C57BL/6J、129/SvJ及其杂交一代小鼠的行为学比较研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5817.2019.06.002

实验动物与比较医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 429-436.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5817.2019.06.002

所属专题：实验动物资源开发与利用

C57BL/6J、129/SvJ及其杂交一代小鼠的行为学比较研究

万颖寒¹, 沈如凌¹, 王珏¹, 龚慧¹, 李俊¹, 董茹¹, 费俭^1,2

1.上海实验动物研究中心/同济大学生命科学与技术学院模式生物技术联合实验室, 上海 201203;
2.上海南方模式生物科技股份有限公司上海模式动物工程技术研究中心, 上海 201318

收稿日期:2019-05-09 出版日期:2019-12-25 发布日期:2021-01-05
作者简介:万颖寒(1984-), 女, 硕士, 工程师, 从事实验动物表型研究。E-mail: wanyinghan@slarc.org.cn
基金资助:
上海市比较医学专业技术服务平台(18DZ2293500), 浦东新区科委项目(PKF2015-C03)

Comparative Studies on Behavior of C57BL/6J、129/SvJ and Their Hybrid Mice

WAN Ying-han¹, SHEN Rui-ling¹, WANG Jue¹, GONG Hui¹, LI Jun¹, DONG Ru¹, FEI Jian^1,2

1. Joint Laboratory for Technology of Model Organisms,Shanghai Laboratory Animal Research Center and School of Life Science and Technology of Tongji University, Shanghai 201203, China;
2. Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Model Organisms, SMOC, Shanghai 201318, China

Received:2019-05-09 Online:2019-12-25 Published:2021-01-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较C57BL/6J和129/SvJ两种不同遗传背景及其杂交一代(F1)在行为学表型上的差异。方法将C57BL/6J小鼠和129/SvJ小鼠交配繁育,得到两种F1小鼠129B6F1和B6129F1, 连同C57BL/6J和129/SvJ按照不同性别分为8组,每组小鼠数量n≥12,进行旷场活动、悬尾、水迷宫、被动回避、热板实验等行为学研究,分别从焦虑、抑郁、学习记忆、热痛四个方面比较C57BL/6J和129/SvJ小鼠及F1小鼠的行为表现。结果在旷场活动中,与129/SvJ比较,F1在外周、边缘的活动差异显著(P<0.01); 在悬尾活动中,F1的行为没有显著性差异; 在水迷宫和被动回避活动中,与C57BL/6J比较,F1寻找到平台的潜伏期和进入暗箱的潜伏期差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 F1的不同行为表型受到亲代的不同遗传背景影响。

关键词: 近交系小鼠, C57BL/6J, 129/SvJ, 杂交一代(F1), 行为学

Abstract: Objective To compare the genetic backgrounds of C57BL/6J and 129/SvJ and the behavioral phenotypes with their hybrid (F1) mice. Methods C57BL/6J and 129/SvJ were cross mated and bred to obtain two F1 (129B6F1 and B6129F1). These F1 mice with C57BL/6J and 129/SvJ were divided into 8 groups of experimental mice according to different gender. Numbers of mice in each group were no less than 12. Behavioral studies such as the open field test, the tail suspension test, the morris water maze, the passive avoidance test, the hot plate were conducted to compare the behavioral performance of C57BL/6J, 129/SvJ and F1 from the paramters of anxiety, depression, learning and memory, and heat pain response respectively. Results Compared with 129/SvJ, F1 had significant difference in peripheral and marginal activities in the open field activities (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the behavior of F1 and parent mice in the tail suspension activities. Compared with C57BL/6J, the latency of finding the platform and entering the dark box of F1 were significantly different in the morris water maze and the passive avoidance activities (P<0.05). Conclusion Different behavior phenotypes of F1 are influenced by different genetic backgrounds of their parents.

Key words: Inbred mice, C57BL/6J, 129/SvJ, Hybrid (F1), Behavior

中图分类号:

Q95-33

万颖寒, 沈如凌, 王珏, 龚慧, 李俊, 董茹, 费俭. C57BL/6J、129/SvJ及其杂交一代小鼠的行为学比较研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2019, 39(6): 429-436.

WAN Ying-han, SHEN Rui-ling, WANG Jue, GONG Hui, LI Jun, DONG Ru, FEI Jian. Comparative Studies on Behavior of C57BL/6J、129/SvJ and Their Hybrid Mice[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2019, 39(6): 429-436.

参考文献

[1] Voikar V, Koks S, Vasar E, et al.Strain and gender differences in the behavior of mouse lines commonly used in transgenic studies[J]. Physiol Behav, 2001, 72(1-2): 271-281.
[2] Serpi R, Klein-Rodewald T, Calzada-Wack J, et al.Inbred wild type mouse strains have distinct spontaneous morphological phenotypes[J]. Histol Histopathol, 2013, 28(1): 79-88.
[3] Frankel WN.Mouse strain backgrounds: more than black and white[J]. Neuron, 1998, 20(2): 183.
[4] Crawley JN. Unusual behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains[J]. Trends Neurosci, 1996, 19 (5):181-182; discussion 188-189.
[5] Seibenhener ML, Wooten MC.Use of the Open Field Maze to measure locomotor and anxiety-like behavior in mice[J]. J Vis Exp, 2015, (96): e52434.
[6] Cryan JF, Mombereau C, Vassout A.The tail suspension test as a model for assessing antidepressant activity: review of pharmacological and genetic studies in mice[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2005, 29(4-5):571-625.
[7] Barnhart CD, Yang D, Lein PJ.Using the Morris water maze to assess spatial learning and memory in weanling mice[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4):e0124521.
[8] Vorhees CV, Williams MT.Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory[J]. Nat Protoc, 2006, 1(2):848-858.
[9] Weitzner DS, Engler-Chiurazzi EB, Kotilinek LA, et al.Morris water maze Test: optimization for mouse strain and testing environment[J]. J Vis Exp, 2015, (100):e52706.
[10] Eagle AL, Wang H, Robison AJ. Sensitive assessment of hippocampal learning using temporally dissociated passive avoidance task[J]. Bio Protoc, 2016, 6(11).pii: e1821.
[11] Hwang CJ, Yun HM, Park KR, et al.Memory impairment in estrogen receptor alpha knockout mice through accumulation of amyloid-beta peptides[J]. Mol Neurobiol, 2015, 52(1):176-186.
[12] Masocha W, Kombian SB, Edafiogho IO.Evaluation of the antinociceptive activities of enaminone compounds on the formalin and hot plate tests in mice[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6:21582.
[13] Griebel G, Holmes A.50 years of hurdles and hope in anxiolytic drug discovery[J]. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2013, 12(9):667-687.
[14] Homanics GE, Quinlan JJ, Firestone LL.Pharmacologic and behavioral responses of inbred C57BL/6J and strain 129/SvJ mouse lines[J]. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 1999, 63(1):21-26.
[15] Dockstader CL, van der Kooy D. Mouse strain differences in opiate reward learning are explained by differences in anxiety, not reward or learning[J]. J Neurosci, 2001, 21(22):9077-9081.
[16] Bilder RM, Goldman RS, Robinson D, et al.Neuropsychology of first-episode schizophrenia: initial characterization and clinical correlates[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2000, 157(4): 549-559.
[17] Heinrichs RW, Zakzanis KK.Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of the evidence[J]. Neuropsychology, 1998, 12(3):426-445.
[18] Tyler WJ, Alonso M, Bramham CR, et al.From acquisition to consolidation: on the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in hippocampal-dependent learning[J]. Learn Mem, 2002, 9(5):224-237.
[19] Shoji H, Takao K, Hattori S, et al.Age-related changes in behavior in C57BL/6J mice from young adulthood to middle age[J]. Mol Brain, 2016, 9:11.
[20] 王维刚, 周嘉斌, 朱明莉, 等. 小鼠动物实验方法系列专题(一)——Morris水迷宫实验在小鼠表型分析中的应用[J]. 中国细胞生物学学报, 2011, (1):8-14.

C57BL/6J、129/SvJ及其杂交一代小鼠的行为学比较研究

Comparative Studies on Behavior of C57BL/6J、129/SvJ and Their Hybrid Mice

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭文文, 赵亚, 王颖花, 刘可, 葛煦, 张延英, 汪永锋, 师长宏. 人参皂苷Rg1在小鼠创伤性脑损伤修复中的作用[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(3): 243-252.
[2]	胡玲, 胡志斌, 胡筠卿, 丁玉强. 精神分裂症动物模型的研究概述[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(2): 145-155.
[3]	李晗, 张笑瑞, 张成芳. 间歇禁食法在改善奥氮平诱导小鼠代谢紊乱中的机制研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(1): 3-10.
[4]	赵斯佳, 何新宇, 景泉, 马林, 郭春岚, 万阔. 大鼠急性牙髓炎痛敏模型的疼痛效应评价[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(4): 333-341.
[5]	娄惠娟, 张红石, 王宇峰, 贾萌, 丛德毓. 光化学法与线栓法制作局灶性脑梗死大鼠模型的比较研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(1): 48-53.
[6]	张燕, 燕顺生. Rncat先天性白内障小鼠模型培育及初步应用[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2021, 41(6): 501-504.
[7]	颜义彤, 白帆, 荆瀛黎, 王立淼, 李子晗, 于艳. 小鼠脊髓损伤打击模型精细行为的比较研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2021, 41(4): 290-298.
[8]	李自发, 张浩, 任萌, 徐凯勇, 胡明会, 周苗苗, 王可洲. 槲皮素对镉致小鼠肝脏脂质代谢紊乱模型的保护效应[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2021, 41(4): 305-312.
[9]	洪胜辉, 张旭亮, 王芊芊, 刘平, 刘迪文. 抑制素基因敲除小鼠模型的构建及表型初步分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2020, 40(4): 306-.
[10]	李雷斌, 许佳, 方远书, 姜正前, 裘颖儿, 王文倩, 赵先哲. 基于自发糖尿病模型小鼠代谢组学的全植物蛋白配方饲料研究#br#[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2020, 40(3): 204-.
[11]	雷山, 刘强, 黄维金, 王佑春. 小鼠品系、性别和被毛对可视化假病毒感染模型的影响[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2019, 39(6): 423-428.
[12]	刘波, 王杨, 李志杰. 应用于行为学研究中八臂迷宫实验方法的改良[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2019, 39(3): 226-230.
[13]	钱强, 徐园, 王亚恒, 周宇荀, 肖君华, 韩琳, 鲍世民, 李凯. 基于多重PCR靶向二代测序的近交系小鼠遗传质量监测方法建立[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2019, 39(2): 111-117.
[14]	牛博文, 陈丽香, 朱孟敏, 彭秀华, 秦波音, 李峰. C57BL/6J背景基因修饰小鼠精子冷冻保种及品系恢复方法[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2019, 39(2): 146-150.
[15]	张志成, 宋庆凯, 黎晓慧, 李娜, 黄鑫, 袁圆, 王璇, 李明学, 代解杰. MPTP诱导树鼩帕金森疾病模型行为学检测方法研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2019, 39(1): 9-14.