实验动物与比较医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 784-793.DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.156
雷林蓓, 万小娟, 谢婧, 刘雨新, 邹节新, 谢宪兵(
)(
)
收稿日期:2025-09-16
修回日期:2025-12-03
出版日期:2025-12-25
发布日期:2025-12-19
通讯作者:
谢宪兵(1980—),男,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师,研究方向:实验动物资源开发与利用。E-mail: xbxbees@ncu.edu.cn。ORCID: 0000-0002-9733-9857作者简介:雷林蓓(2000—),女,硕士研究生,研究方向:基础医学。E-mail: 996037484@qq.com
基金资助:
LEI Linbei, WAN Xiaojuan, XIE Jing, LIU Yuxin, ZOU Jiexin, XIE Xianbing(
)(
)
Received:2025-09-16
Revised:2025-12-03
Published:2025-12-25
Online:2025-12-19
Correspondence to:
XIE Xianbing (ORCID: 0000-0002-9733-9857), E-mail: xbxbees@ncu.edu.cn摘要:
随着微生物组学研究的不断深入与精准医学的快速发展,寻找理想的研究模型已成为推动相关领域发展的关键。传统哺乳动物模型(如小鼠)虽应用广泛,但其复杂的肠道微生物组、显著的个体差异、较为昂贵的饲养成本与较长的实验周期,在一定程度上制约了高通量、机制明确型研究的开展。在此背景下,无菌蜜蜂作为一种新兴的生物医学研究模型日益受到重视。蜜蜂作为社会性昆虫,不仅具有生命周期短、繁殖快的特点,且其肠道菌群结构相对简单稳定,能够实现大规模的无菌化饲养与维持。这些独特的生物学优势使无菌蜜蜂成为探究宿主-微生物相互作用、免疫调控、代谢机制及神经行为关联的优质模型,在疾病机制解析、药物开发与微生物组功能研究等领域展现出显著潜力。本文系统阐述无菌蜜蜂模型的构建方法、核心生物学特性及其在生物医学研究中的具体应用,客观分析该模型当前面临的技术瓶颈与伦理挑战,并展望其在未来跨学科研究中的发展方向。本文首次从“模型构建”、“应用与优势”、“现存挑战”和“未来展望”共4个维度进行系统梳理,对无菌蜜蜂作为生物医学模型的研究进展进行全面整合,不仅为相关领域研究者提供了重要的技术与理论参考,也凸显了该模型在推动基础生物学向转化医学应用迈进中的独特价值,对其规范化发展与深入探索具有积极的指导意义。
中图分类号:
雷林蓓,万小娟,谢婧,等. 无菌蜜蜂在生物医学研究中的应用、优势与挑战[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2025, 45(6): 784-793. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.156.
LEI Linbei,WAN Xiaojuan,XIE Jing,et al. Applications, Advantages, and Challenges of Germ-Free Bees in Biomedical Research[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(6): 784-793. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.156.
项目 Aspect | 幼虫 Larva | 羽化成蜂 Newly emerged adult | 主要区别 Key differences |
|---|---|---|---|
总体功能 Overall function | 主要用于吸收液体饲料,以供快速生长 | 消化和吸收花粉、花蜜等多样食物,并进行能量代谢 | 成蜂肠道功能更复杂,代谢能力增强 |
口器与咽部 Mouthparts and pharynx | 吸食型,仅适用于液体饲料 | 咀嚼-吸吮式口器,可处理固体花粉和花蜜 | 不同结构与食性相适应 |
前肠 Foregut | 简单管状,无明显膨大 | 前端形成蜜囊,具有幽门瓣调控功能 | 成蜂具储蜜与携蜜功能 |
中肠 Midgut | 壁薄、上皮简单,主要吸收液态营养 | 上皮发达、具绒毛及多种消化酶 | 成蜂消化与吸收效率显著提高 |
后肠 Hindgut | 短而简单,无直肠垫结构 | 具有发达的直肠垫,可重吸收水分 | 可适应成蜂外出期间保留粪便的需要 |
马氏管 Malpighian tubules | 发育不完全或数量较少 | 完全发育,参与排泄与渗透调节 | 成蜂排泄系统完善 |
肠道菌群 Gut microbiota | 近乎无菌;蜂王浆具有抗菌性 | 通过群体接触获得核心菌群 | 成蜂建立稳定肠道菌群 |
表1 成年蜜蜂的消化系统与幼虫之间的主要差异
Table 1 Major differences in the digestive system between adult bees and larvae
项目 Aspect | 幼虫 Larva | 羽化成蜂 Newly emerged adult | 主要区别 Key differences |
|---|---|---|---|
总体功能 Overall function | 主要用于吸收液体饲料,以供快速生长 | 消化和吸收花粉、花蜜等多样食物,并进行能量代谢 | 成蜂肠道功能更复杂,代谢能力增强 |
口器与咽部 Mouthparts and pharynx | 吸食型,仅适用于液体饲料 | 咀嚼-吸吮式口器,可处理固体花粉和花蜜 | 不同结构与食性相适应 |
前肠 Foregut | 简单管状,无明显膨大 | 前端形成蜜囊,具有幽门瓣调控功能 | 成蜂具储蜜与携蜜功能 |
中肠 Midgut | 壁薄、上皮简单,主要吸收液态营养 | 上皮发达、具绒毛及多种消化酶 | 成蜂消化与吸收效率显著提高 |
后肠 Hindgut | 短而简单,无直肠垫结构 | 具有发达的直肠垫,可重吸收水分 | 可适应成蜂外出期间保留粪便的需要 |
马氏管 Malpighian tubules | 发育不完全或数量较少 | 完全发育,参与排泄与渗透调节 | 成蜂排泄系统完善 |
肠道菌群 Gut microbiota | 近乎无菌;蜂王浆具有抗菌性 | 通过群体接触获得核心菌群 | 成蜂建立稳定肠道菌群 |
| [1] | 秦川, 魏泓, 谭毅, 等. 实验动物学(第2版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2021. |
| QIN C, WEI H, TAN Y, et al. Laboratory animal science[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2021. | |
| [2] | 中华人民共和国中央人民政府网. 习近平主持中共中央政治局第三十三次集体学习并发表重要讲话[EB/OL]. (2021-09-29)[2025-12-04]. . |
| The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China website. Xi Jinping presided over the 33rd collective study session of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and delivered an important speech [EB/OL]. (2021-09-29)[2025-12-04]. . | |
| [3] | 秦川, 孔琪, 钱军, 等. 实验动物科学技术是生命科学和健康中国建设的基础支撑条件[J]. 科技导报, 2017, 35(11): 10-14. DOI: CNKI:SUN:KJDB.0.2017-11-004 . |
| QIN C, KONG Q, QIAN J, et al. Laboratory animal science and technology is strategically important to life science and health China construction[J]. Sci Technol Rev, 2017, 35(11): 10-14. DOI: CNKI:SUN:KJDB.0.2017-11-004 . | |
| [4] | 赵心刚, 卢凡, 程苹, 等. 我国实验动物资源建设的问题与展望[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(12): 1371-1378. DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2019.12.006 . |
| ZHAO X G, LU F, CHENG P, et al. Problems and prospects of laboratory animal resources in China[J]. Bull Chin Acad Sci, 2019, 34(12): 1371-1378. DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2019.12.006 . | |
| [5] | 陈俊, 江舒文. 进口实验动物那些事儿[J]. 中国海关, 2020(5): 44-45. |
| CHEN J, JIANG S W. Those things about importing experimental animals[J]. China Cust, 2020(5): 44-45. | |
| [6] | O'BRIEN T J, BARLOW I L FERIANI L, et al. High-throughput tracking enables systematic phenotyping and drug repurposing in C. elegans disease models[J]. Elife, 2025: 1-17. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.92491 . |
| [7] | HUANG Z Y, BIAN G W, XI Z Y, et al. Genes important for survival or reproduction in Varroa destructor identified by RNAi[J]. Insect Sci, 2019, 26(1): 68-75. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12513 . |
| [8] | BOUKRAA L. Bee products: the rediscovered antibiotics[J]. Anti Infect Agents, 2015, 13(1): 36-41. DOI: 10.2174/2211352513666150318233855 . |
| [9] | CALDERONE N W. Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992-2009[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(5): e37235. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037235 . |
| [10] | GIURFA M, MENZEL R. Human spatial representation derived from a honeybee compass[J]. Trends Cogn Sci, 2003, 7(2): 59-60. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00044-x . |
| [11] | IHLE K E, RUEPPELL O, HUANG Z Y, et al. Genetic architecture of a hormonal response to gene knockdown in honey bees[J]. J Hered, 2015, 106(2): 155-165. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esu086 . |
| [12] | 罗照亮. 蜜蜂授粉助力绿色农业——记蓬勃发展中的北京市蜜蜂授粉产业[J]. 中国蜂业, 2023, 74(6): 36-37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0412-4367.2023.06.018 . |
| LUO Z L. Bee pollination helps green agriculture: The booming bee pollination industry in Beijing[J]. Apic China, 2023, 74(6): 36-37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0412-4367.2023.06.018 . | |
| [13] | MORSE R A, CALDERONE N W. The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S[EB/OL]. (2003-06-13)[2025-12-04]. . |
| [14] | LIU J H, LIAO C H, LI Z, et al. Synergistic resistance of honeybee (Apis mellifera) and their gut microorganisms to fluvalinate stress[J]. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2024, 201: 105865. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.105865 . |
| [15] | NIEH J C, ENDLER M, RUBANOV A, et al. Immune priming of honey bees protects against a major microsporidian pathogen[J]. Pest Manag Sci, 2025, 81(12): 7939-7949. DOI: 10.1002/ps.70106 . |
| [16] | MARGOTTA J W, MANCINELLI G E, BENITO A A, et al. Effects of flight on gene expression and aging in the honey bee brain and flight muscle[J]. Insects, 2013, 4(1): 9-30. DOI: 10.3390/insects4010009 . |
| [17] | FENG Y, WEI R K, CHEN Q L, et al. Host specificity and cophylogeny in the "animal-gut bacteria-phage" tripartite system[J]. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes, 2024, 10: 1-12. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-024-00557-x . |
| [18] | MÜNCH D, AMDAM G V, WOLSCHIN F. Ageing in a eusocial insect: molecular and physiological characteristics of life span plasticity in the honey bee[J]. Funct Ecol, 2008, 22(3): 407-421. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01419.x . |
| [19] | ZHANG Z J, MU X H, SHI Y, et al. Distinct roles of honeybee gut bacteria on host metabolism and neurological processes[J]. Microbiol Spectr, 2022, 10(2): 1-15. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum. 02438-21 . |
| [20] | LANG H Y, DUAN H J, WANG J N, et al. Specific strains of honeybee gut Lactobacillus stimulate host immune system to protect against pathogenic Hafnia alvei [J]. Microbiol Spectr, 2022, 10(1): 1-15. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01896-21 . |
| [21] | HUANG J, ZHANG Z, FENG W, et al. Food wanting is mediated by transient activation of dopaminergic signaling in the honey bee brain[J]. Science, 2022, 376(6592): 508-512. DOI: 10.1126/science.abn9920 . |
| [22] | DONG S H, LIN T, NIEH J C, et al. Social signal learning of the waggle dance in honey bees[J]. Science, 2023, 379(6636): 1015-1018. DOI: 10.1126/science.ade1702 . |
| [23] | POWELL J E, MARTINSON V G, URBAN-MEAD K, et al. Routes of acquisition of the gut microbiota of the honey bee Apis mellifera [J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2014, 80(23): 7378-7387. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01861-14 . |
| [24] | 陈盛禄. 中国蜜蜂学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001. |
| CHEN S L. The Apicultural Science in China[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001. | |
| [25] | LOZUPONE C A, STOMBAUGH J I, GORDON J I, et al. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota[J]. Nature, 2012, 489(7415): 220-230. DOI: 10.1038/nature11550 . |
| [26] | SPILLMAN E C, SHEPHERD A K, KUANG M C, et al. Gut microbial metabolites link dietary history to appetite regulation[J]. J Neurogenet, 2025: 1-10. DOI: 10.1080/01677063. 2025.2548783 . |
| [27] | KNOP M, TREITZ C, BETTENDORF S, et al. Mitochondrial sirtuin 4 shapes the intestinal microbiota of Drosophila by controlling lysozyme expression[J]. Anim Microbiome, 2025, 7(1): 1-17. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-025-00431-x . |
| [28] | RIVERA D E, POIRIER K, MOORE S, et al. Dynamics of gut colonization by commensal and pathogenic bacteria that attach to the intestinal epithelium[J]. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes, 2025, 11(1): 1-15. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-025-00696-9 . |
| [29] | LI Y, BAI R J, ZHU Y, et al. Genetic variation in gut microbe as a key regulator of host social behavior in C. elegans [J]. Gut Microbes, 2025, 17(1): 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2490828 . |
| [30] | DOUGLAS A E. The Drosophila model for microbiome research[J]. Lab Anim, 2018, 47(6): 157-164. DOI: 10.1038/s41684-018-0065-0 . |
| [31] | DIRKSEN P, MARSH S A, BRAKER I, et al. The native microbiome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: gateway to a new host-microbiome model[J]. BMC Biol, 2016, 14(1): 1-16. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-016-0258-1 . |
| [32] | MENG Y J, ZHANG X, ZHAI Y F, et al. Identification of the mutual gliding locus as a factor for gut colonization in non-native bee hosts using the ARTP mutagenesis[J]. Microbiome, 2024, 12(1): 1-17. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-01813-0 . |
| [33] | HUANG Q, LARIVIERE P J, POWELL J E, et al. Engineered gut symbiont inhibits microsporidian parasite and improves honey bee survival[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2023, 120(25): 1-6. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2220922120 . |
| [34] | LANG H Y, WANG H, WANG H Q, et al. Engineered symbiotic bacteria interfering Nosema redox system inhibit microsporidia parasitism in honeybees[J]. Nat Commun, 2023, 14(1): 1-12. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38498-2 . |
| [35] | EVANS J D, ARONSTEIN K, CHEN Y P, et al. Immune pathways and defence mechanisms in honey bees Apis mellifera [J]. Insect Mol Biol, 2006, 15(5): 645-656. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00682.x . |
| [36] | WU J Q, LANG H Y, MU X H, et al. Honey bee genetics shape the strain-level structure of gut microbiota in social transmission[J]. Microbiome, 2021, 9(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01174-y . |
| [37] | TANG J B, ZUO W L, GUO L Z, et al. Synergistic pectin deconstruction is a prerequisite for mutualistic interactions between honeybee gut bacteria[J]. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 1-16. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51365-y . |
| [38] | KWONG W K, MORAN N A. Gut microbial communities of social bees[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2016, 14(6): 374-384. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.43 . |
| [39] | EMERY O, SCHMIDT K, ENGEL P. Immune system stimulation by the gut symbiont Frischella perrara in the honey bee (Apis mellifera)[J]. Mol Ecol, 2017, 26(9): 2576-2590. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14058 . |
| [40] | ZHENG H, POWELL J E, STEELE M I, et al. Honeybee gut microbiota promotes host weight gain via bacterial metabolism and hormonal signaling[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017, 114(18): 4775-4780. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701819114 . |
| [41] | LI W F, EVANS J D, LI J H, et al. Spore load and immune response of honey bees naturally infected by Nosema ceranae [J]. Parasitol Res, 2017, 116(12): 3265-3274. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-017-5630-8 . |
| [42] | BLOT N, VEILLAT L, ROUZÉ R, et al. Glyphosate, but not its metabolite AMPA, alters the honeybee gut microbiota[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(4): 1-16. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215466 . |
| [43] | HAN B F, HU J W, YANG C F, et al. Lactobacillus Firm-5-derived succinate prevents honeybees from having diabetes-like symptoms[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2024, 121(36): 1-11. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2405410121 . |
| [44] | JIN M J, BARRON A B, HE S Y, et al. Bombella intestini: a probiotic honeybee(Apis mellifera)gut bacterium[J]. J Insect Physiol, 2025, 164: 104836. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2025.104836 . |
| [45] | ZHONG Z P, MU X H, LANG H Y, et al. Gut symbiont-derived anandamide promotes reward learning in honeybees by activating the endocannabinoid pathway[J]. Cell Host Microbe, 2024, 32(11): 1944-1958, e1-e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2024.09.013 . |
| [46] | MINAHAN D, GOREN M, SHAFIR S. Unbalanced dietary omega-6: 3 ratio affects onset of nursing and nurse–larvae interactions by honey bees, Apis mellifera [J]. Anim Behav, 2024, 213: 235-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.05.007 . |
| [47] | RAYMANN K, BOBAY L M, MORAN N A. Antibiotics reduce genetic diversity of core species in the honeybee gut microbiome[J]. Mol Ecol, 2018, 27(8): 2057-2066. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14434 . |
| [48] | SBAGHDI T, GARNEAU J R, YERSIN S, et al. The response of the honey bee gut microbiota to Nosema ceranae is modulated by the probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici and the neonicotinoid thiamethoxam[J]. Microorganisms, 2024, 12(1): 1-14. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12010192 . |
| [49] | SHI J L, ZHANG Y H, LIU J H, et al. Larval antibiotic exposure causes persistent impacts on honeybees across life stages via metabolic succession[J]. J Hazard Mater, 2025, 497: 139628. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139628 . |
| [50] | ZHANG Z J, MU X H, CAO Q N, et al. Antibiotic exposure alters the honeybee gut microbiota and may interfere with the honeybee behavioral caste transition[J]. Insect Sci, 2025, 32(1): 260-276. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.13374 . |
| [51] | NOWAK A, SZCZUKA D, GÓRCZYŃSKA A, et al. Characteri-zation of Apis mellifera gastrointestinal microbiota and lactic acid bacteria for honeybee protection-a review[J]. Cells, 2021, 10(3): 701. DOI: 10.3390/cells10030701 . |
| [52] | HARIPRASATH K, MOHANKUMAR S, SUDHA M, et al. The role of honeybee gut and honey microbiome in sustainable bee and human health[J]. J Pure Appl Microbiol, 2025, 19(1): 19-33. DOI: 10.22207/jpam.19.1.03 . |
| [53] | 谢建芸. 东方田鼠作为一种实验动物新资源的研究进展报告[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(5): 482-491. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2023.114 . |
| XIE J Y. Research progress report on Microtus fortis as a new resource of laboratory animal[J]. Lab Anim Comp Med, 2023, 43(5): 482-491. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2023.114 . | |
| [54] | 杜小燕, 刘云波. 中国实验动物资源鉴定与评价工作进展分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2024, 44(5): 469-474. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.050 . |
| DU X Y, LIU Y B. Analysis of the progress in identification and evaluation of laboratory animal resources in China[J]. Lab Anim Comp Med, 2024, 44(5): 469-474. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.050 . |
| [1] | 潘林琴, 邓向亮, 罗云霞. 缺血性脑卒中动物模型的中西医整合转化研究进展[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(3): 344-356. |
| [2] | 陈兵, 谢晓婕, 陶体富, 王敬东, 邹弈星. 四川省实验动物从业人员培训教育现状及对策研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(3): 456-463. |
| [3] | 王秀然, 李浩, 陈正涛, 于杨, 张素英, 陶如, 王可洲. 医学院校实验动物专业“三位一体”人才培养体系建设的创新与实践[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(3): 446-455. |
| [4] | 陈林, 张厚森, 艾曼, 漆重阳. 数字化转型赋能江苏省实验动物管理高质量发展路径研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(3): 426-436. |
| [5] | 中国研究型医院学会医学动物实验专家委员会, 中国医药生物技术协会再生医学分会, 韩发彬, 陈琳, 陈志国, 卢明, 李英俊. 帕金森病药物和干细胞治疗临床前动物实验模型选择指南(2026年版)[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(2): 153-177. |
| [6] | 李慧. 生物语言学动物模型研究进展[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(2): 297-305. |
| [7] | 刘意抒, 蔡丽萍. 微创外科教育培训中实验动物使用的现状分析与替代技术探索[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(2): 279-287. |
| [8] | 王莹, 纪文韬, 徐少琼, 陈国元, 冯洁, 吴宝金. 实验动物屏障设施环境微生物污染情况的监测与分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(2): 222-230. |
| [9] | 杨琳, 金梦, 吴汗青, 李顺, 周晓辉. 痘苗病毒天坛株感染AG6小鼠脑病模型的建立与初步分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(1): 3-10. |
| [10] | 肖芳平, 熊莉娟, 贾菠, 刘欢, 罗勇兵, 万筱荣. 2020—2024年江西省实验动物的微生物、寄生虫检测结果分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(1): 119-126. |
| [11] | 廖望钥, 雷爽, 李璇, 郭闵, 周若然. 注意缺陷多动障碍动物模型文献分析及效度评价[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(1): 66-80. |
| [12] | 李晓琴, 余文兰, 段依竺, 刘忠华, 吴国栋, 史文琦, 富宏坤. 中国实验动物科技伦理治理体系构建与广东省实践初探[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(1): 127-137. |
| [13] | 陈子宜, 孙红燕, 康品方, 武文娟. 肺动脉高压动物模型构建方法及新型技术研究进展[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(1): 81-93. |
| [14] | 杨韵蓉, 吴文郁, 谭跃, 严国锋, 李垚, 卢今. 脑卒中动物模型构建与评价方法评述[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(1): 94-106. |
| [15] | 刘松, 莫倩茹, 王瑾, 崔颖, 田铃. 黑水虻的主要生物学特性及其作为模式生物的开发应用前景[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2025, 45(6): 803-809. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||