实验动物与比较医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 251-260.DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.095
收稿日期:2025-06-19
修回日期:2025-10-16
出版日期:2026-04-25
发布日期:2026-04-18
通讯作者:
徐国恒(1964—),男,博士,教授,研究方向:生理学、脂肪生成与脂肪分解调节。E-mail: xug@bimu.edu.cn作者简介:吴宪文(1986—),女,博士,主管技师,研究方向:实验动物遗传育种与群体繁育基础。E-mail: wuxianwen@bimu.edu.cn。ORCID:0009-0004-0007-5907
刘丽丽(1997—),女,硕士研究生,研究方向:动物遗传育种。E-mail: 1805979990@qq.com
基金资助:
WU Xianwen(
), LIU Lili, CHEN Ye, XU Guoheng(
)
Received:2025-06-19
Revised:2025-10-16
Published:2026-04-25
Online:2026-04-18
Contact:
XU Guoheng, E-mail: xug@bimu.edu.cn摘要:
目的 确定21日龄SPF级C57BL/6J小鼠在屏障环境内开放式笼盒饲养模式下,离乳后分笼饲养时刨花垫料的合理铺设高度及换笼周期方案。 方法 通过设置3组垫料(平均高度3 cm、4 cm、5 cm),形成6个实验组(雌性、雄性小鼠各3组,每组各60只小鼠,每盒20只小鼠,共计18个笼盒),根据GB 14925—2023《实验动物 环境及设施》中最大饲养密度要求进行饲养,连续监测21~54日龄小鼠的体重、采食量、污物量及垫料清洁度等指标。 结果 在21~54日龄阶段,4 cm组雄性小鼠在42日龄的体重极显著高于3 cm和5 cm组(P<0.01);在45~54日龄,4 cm组雄性小鼠的污物量显著高于3 cm组(P<0.05)。各垫料高度组间雌性小鼠体重、采食量及污物量差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。性别比较结果显示,雄性小鼠在部分日龄段的体重、采食量及污物量均显著高于雌性小鼠(P<0.05);雌性、雄性小鼠间的清洁度评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3 cm和4 cm组小鼠在饲养第6天~第12天时评分接近3分,5 cm组小鼠在饲养第12 d时接近3分;小鼠42日龄后各组清洁度评分迅速升高,需将换笼周期缩短至4 d。综合以上,建议3 cm和4 cm组小鼠的换笼周期为6 d,5 cm组小鼠的换笼周期可延长至12 d;42日龄后各垫料高度组小鼠的换笼周期均需缩短至4 d。 结论 在开放式笼盒饲养模式下,育成阶段采用4 cm垫料高度结合6 d换笼周期,既能通过垫料吸附维持笼盒清洁度,又可优化垫料资源使用量。该方案成功平衡了动物福利保障与设施运营效率,适用于C57BL/6J及遗传背景相似的近交系小鼠规模化饲养管理。
中图分类号:
吴宪文,刘丽丽,陈烨,等. 繁育体系中育成期小鼠换笼周期及刨花垫料使用量的优化研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(2): 251-260. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.095.
WU Xianwen,LIU Lili,CHEN Ye,et al. Optimization of Cage-Changing Intervals and Wood Shavings Usage for Mice During the Growth Phase in Breeding Systems[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2026, 46(2): 251-260. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.095.
评分/分 Score/point | 垫料状态 Bedding condition | 粪便堆积情况 Fecal accumulation |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 干净、干燥、松散 | 无可见粪便 |
| 1 | 颜色轻微加深 | 少量(约占垫料总体积的2%) |
| 2 | 颜色加深至黄褐色 | 在一角有明显堆积 |
| 3 | 明显变色,黄褐色加深 | 堆积量约占笼盒底面积的1/3,可见黑色粪粒堆积 |
| 4 | 深褐色 | 集中堆积于一侧,约占笼盒面积的1/2 |
| 5 | 严重污染 | 分布于笼盒两角及中间区域,约占笼盒面积的2/3 |
表1 各组C57BL/6J雌性小鼠和雄性小鼠的笼盒清洁度评分标准
Table 1 Cage cleanliness scoring criteria for female and male C57BL/6J mice in each group
评分/分 Score/point | 垫料状态 Bedding condition | 粪便堆积情况 Fecal accumulation |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 干净、干燥、松散 | 无可见粪便 |
| 1 | 颜色轻微加深 | 少量(约占垫料总体积的2%) |
| 2 | 颜色加深至黄褐色 | 在一角有明显堆积 |
| 3 | 明显变色,黄褐色加深 | 堆积量约占笼盒底面积的1/3,可见黑色粪粒堆积 |
| 4 | 深褐色 | 集中堆积于一侧,约占笼盒面积的1/2 |
| 5 | 严重污染 | 分布于笼盒两角及中间区域,约占笼盒面积的2/3 |
)日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 21 | 8.12±0.23 | 8.89±0.28 | 8.35±0.29 | 8.37±0.34 | 6.59±0.34 | 8.38±0.50 | ||
| 24 | 9.31±0.33 | 10.01±0.56 | 9.34±0.25 | 9.81±0.41 | 8.12±0.58 | 9.38±0.47 | ||
| 27 | 11.59±0.32 | 12.79±0.30 | 11.80±0.38 | 11.48±0.33 | 11.93±0.70 | 12.07±0.49 | ||
| 30 | 14.54±0.33 | 13.86±0.52 | 14.80±0.49 | 14.31±0.41 | 13.85±0.73 | 14.41±0.43 | ||
| 33 | 16.55±0.44 | 15.76±0.41 | 17.25±0.69* | 15.06±0.39 | 16.08±0.49 | 15.68±0.23 | ||
| 36 | 18.41±0.28* | 15.98±0.42 | 18.47±0.62** | 16.18±0.42 | 17.38±0.32* | 16.22±0.33 | ||
| 39 | 19.75±0.28* | 17.15±0.41 | 19.97±0.42 | 17.13±0.39 | 18.12±0.29** | 17.03±0.23 | ||
| 42 | 20.06±0.28* | 17.39±0.23 | 20.75±0.41a** | 17.87±0.20 | 19.58±0.26** | 17.60±0.23 | ||
| 45 | 20.51±0.39** | 16.39±0.33 | 20.29±0.30** | 16.87±0.14 | 20.65±0.77** | 16.60±0.09 | ||
| 48 | 21.04±0.34** | 16.53±0.32 | 21.75±0.35** | 16.91±0.13 | 20.97±0.65** | 16.50±0.22 | ||
| 51 | 22.01±0.36** | 16.95±0.23 | 21.97±0.28** | 17.34±0.08 | 21.68±0.53** | 17.05±0.03 | ||
| 54 | 22.58±0.16** | 17.38±0.29 | 22.35±0.16** | 17.64±0.05 | 22.15±0.35** | 17.25±0.10 | ||
表2 不同实验组21~54日龄C57BL/6J雄性小鼠和雌性小鼠的体重变化以及雄性小鼠和雌性小鼠的体重对比 (
)
Table 2 Body weight changes of C57BL/6J male mice and female mice aged 21 - 54 days in different experimental groups and comparison of body weight between males and females
日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 21 | 8.12±0.23 | 8.89±0.28 | 8.35±0.29 | 8.37±0.34 | 6.59±0.34 | 8.38±0.50 | ||
| 24 | 9.31±0.33 | 10.01±0.56 | 9.34±0.25 | 9.81±0.41 | 8.12±0.58 | 9.38±0.47 | ||
| 27 | 11.59±0.32 | 12.79±0.30 | 11.80±0.38 | 11.48±0.33 | 11.93±0.70 | 12.07±0.49 | ||
| 30 | 14.54±0.33 | 13.86±0.52 | 14.80±0.49 | 14.31±0.41 | 13.85±0.73 | 14.41±0.43 | ||
| 33 | 16.55±0.44 | 15.76±0.41 | 17.25±0.69* | 15.06±0.39 | 16.08±0.49 | 15.68±0.23 | ||
| 36 | 18.41±0.28* | 15.98±0.42 | 18.47±0.62** | 16.18±0.42 | 17.38±0.32* | 16.22±0.33 | ||
| 39 | 19.75±0.28* | 17.15±0.41 | 19.97±0.42 | 17.13±0.39 | 18.12±0.29** | 17.03±0.23 | ||
| 42 | 20.06±0.28* | 17.39±0.23 | 20.75±0.41a** | 17.87±0.20 | 19.58±0.26** | 17.60±0.23 | ||
| 45 | 20.51±0.39** | 16.39±0.33 | 20.29±0.30** | 16.87±0.14 | 20.65±0.77** | 16.60±0.09 | ||
| 48 | 21.04±0.34** | 16.53±0.32 | 21.75±0.35** | 16.91±0.13 | 20.97±0.65** | 16.50±0.22 | ||
| 51 | 22.01±0.36** | 16.95±0.23 | 21.97±0.28** | 17.34±0.08 | 21.68±0.53** | 17.05±0.03 | ||
| 54 | 22.58±0.16** | 17.38±0.29 | 22.35±0.16** | 17.64±0.05 | 22.15±0.35** | 17.25±0.10 | ||
)日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 24 | 50.67±1.33 | 65.26±1.73 | 75.13±1.73 | 75.72±1.33 | 61.32±1.22 | 74.76±1.22 | ||
| 27 | 101.26±1.45 | 112.33±1.22 | 120.27±1.22 | 120.34±1.45 | 100.23±2.98 | 110.54±2.98 | ||
| 30 | 119.33±2.98 | 132.16±2.11 | 132.78±2.11 | 138.14±2.98 | 132.66±2.88 | 132.32±2.88 | ||
| 33 | 141.55±2.22* | 136.25±3.98 | 149.62±3.98 | 141.27±2.22 | 143.38±2.23 | 142.36±2.23 | ||
| 36 | 149.23±3.88** | 137.43±3.55 | 164.37±3.55 | 141.96±3.88 | 159.47±3.96* | 151.28±3.96 | ||
| 39 | 161.47±2.23* | 138.45±2.66 | 168.39±2.66 | 150.22±2.23 | 170.25±3.74** | 155.33±3.74 | ||
| 42 | 157.36±4.65** | 140.71±4.74 | 164.96±4.74** | 145.63±4.65 | 173.74±4.11** | 150.46±4.11 | ||
| 45 | 145.33±6.18 | 141.33±4.67 | 143.00±5.57 | 108.33±3.51 | 151.00±4.73** | 113.00±3.90 | ||
| 48 | 162.67±4.26** | 135.67±2.60 | 168.00±3.51* | 134.33±14.67 | 161.33±5.70 | 140.33±3.18 | ||
| 51 | 159.00±2.08 | 130.33±1.45 | 165.33±1.45** | 127.33±11.20 | 159.33±6.36* | 139.00±0.58 | ||
| 54 | 169.33±4.81 | 140.67±3.84 | 155.67±18.48* | 147.00±3.79 | 165.33±6.12 | 148.33±1.45 | ||
表3 不同实验组24~54日龄C57BL/6J雄性小鼠和雌性小鼠的采食量变化以及雄性小鼠和雌性小鼠的采食量对比 (
)
Table 3 Changes in food intake of male and female C57BL/6J mice aged 24–54 days in different experimental groups, and comparison of food intake between males and females
日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 24 | 50.67±1.33 | 65.26±1.73 | 75.13±1.73 | 75.72±1.33 | 61.32±1.22 | 74.76±1.22 | ||
| 27 | 101.26±1.45 | 112.33±1.22 | 120.27±1.22 | 120.34±1.45 | 100.23±2.98 | 110.54±2.98 | ||
| 30 | 119.33±2.98 | 132.16±2.11 | 132.78±2.11 | 138.14±2.98 | 132.66±2.88 | 132.32±2.88 | ||
| 33 | 141.55±2.22* | 136.25±3.98 | 149.62±3.98 | 141.27±2.22 | 143.38±2.23 | 142.36±2.23 | ||
| 36 | 149.23±3.88** | 137.43±3.55 | 164.37±3.55 | 141.96±3.88 | 159.47±3.96* | 151.28±3.96 | ||
| 39 | 161.47±2.23* | 138.45±2.66 | 168.39±2.66 | 150.22±2.23 | 170.25±3.74** | 155.33±3.74 | ||
| 42 | 157.36±4.65** | 140.71±4.74 | 164.96±4.74** | 145.63±4.65 | 173.74±4.11** | 150.46±4.11 | ||
| 45 | 145.33±6.18 | 141.33±4.67 | 143.00±5.57 | 108.33±3.51 | 151.00±4.73** | 113.00±3.90 | ||
| 48 | 162.67±4.26** | 135.67±2.60 | 168.00±3.51* | 134.33±14.67 | 161.33±5.70 | 140.33±3.18 | ||
| 51 | 159.00±2.08 | 130.33±1.45 | 165.33±1.45** | 127.33±11.20 | 159.33±6.36* | 139.00±0.58 | ||
| 54 | 169.33±4.81 | 140.67±3.84 | 155.67±18.48* | 147.00±3.79 | 165.33±6.12 | 148.33±1.45 | ||
)日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 24 | 39.37±1.25 | 33.47±0.56 | 40.26±0.44 | 32.36±0.88 | 46.35±1.11 | 42.22±0.77 | ||
| 27 | 47.28±0.98 | 36.32±0.78 | 60.25±0.57 | 40.53±0.65 | 49.60±0.84 | 48.37±0.78 | ||
| 30 | 52.44±0.88 | 44.23±0.66 | 62.71±1.21 | 43.27±1.32 | 59.58±0.65 | 50.46±1.21 | ||
| 33 | 66.71±0.79 | 48.37±1.23 | 67.33±0.98 | 52.18±0.85 | 65.47±0.32 | 54.32±1.22 | ||
| 36 | 79.38±1.33* | 55.26±1.11 | 78.64±0.78** | 63.26±1.11 | 69.36±0.44* | 62.17±0.98 | ||
| 39 | 80.62±1.11** | 59.35±0.96 | 85.62±0.65 | 63.94±0.66 | 72.41±0.97** | 65.39±0.79 | ||
| 42 | 85.47±0.94** | 62.44±0.84 | 87.31±1.33** | 64.58±1.31 | 84.25±0.98* | 69.20±0.88 | ||
| 45 | 43.67±6.23 | 43.00±3.51 | 61.67±2.67a | 34.33±2.04 | 52.33±1.86 | 40.00±3.06 | ||
| 48 | 50.33±6.44 | 49.33±2.67 | 64.33±2.19a | 38.67±2.93 | 54.33±1.33 | 43.67±3.28 | ||
| 51 | 63.33±2.85 | 51.62±3.00 | 76.33±2.03a | 49.26±2.65 | 68.67±4.67 | 56.67±2.33 | ||
| 54 | 77.67±1.45 | 70.75±1.73 | 92.33±1.20a | 75.71±2.51 | 85.00±6.03 | 73.33±2.90 | ||
表4 不同实验组24~54日龄C57BL/6J雄性小鼠和雌性小鼠的污物量变化以及雄性小鼠和雌性小鼠的污物量对比 (
)
Table 4 Changes in waste load of male and female C57BL/6J mice aged 24–54 days in different experimental groups, and comparison of waste load between males and females
日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 24 | 39.37±1.25 | 33.47±0.56 | 40.26±0.44 | 32.36±0.88 | 46.35±1.11 | 42.22±0.77 | ||
| 27 | 47.28±0.98 | 36.32±0.78 | 60.25±0.57 | 40.53±0.65 | 49.60±0.84 | 48.37±0.78 | ||
| 30 | 52.44±0.88 | 44.23±0.66 | 62.71±1.21 | 43.27±1.32 | 59.58±0.65 | 50.46±1.21 | ||
| 33 | 66.71±0.79 | 48.37±1.23 | 67.33±0.98 | 52.18±0.85 | 65.47±0.32 | 54.32±1.22 | ||
| 36 | 79.38±1.33* | 55.26±1.11 | 78.64±0.78** | 63.26±1.11 | 69.36±0.44* | 62.17±0.98 | ||
| 39 | 80.62±1.11** | 59.35±0.96 | 85.62±0.65 | 63.94±0.66 | 72.41±0.97** | 65.39±0.79 | ||
| 42 | 85.47±0.94** | 62.44±0.84 | 87.31±1.33** | 64.58±1.31 | 84.25±0.98* | 69.20±0.88 | ||
| 45 | 43.67±6.23 | 43.00±3.51 | 61.67±2.67a | 34.33±2.04 | 52.33±1.86 | 40.00±3.06 | ||
| 48 | 50.33±6.44 | 49.33±2.67 | 64.33±2.19a | 38.67±2.93 | 54.33±1.33 | 43.67±3.28 | ||
| 51 | 63.33±2.85 | 51.62±3.00 | 76.33±2.03a | 49.26±2.65 | 68.67±4.67 | 56.67±2.33 | ||
| 54 | 77.67±1.45 | 70.75±1.73 | 92.33±1.20a | 75.71±2.51 | 85.00±6.03 | 73.33±2.90 | ||
)时间/d(日龄/d) Time/d (Age in days/d) | 3 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 3 cm group/points | 4 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 4 cm group/points | 5 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 5 cm group/points | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 3 (24) | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | ||
| 6 (27) | 2.30±0.57 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | ||
| 9 (30) | 2.60±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | ||
| 12 (33) | 3.30±0.57 | 3.00±0.00 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | ||
| 15 (36) | 4.30±0.57 | 4.30±0.57 | 3.60±0.57 | 3.30±0.57 | 3.00±0.00 | 3.00±0.00 | ||
| 18 (39) | 4.60±0.57 | 4.60±0.57 | 4.30±0.57 | 4.00±0.00 | 3.60±0.57 | 3.30±0.57 | ||
| 21 (42) | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 | ||
表5 不同实验组C57BL/6J雌性小鼠和雄性小鼠持续饲养不同时长后的垫料清洁度变化 (
)
Table 5 Changes in bedding cleanliness for female and male C57BL/6J mice in different experimental groups after different durations of continuous housing
时间/d(日龄/d) Time/d (Age in days/d) | 3 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 3 cm group/points | 4 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 4 cm group/points | 5 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 5 cm group/points | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 3 (24) | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | ||
| 6 (27) | 2.30±0.57 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | ||
| 9 (30) | 2.60±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | ||
| 12 (33) | 3.30±0.57 | 3.00±0.00 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | ||
| 15 (36) | 4.30±0.57 | 4.30±0.57 | 3.60±0.57 | 3.30±0.57 | 3.00±0.00 | 3.00±0.00 | ||
| 18 (39) | 4.60±0.57 | 4.60±0.57 | 4.30±0.57 | 4.00±0.00 | 3.60±0.57 | 3.30±0.57 | ||
| 21 (42) | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 | ||
| [1] | 高婷婷, 孙天奇, 刘鑫鑫, 等. SPF级大鼠、小鼠IVC饲养系统玉米芯垫料使用量的探讨[J]. 实验动物科学, 2022, 39(2):59-64. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2022.02.010 . |
| GAO T T, SUN T Q, LIU X X, et al. Study on the amount of corncob bedding in IVC system of SPF rats and mice[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 2022, 39(2):59-64. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2022.02.010 . | |
| [2] | JONES T, THAWEETHAI T, MOLK D, et al. Evaluation and refinement of a spot-change–only cage management system for mice[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2022, 61(6):650-659. DOI: 10.30802/aalas-jaalas-22-000023 . |
| [3] | 李保文, 梁春南, 黎绍明. 玉米芯垫料替代刨花垫料后动物的换窝频度[J]. 实验动物科学, 2009, 26(4):65-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2009.04.018 . |
| LI B W, LIANG C N, LI S M. A scientific bedding-changing procedure by replacing wood-shavings with corn cob[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 2009, 26(4):65-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2009.04.018 . | |
| [4] | BURN C C, MASON G J. Absorbencies of six different rodent beddings: commercially advertised absorbencies are potentially misleading[J]. Lab Anim, 2005, 39(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1258/0023677052886592 . |
| [5] | BAUMANS V, VAN LOO P L P. How to improve housing conditions of laboratory animals: the possibilities of environmental refinement[J]. Vet J, 2013, 195(1):24-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.09.023 . |
| [6] | FERRECCHIA C E, JENSEN K, VAN ANDEL R. Intracage ammonia levels in static and individually ventilated cages housing C57BL/6 mice on 4 bedding substrates[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2014, 53(2):146-151. DOI: 10.1017/S0022149X12000831 . |
| [7] | 詹红微, 王福金, 刘亚奇, 等. 三种SPF小鼠垫料的比较[J]. 实验动物科学, 2012, 29(2):21-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2012.02.007 . |
| ZHAN H W, WANG F J, LIU Y Q, et al. Comparison of three beddings for specific pathogen free mice[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 2012, 29(2):21-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2012.02.007 . | |
| [8] | ESKANDARANI M A, HAU J, KALLIOKOSKI O. Rapid ammonia build-up in small individually ventilated mouse cages cannot be overcome by adjusting the amount of bedding[J]. Lab Anim, 2023, 52(6):130-135. DOI: 10.1038/s41684-023-01179-0 . |
| [9] | RATUSKI A S, AMÉNDOLA L, MAKOWSKA I J, et al. Effects of temporary access to environmental enrichment on measures of laboratory mouse welfare[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65480-9 . |
| [10] | SMITH A J, LILLEY E. The role of the three rs in improving the planning and reproducibility of animal experiments[J]. Animals, 2019, 9(11):1-8. DOI: 10.3390/ani9110975 . |
| [11] | FESTING M F W. The "completely randomised" and the "randomised block" are the only experimental designs suitable for widespread use in pre-clinical research[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10:1-5. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74538-3 . |
| [12] | MÄHLER CONVENOR M, BERARD M, FEINSTEIN R, et al. FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units[J]. Lab Anim, 2014, 48(3):178-192. DOI: 10.1177/0023677213516312 . |
| [13] | TAYLOR J L, NOEL P, MICKELSEN M. Evaluation of a 16-week change cycle for ventilated mouse cages[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2019, 58(4):443-449. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000070 . |
| [14] | ROSENBAUM M D, VANDEWOUDE S, JOHNSON T E. Effects of cage-change frequency and bedding volume on mice and their microenvironment[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2009, 48(6):763-773. |
| [15] | CARPENTER K C, THURSTON S E, HOENERHOFF M J, et al. Effects of trio and pair breeding of mice on environmental parameters and nasal pathology and their implications for cage change frequency[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2020, 59(3):288-297. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000074 . |
| [16] | DOMER D A, ERICKSON R L, PETTY J M, et al. Processing and treatment of corncob bedding affects cage-change frequency for C57BL/6 mice[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2012, 51(2):162-169. DOI: 10.1177/1040638711435232 . |
| [17] | RIVERO G, CIENFUEGOS J A, RODRÍGUEZ A, et al. Sex- and depot-dependent differences in adipocyte morphology and gene expression in diet-induced obesity[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2025, 230: 112958. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112958 . |
| [18] | RANEA-ROBLES P, LUND C, SVENDSEN C, et al. Time-resolved effects of short-term overfeeding on energy balance in mice[J]. Diabetes, 2025, 74(4): 502-513. DOI: 10.2337/db24-0289 . |
| [19] | ULFHAKE B, LERAT H, HONETSCHLAGER J, et al. A multicentre study on spontaneous in-cage activity and micro-environmental conditions of IVC housed C57BL/6J mice during consecutive cycles of bi-weekly cage-change[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(5): 1-34. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267281 . |
| [20] | WILSON L A B, ZAJITSCHEK S R K, LAGISZ M, et al. Sex differences in allometry for phenotypic traits in mice indicate that females are not scaled males[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35266-6 . |
| [21] | FREYMANN J, TSAI P P, STELZER H, et al. The amount of cage bedding preferred by female BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice[J]. Lab Anim, 2015, 44(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1038/laban.659 . |
| [1] | 徐英韬, 王蒙蒙, 林平, 迟海涛, 王怡, 白鹰. 外泌体通过NRF2/SLC7A11/GPX4通路调控铁死亡治疗小鼠缺血性脑卒中[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2026, 46(1): 20-31. |
| [2] | 张一粟, 刘欣茹, 武若杰, 刘睿, 欧阳红, 李晓红. 慢性不可预知性应激与完全弗氏佐剂、福尔马林诱导的妊娠期疼痛-抑郁共病小鼠模型的构建与评价[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2024, 44(3): 259-269. |
| [3] | 梁敏, 郭洋, 王津津, 朱梦妍, 池骏, 陈艳娟, 王成稷, 喻智澜, 沈如凌. Dmd基因突变小鼠构建及在肌肉及免疫系统的表型验证[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2024, 44(1): 42-51. |
| [4] | 李晗, 张笑瑞, 张成芳. 间歇禁食法在改善奥氮平诱导小鼠代谢紊乱中的机制研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(1): 3-10. |
| [5] | 李自发, 张浩, 任萌, 徐凯勇, 胡明会, 周苗苗, 王可洲. 槲皮素对镉致小鼠肝脏脂质代谢紊乱模型的保护效应[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2021, 41(4): 305-312. |
| [6] | 洪胜辉, 张旭亮, 王芊芊, 刘 平, 刘迪文. 抑制素基因敲除小鼠模型的构建及表型初步分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2020, 40(4): 306-. |
| [7] | 李雷斌, 许 佳, 方远书, 姜正前, 裘颖儿, 王文倩, 赵先哲. 基于自发糖尿病模型小鼠代谢组学的全植物蛋白配方饲料研究#br#[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2020, 40(3): 204-. |
| [8] | 雷山, 刘强, 黄维金, 王佑春. 小鼠品系、性别和被毛对可视化假病毒感染模型的影响[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2019, 39(6): 423-428. |
| [9] | 牛博文, 陈丽香, 朱孟敏, 彭秀华, 秦波音, 李峰. C57BL/6J背景基因修饰小鼠精子冷冻保种及品系恢复方法[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2019, 39(2): 146-150. |
| [10] | 杨华, 赵亚娟, 欧强. 非酒精性脂肪性肝纤维化小鼠模型的建立及炎症因子的表达[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2017, 37(1): 20-24. |
| [11] | 赵晨, 张双琴, 王利凤, 李薇. 还原型谷胱甘肽对C57BL/6J小鼠体外受精的影响[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2016, 36(3): 208-211. |
| [12] | 赵勇, 张璐, 蔡丽萍, 徐晨. 小鼠侧脑室埋管给药方法的优化[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2014, 34(2): 153-155. |
| [13] | 张璐, 赵懿宁, 袁子彦, 赵善民, 林丽芳, 汤球, 孙伟, 余琛琳, 蔡丽萍, 徐晨, 崔淑芳. 裸鼹鼠与C57BL/6J小鼠肾脏组织结构及超微结构比较[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2013, 33(5): 388-394. |
| [14] | 左宝芬, 杜小燕, 霍学云, 李振坤, 陈振文. 五个C57BL/6J小鼠生产群的微卫星检测及遗传学质量分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2012, 32(1): 51-55. |
| [15] | 肖楠1,赵微2,巴彩凤2,苏荣健1,苏玉虹1,3. DMD模型小鼠基因突变及肌肉亚型表达特点研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2008, 28(6): 356-360. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||