats under exercise-induced fatigue conditions

分组 Group	平均运动力竭时间 Average exhaustion time /min
常规运动组 NE group	124.75±9.36^#△
急进高原组 REIA group	61.00±6.55^*
高原习服3 d组 3 d AA group	66.38±4.72^*
高原习服1周组 1 week AA group	73.13±7.02^*
高原习服2周组 2 weeks AA group	100.25±9.74^#△
高原抑制剂组 MTI group	71.25±9.59^*

图1 免疫印迹检测各组运动疲劳模型大鼠脑运动皮层中MCT2和MCT4的表达注：MCT2与对照组比较，*P＜0.05；MCT4与对照组比较，#P＜0.05。单因素方差分析采信Bonferroni法结果，n=3。

Figure 1 Western blotting analysis of MCT2 and MCT4 expressions in the cerebral motor cortex of rats in each groupNote：CG: Control group； NE group: Normal exercise group； REIA group: Rush-entry-into-altitude group； 3 d AA group: 3-day-altitude acclimatization group； 1 week AA group: 1-week-altitude acclimatization group； 2 weeks AA group: 2-week-altitude acclimatization group； MTI group: Monocarboxylate transporter inhibitor group. *P＜0.05， versus CG group for MCT2 quantitative analysis; #P<0.05， versus CG group for MCT4 quantitative analysis, ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni correction. n=3 for each group.

图2 免疫组织化学检测各组运动疲劳模型鼠脑运动皮层中MCT2（A）和MCT4（B）表达（DAB染色法，×400）注：A为大鼠脑运动皮层神经元MCT2表达；B为大鼠脑运动皮层星形胶质细胞MCT4表达。a和a’为对照组；b和b’为常规运动组；c和c’为急进高原组；d和d’为高原习服3 d组；e和e’为高原习服1周组；f和f’为高原习服2周组；g和g’为高原抑制剂组。比例尺大小为25 μm。

Figure 2 Immunohistochemical detection of MCT2 (A) and MCT4 (B) in the cerebral motor cortex of rats in each group (DAB staining, ×400)Note： A, MCT2 expression of neurons in the cerebral motor cortex of rats; B, MCT4 expression in astrocytes in the cerebral motor cortex of rats. a and a’, control group; b and b’, normal exercise group; c and c’, rush-entry-into-altitude group; d and d’, 3-day-altitude acclimatization group; e and e’, 1-week-altitude acclimatization group; f and f’, 2-week-altitude acclimatization group; g and g’, mono-carboxylate transporter inhibitor group. Scale bar = 25 μm.

表2 各组运动疲劳模型鼠脑运动皮层神经元组织学分级数量和平均神经元密度值 (xˉ±s, n=3)

Table 2 Histological grade and average neuronal density in the cerebral motor cortex of rats under exercise-induced fatigue conditions

分组 Group	神经元组织学分级 Neuronal histological grade (count)				平均神经元密度值 Average neuronal density/（cells·HPF^-1）
分组 Group	0级 0 grade	Ⅰ级 Ⅰ grade	Ⅱ级 Ⅱ grade	Ⅲ级 Ⅲ grade	平均神经元密度值 Average neuronal density/（cells·HPF^-1）
对照组 CG	3	0	0	0	135.88±8.59
常规运动组 NE group	2	1	0	0	123.88±6.71
急进高原组 REIA group	0	0	2	1	46.75±8.65^*
高原习服3 d组 3 d AA group	0	0	3	0	54.13±11.33^*
高原习服1周组 1 week AA group	0	2	1	0	119.50±6.99^*
高原习服2周组 2 weeks AA group	0	3	0	0	121.75±16.00
高原抑制剂组 MTI group	0	1	2	0	63.50±7.65^*

图3 各组运动疲劳模型鼠脑运动皮层神经元尼氏染色（×200，局部放大×400）注：a为对照组；b为常规运动组；c为急进高原组；d为高原习服3 d组；e为高原习服1周组；f为高原习服2周组；g为高原抑制剂组。比例尺大小为50 μm。

Figure 3 Nissl staining in the cerebral motor cortex of rats under exercise-induced fatigue conditions (×200，local enlarged image×400 )Note：a, control group; b, normal exercise group; c, rush-entry-into-altitude group; d, 3-day-altitude acclimatization group; e, 1-week-altitude acclimatization group; f, 2-week-altitude acclimatization group; g, monocarboxylate transporter inhibitor group. Scale bar = 50 μm.

表3 各组运动疲劳模型大鼠平均脑组织乳酸含量 (xˉ±s, n=3)

Table 3 Average brain lactate content in rats under exercise-induced fatigue conditions

分组 Group	脑组织乳酸含量 Average brain lactate content/(mmol·g^-1)
对照组 CG	0.163±0.011^#△
常规运动组 NE group	0.175±0.021^#△
急进高原组 REIA group	0.239±0.017^*△
高原习服3 d组 3 d AA group	0.247±0.012^*△
高原习服1周组 1 week AA group	0.397±0.017^*#△
高原习服2周组 2 weeks AA group	0.412±0.024^*#△
高原抑制剂组 MTI group	0.537±0.011^*#

参考文献 36

1	邓树勋. 运动生理学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999.
	DENG S X. Exercise physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1999.
2	高强. 疲劳及其测定(上)[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 1985, 4(3):179-183. DOI:10.16038/j.1000-6710.1985.03.019 .
	GAO Q. Fatigue and its fatigue measurement (part one)[J]. Chin J Sports Med, 1985, 4(3):179-183. DOI:10.16038/j.1000-6710.1985.03.019 .
3	鲁建清, 满维祥, 罗荣保. 5-羟色胺与中枢运动疲劳的分析研究[J]. 湖南科技学院学报, 2010, 31(4):79-82. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-2219.2010.04.023 .
	LU J Q, MAN W X, LUO R B. An analyze 5-HT, fatigue and their relationships[J]. J Hunan Univ Sci Eng, 2010, 31(4):79-82. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-2219.2010.04.023 .
4	GIRARD O, MILLET G P. Neuromuscular fatigue in racquet sports [J]. Neurol Clin, 2008, 26(1):181-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl. 2007.11.011 .
5	AMANN M, DEMPSEY J A. Ensemble input of group III/IV muscle afferents to CNS: a limiting factor of central motor drive during endurance exercise from normoxia to moderate hypoxia[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2016, 903:325-342. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4899-7678-9_22 .
6	DAVIS J M, ALDERSON N L, WELSH R S. Serotonin and central nervous system fatigue: nutritional considerations[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2000, 72(2):573S-578S. DOI:10.1093/ajcn/72.2.573S .
7	刘红平, 杨国愉, 张晶轩, 等. 急进高原驻训军人躯体-脑力疲劳追踪研究[J]. 西北国防医学杂志, 2017, 38(9):565-569. DOI:10.16021/j.cnki.1007-8622.2017.09.002 .
	LIU H P, YANG G Y, ZHANG J X, et al. Investigation of physical-mental fatigue on armymen acutely entering in plateau[J]. Med J Natl Defending Forces Northwest China, 2017, 38(9):565-569. DOI:10.16021/j.cnki.1007-8622.2017.09.002 .
8	陶文迪, 田秀玉, 李茂星, 等. 黄芪水提取物对高原缺氧大鼠运动能力的影响[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2019, 31(12):12-18. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-140X.2019.12.003 .
	TAO W D, TIAN X Y, LI M X, et al. Effect of Astragalus membranaceus aqueous extract on ability of plateau hypoxia exercise in rats[J]. Med ＆ Pharm J Chin People's Liberation Army, 2019, 31(12):12-18. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-140X.2019.12.003 .
9	DHILLON H S, CARMAN H M, ZHANG D, et al. Severity of experimental brain injury on lactate and free fatty acid accumulation and Evans blue extravasation in the rat cortex and hippocampus[J]. J Neurotrauma, 1999, 16(6):455-469. DOI:10.1089/neu.1999.16.455 .
10	王静, 刘洪涛. 脑乳酸对运动性中枢疲劳的作用及影响[J]. 中国临床康复, 2004, 8(22):4572-4573. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 1673-8225.2004.22.102 .
	WANG J, LIU H T. Effect of brain lactic acid on exercise-induced central fatigue[J]. Chin J Clin Rehabil, 2004, 8(22):4572-4573. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 1673-8225.2004.22.102 .
11	杨东升, 刘晓莉, 乔德才. "乳酸穿梭"背景下的运动性疲劳中枢机制研究新进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2012,27(3):285-288. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2012.03.024 .
	YANG D S, LIU X L, QIAO D C. New progress of research on central mechanism of exercise-induced fatigue under the background of lactic acid shuttle[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2012, 27(3):285-288. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2012.03.024 .
12	PELLERIN L, MAGISTRETTI P J. Glutamate uptake into astrocytes stimulates aerobic glycolysis: a mechanism coupling neuronal activity to glucose utilization[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91(22):10625-10629. DOI:10.1073/pnas. 91.22.10625 .
13	SCHURR A. Glycolysis paradigm shift dictates a reevaluation of glucose and oxygen metabolic rates of activated neural tissue[J]. Front Neurosci, 2018, 12:700. DOI:10.3389/fnins. 2018.00700 .
14	GAO C, ZHOU L Y, ZHU W X, et al. Monocarboxylate transporter-dependent mechanism confers resistance to oxygen- and glucose-deprivation injury in astrocyte-neuron co-cultures[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2015, 594:99-104. DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.03.062 .
15	HALESTRAP A P. The SLC16 gene family - Structure, role and regulation in health and disease[J]. Mol Aspects Med, 2013, 34(2-3):337-349. DOI:10.1016/j.mam.2012.05.003 .
16	GAO C, ZHU W X, TIAN L Z, et al. MCT4-Mediated Expression of EAAT1 is Involved in the Resistance to Hypoxia Injury in Astrocyte-Neuron co-Cultures[J]. Neurochem Res, 2015, 40(4):818-828. DOI:10.1007/s11064-015-1532-2 .
17	BEDFORD T G, TIPTON C M, WILSON N C, et al. Maximum oxygen consumption of rats and its changes with various experimental procedures[J]. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol, 1979, 47(6):1278-1283. DOI:10.1152/jappl.1979.47.6.1278 .
18	胡琰茹, 乔德才, 刘晓莉. 力竭运动过程中大鼠苍白球内侧部对皮层的调控作用[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2013, 32(5):420-425, 419. DOI:10.16038/j.1000-6710.2013.05.001 .
	HU Y R, QIAO D C, LIU X L. Modulatory effect of the internal segment of globus pallidus on motor cortex activity during exhaustive exercise[J]. Chin J Sports Med, 2013, 32(5):420-425, 419. DOI:10.16038/j.1000-6710.2013.05.001 .
19	SCHURR A, PAYNE R S, MILLER J J, et al. Blockade of lactate transport exacerbates delayed neuronal damage in a rat model of cerebral ischemia[J]. Brain Res, 2001, 895(1-2):268-272. DOI:10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02082-0 .
20	GAO C, WANG C, LIU B, et al. Intermittent hypoxia preconditioning-induced epileptic tolerance by upregulation of monocarboxylate transporter 4 expression in rat hippocampal astrocytes[J]. Neurochem Res, 2014, 39(11):2160-2169. DOI:10.1007/s11064-014-1411-2 .
21	LI D Y, LIU X Y, LIU T M, et al. Neurochemical regulation of the expression and function of glial fibrillary acidic protein in astrocytes[J]. Glia, 2020, 68(5):878-897. DOI:10.1002/glia.23734 .
22	GAO C, LI Z Y, BAI J, et al. Involvement of monocarboxylate transporters in the cross-tolerance between epilepsy and cerebral infarction: a promising choice towards new treatments[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2019, 707:134305. DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134305 .
23	高晨, 白洁, 雷鹏, 等. 低氧预处理对氯化锂-匹鲁卡品致痫大鼠的保护作用[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2018, 35(1):111-115. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2018.01.037 .
	GAO C, BAI J, LEI P, et al. The protective effect of hypoxia preconditioning on epilepsy induced by lithium-pilocarpine in rats[J]. Chin J Exp Surg, 2018, 35(1):111-115. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2018.01.037 .
24	ZHANG L S, LI J, LIN A N. Assessment of neurodegeneration and neuronal loss in aged 5XFAD mice[J]. STAR Protoc, 2021, 2(4):100915. DOI:10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100915 .
25	武柠子, 马慧萍, 王昕, 等. 模拟高原缺氧环境对大鼠心、脑组织损伤的研究[J]. 药学实践杂志, 2018, 36(3):250-254. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.03.013 .
	WU N Z, MA H P, WANG X, et al. Study on myocardium and brain damage in rats by simulating high altitude[J]. J Pharm Pract, 2018, 36(3):250-254. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.03.013 .
26	高钰琪. 高原军事医学[M]. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 2005: 180-220.
	GAO Y Q. High altitude military medicine[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing Publishing House, 2005: 180-220.
27	程泽鹏, 冯钰, 史仍飞. 运动过程中单羧酸转运蛋白(MCTs)作用的研究进展[J]. 军事体育学报, 2017, 36(3):89-94. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1300.2017.03.025 .
	CHENG Z P, FENG Y, SHI R F. Research on MCTs function during the exercise[J]. J Mil Phys Educ Sports, 2017, 36(3):89-94. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1300.2017.03.025 .
28	高晨, 王菀, 李玉荣, 等. 运动疲劳状态下大鼠脑皮层单羧酸转运蛋白表达的变化及意义[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(1):42-47. DOI:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2021-053 .
	GAO C, WANG W, LI Y R, et al. Expression and significance of monocarboxylate transporters in cortex of rats after exercise-induced fatigue[J]. Lab Animal Comp Med, 2022, 42(1):42-47. DOI:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2021-053 .
29	ÓRDENES P, VILLAR P S, TARIFEÑO-SALDIVIA E, et al. Lactate activates hypothalamic POMC neurons by intercellular signaling[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11:21644. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-00947-7 .
31	GUAN X W, MORRIS M E. In vitro and In vivo efficacy of AZD3965 and alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in the murine 4T1 breast tumor model[J]. AAPS J, 2020, 22(4):84. DOI:10.1208/s12248-020-00466-9 .
32	YU J T, WEI Z X, LI Q, et al. Advanced cancer starvation therapy by simultaneous deprivation of lactate and glucose using a MOF nanoplatform[J]. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2021, 8(19): e2101467. DOI:10.1002/advs.202101467 .
33	GARCIA C K, BROWN M S, PATHAK R K, et al. cDNA cloning of MCT2, a second monocarboxylate transporter expressed in different cells than MCT1[J]. J Biol Chem, 1995, 270(4):1843-1849. DOI:10.1074/jbc.270.4.1843 .
34	BRÖER S, BRÖER A, SCHNEIDER H P, et al. Characterization of the high-affinity monocarboxylate transporter MCT2 in Xenopus laevis oocytes[J]. Biochem J, 1999, 341(Pt 3):529-535. DOI:10.1042/0264-6021:3410529 .
35	ERLICHMAN J S, HEWITT A, DAMON T L, et al. Inhibition of monocarboxylate transporter 2 in the retrotrapezoid nucleus in rats: a test of the astrocyte-neuron lactate-shuttle hypothesis[J]. J Neurosci, 2008, 28(19):4888-4896. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5430-07.2008 .
36	PARKIN G M, UDAWELA M, GIBBONS A, et al. Glutamate transporters, EAAT1 and EAAT2, are potentially important in the pathophysiology and treatment of schizophrenia and affective disorders[J]. World J Psychiatry, 2018, 8(2):51-63. DOI:10.5498/wjp.v8.i2.51 .

[1]	侯敏博, 崔甜甜, 苏娜瑛, 张苗苗, 焦永敏, 严建燕, 汪溪洁, 大平东子. 一例Han-Wistar大鼠垂体细胞瘤的病理学分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(6): 654-658.
[2]	赵丽亚, 倪丽菊, 张彩勤, 汤建平, 姚养正, 聂艳艳, 顾晓雪, 赵莹. 基于多重PCR-LDR技术建立近交系大鼠单核苷酸多态性遗传检测方案[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(5): 548-558.
[3]	于灵芝, 谢建芸, 冯丽萍, 魏晓锋. 金黄色葡萄球菌荧光定量PCR检测方法的建立及其在大鼠、小鼠粪便检测中的应用[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(5): 566-573.
[4]	黄缨, 韦思羽, 蔡莉, 强苏静, 李冬婷, 丁玉强. 供应商来源的实验大鼠和小鼠微生物监测结果分析：以复旦大学实验动物科学部为例[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(4): 347-354.
[5]	黄慧, 邓亚胜, 梁天薇, 郑艺清, 范燕萍, 荣娜, 林江. 卵巢储备功能减退动物模型的造模方法评价与分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(4): 422-428.
[6]	夏子茵, 柴媛媛, 徐云霞, 俞沁玮, 黄鑫, 张陆勇, 江振洲. 大鼠血清尿酸液相色谱-紫外检测新方法的建立及比较研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(3): 314-322.
[7]	谭莹, 廖文平, 高启龙, 李勇, 史新辉, 王京昆. 碘酸钠诱发视网膜色素变性大鼠模型的生理指标和组织病理学分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(2): 124-135.
[8]	葛健, 孙静芬, 吴永杰. 牛磺酸对苯扎氯铵损伤大鼠眼角膜内皮细胞无保护作用[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(1): 39-43.
[9]	许琴, 倪艳, 是文辉, 李建瑛, 刘江伟, 赵红琼, 徐新明. SPF级雄性SD大鼠回肠与结肠菌群结构比较分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(1): 53-60.
[10]	杨丽雅, 宋涛, 何佳璘, 郭一鸣, 亓明康, 王含必, 王慧萍. 阴道萎缩大鼠模型的建立及在药效评价中的应用[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(6): 531-540.
[11]	吴斌, 王旭, 付东旭, 朱宇均, 黄金路, 朱顺星. 疏肝解郁方对便秘型肠易激综合征大鼠模型的疗效及脑-肠轴功能的影响[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(6): 551-559.
[12]	黄少凤, 林忠, 朱雪红, 刘姝岑, 宾力. 宫腔粘连大鼠模型研究进展[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(6): 560-565.
[13]	许冰馨, 范凯健, 王婷玉, 陈慧瑾. 地塞米松对胶原诱导性关节炎大鼠模型软骨退化的改善作用[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(5): 416-422.
[14]	覃辉艳, 陈华凤, 杨慧, 罗海兰, 傅伟忠, 李庆波, 张洁宏. 缫丝水对老龄大鼠氧化应激水平的改善作用[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(5): 393-400.
[15]	张笑瑞, 曹静, 吴倩倩, 刘季俊, 陈国元, 吴宝金. 不同剂型普罗布考对大鼠肠系膜淋巴转运及药代动力学的影响[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(4): 275-283.