2020版美国兽医协会动物安乐死指南解析

doi:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2021.086

实验动物与比较医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 195-206.DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2021.086

所属专题：专家论坛；实验动物伦理与福利专辑

• 创刊40周年专题:标准与指南 • 上一篇下一篇

2020版美国兽医协会动物安乐死指南解析

卢今¹, 张颖², 潘学营³, 王剑¹, 严国锋¹, 周晶¹, 朱莲¹, 陈学进^1,4, 李垚¹, 庞万勇⁵

1.上海交通大学医学院实验动物科学部,上海 200025;
2.北京海关,北京 100026;
3.上海益诺思生物技术股份有限公司,上海 201203;
4.香港中文大学（深圳）生命与健康学院,深圳 518172;
5.赛诺菲公司全球研发中心转化体内模型研究平台,北京 100022

收稿日期:2021-04-25 修回日期:2021-05-31 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-07-05
作者简介:卢今(1990—), 女, 兽医学硕士, 研究方向: 实验动物医学。E-mail: ashleelu@shsmu.edu.cn

A Brief Interpretation of AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition

LU Jin¹, ZHANG Ying², PAN Xueying³, WANG Jian¹, YAN Guofeng¹, ZHOU Jing¹, ZHU Lian¹, CHEN Xuejin^1,4, LI Yao¹, PANG Wanyong⁵

1. Department of Laboratory Animal Science, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China;
2. Beijing Customs District P.R.China, Beijing 100026, China;
3. Shanghai Innostar Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201203, China;
4. School of Life and Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518172, China;
5. Translational In Vivo Model Research Platform,Sanofi G&D, Beijing 100022, China

Received:2021-04-25 Revised:2021-05-31 Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 巴比妥酸盐及其衍生物的过量注射是绝大多数动物种类首选的安乐死方法,然而在此类药物不能或很难获得时,兽医可参考美国兽医协会现行版《动物安乐死指南》（AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals）（简称《指南》）选用其他合适的安乐死方法。2020版《指南》根据最新的研究文献,对现有的安乐死方法、技术和药物进行补充及修改。本文总结了2020版《指南》的更新内容,并在此基础上归纳列举了适用于常见实验动物种类的首选安乐死方法、条件性接受安乐死方法和不可接受的安乐死方法,另外简述了实施动物安乐死的基本原则和注意事项。

关键词: 实验动物, 安乐死, 可接受性安乐死方法, 条件性接受安乐死方法, 注意事项

Abstract: Overdose of injectable barbiturates or barbituric acid derivatives is the most preferred euthanasia method for the majority of animal species. However, these controlled drugs have limited access, and in this case or in any other scientific concerns, veterinarians may choose alternative, conditional acceptable methods as recommended by American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. In the newest 2020 Edition, existing euthanasia methods, techniques and agents of euthanasia are updated according to recently released articles. This article summarized the updated content of the new version of the AVMA Guidelines and on this basis, enumerated the most preferred methods of euthanasia, methods acceptable with conditions and unacceptable methods to euthanize different animal species. In addition, principles and precautions related to animal euthanasia were also briefly described.

Key words: Laboratory animal, Euthanasia, Acceptable euthanasia methods, Euthanasia methods acceptable with conditions, Precautions

中图分类号:

Q95-33
R-332

卢今, 张颖, 潘学营, 王剑, 严国锋, 周晶, 朱莲, 陈学进, 李垚, 庞万勇. 2020版美国兽医协会动物安乐死指南解析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2021, 41(3): 195-206.

LU Jin, ZHANG Ying, PAN Xueying, WANG Jian, YAN Guofeng, ZHOU Jing, ZHU Lian, CHEN Xuejin, LI Yao, PANG Wanyong. A Brief Interpretation of AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2021, 41(3): 195-206.

图/表 2

参考文献

[1] LEARY S, UNDERWOOD W, ANTHONY R, et al.AVMA Guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2020 Edition[M]. Schaumburg: American Veterinary Medical Association, 2020.
[2] DANNEMAN P J, MANDRELL T D.Evaluation of five agents/methods for anesthesia of neonatal rats[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 1997, 47(4):386-395.
[3] SILVERMAN J, HENDRICKS G.Sensory neuron development in mouse coccygeal vertebrae and its relationship to tail biopsies for genotyping[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(2): e88158. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0088158.
[4] FITZGERALD M.The development of nociceptive circuits[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2005, 6(7):507-520. DOI:10.1038/nrn1701.
[5] LEARY S, UNDERWOOD W, ANTHONY R, et al.AVMA Guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2013 Edition[M]. Schaumburg: American Veterinary Medical Association, 2013.
[6] HICKMAN D L, JOHNSON S W.Evaluation of the aesthetics of physical methods of euthanasia of anesthetized rats[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2011, 50(5):695-701.
[7] MAKOWSKA J, GOLLEDGE H, MARQUARDT N, et al.Sedation or inhalant anesthesia before euthanasia with CO₂ does not reduce behavioral or physiologic signs of pain and stress in mice[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Animal Sci, 2012, 51(4):396-397.
[8] HEWETT T A, KOVACS M S, ARTWOHL J E, et al.A comparison of euthanasia methods in rats, using carbon dioxide in prefilled and fixed flow rate filled chambers[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 1993, 43(6):579-582.
[9] HICKMAN D L, FITZ S D, BERNABE C S, et al.Evaluation of low versus high volume per minute displacement CO₂ methods of euthanasia in the induction and duration of panic-associated behavior and physiology[J]. Animals (Basel), 2016, 6(8):E45. DOI:10.3390/ani6080045.
[10] BOIVIN G P, BOTTOMLEY M A, DUDLEY E S, et al.Physiological, behavioral, and histological responses of male C57BL/6N mice to different CO₂ chamber replacement rates[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2016, 55(4):451-461.
[11] POWELL K, ETHUN K, TAYLOR D K.The effect of light level, CO₂ flow rate, and anesthesia on the stress response of mice during CO₂ euthanasia[J]. Lab Animal, 2016, 45(10):386-395. DOI:10.1038/laban.1117.
[12] WALSH J, PERCIVAL A, TURNER P.Efficacy of blunt force trauma, a novel mechanical cervical dislocation device, and a non-penetrating captive bolt device for on-farm euthanasia of pre-weaned kits, growers, and adult commercial meat rabbits[J]. Animals, 2017, 7(12):100. DOI:10.3390/ani7120100.
[13] CARTNER S C, BARLOW S C, NESS T J.Loss of cortical function in mice after decapitation, cervical dislocation, potassium chloride injection, and CO₂ inhalation[J]. Comp Med, 2007, 57(6):570-573.
[14] Leica Biosystems. Decapitator Rodent[Z]. (2020-05-31). https://www.leicabiosystems.com/research/neuroscience/sample-preparation/products/decapitator/.
[15] POOLE G H, FLETCHER D L.A comparison of Argon, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen in a broiler killing system[J]. Poult Sci, 1995, 74(7):1218-1223. DOI:10.3382/ps.0741218.
[16] RAJ A B, WHITTINGTON P E.Euthanasia of day-old chicks with carbon dioxide and Argon[J]. Vet Rec, 1995, 136(12):292-294. DOI:10.1136/vr.136.12.292.
[17] CASEY-TROTT T M, MILLMAN S T, TURNER P V, et al. Effectiveness of a nonpenetrating captive bolt for euthanasia of 3 kg to 9 kg pigs[J]. J Anim Sci, 2014, 92(11):5166-5174. DOI:10.2527/jas.2014-7980.
[18] SCHÜTT-ABRAHAM I, KNAUER-KRAETZL B, WORMUTH H J. Observations during captive bolt stunning of rabbits[J]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 1992, 105(1):10-15.
[19] MEYER R E, WHITLEY J T, MORROW W E M, et al. Effect of physical and inhaled euthanasia methods on hormonal measures of stress in pigs[J]. J Swine Health Prod, 2013, 21(5):261-269.
[20] VALENTIM A M, GUEDES S R, PEREIRA A M, et al.Euthanasia using gaseous agents in laboratory rodents[J]. Lab Anim, 2016, 50(4):241-253. DOI:10.1177/0023677215618618.
[21] HEDENQVIST P, ROUGHAN J V, ANTUNES L, et al.Induction of anaesthesia with desflurane and isoflurane in the rabbit[J]. Lab Anim, 2001, 35(2):172-179. DOI:10.1258/0023677011911561.
[22] FLECKNELL P A, ROUGHAN J V, HEDENQVIST P.Induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane in the rabbit[J]. Lab Anim, 1999, 33(1):41-46. DOI:10.1258/002367799780578516.
[23] SHARP J L, ZAMMIT T G, AZAR T A, et al.Stress-like responses to common procedures in male rats housed alone or with other rats[J]. Contemp Top Lab Animal Sci, 2002, 41(4):8-14.
[24] BOIVIN G P, HICKMAN D L, CREAMER-HENTE M A, et al. Review of CO₂ as a euthanasia agent for laboratory rats and mice[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2017, 56(5):491-499.
[25] PRITCHETT-CORNING K R. Euthanasia of neonatal rats with carbon dioxide[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2009, 48(1):23-27.
[26] LORD R.Use of ethanol for euthanasia of mice[J]. Aust Vet J, 1989, 66(8):268. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1989.tb13590.x.
[27] ALLEN-WORTHINGTON K H, BRICE A K, MARX J O, et al. Intraperitoneal injection of ethanol for the euthanasia of laboratory mice (Mus musculus) and rats (Rattus norvegicus)[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2015, 54(6):769-778.
[28] DE SOUZA DYER C, BRICE A K, MARX J O. Intraperitoneal administration of ethanol as a means of euthanasia for neonatal mice (Mus musculus)[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2017, 56(3): 299-306.
[29] BALKO J A, ODA A, POSNER L P.Use of tricaine methanesulfonate or propofol for immersion euthanasia of goldfish (Carassius auratus)[J]. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 2018, 252(12):1555-1561. DOI:10.2460/javma.252.12.1555.
[30] WILSON J M, BUNTE R M, CARTY A J.Evaluation of rapid cooling and tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) as methods of euthanasia in zebrafish (Danio rerio)[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2009, 48(6):785-789.
[31] COLLYMORE C, BANKS E K, TURNER P V.Lidocaine hydrochloride compared with MS222 for the euthanasia of zebrafish (Danio rerio)[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2016, 55(6):816-820.
[32] Office of Animal Care and Use. Guidelines for use of zebrafish in the NIH intramural research program[M]. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health, 2009.
[33] TORREILLES S L, MCCLURE D E, GREEN S L.Evaluation and refinement of euthanasia methods for Xenopus laevis[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2009, 48(5):512-516.
[34] DUTTON J W 3rd, ARTWOHL J E, HUANG X C, et al. Assessment of pain associated with the injection of sodium pentobarbital in laboratory mice (Mus musculus)[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2019, 58(3):373-379. DOI:10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000094.
[35] KHOO S Y, LAY B P P, JOYA J, et al. Local anaesthetic refinement of pentobarbital euthanasia reduces abdominal writhing without affecting immunohistochemical endpoints in rats[J]. Lab Anim, 2018, 52(2):152-162. DOI:10.1177/0023677217721260.
[36] SVENDSEN O, KOK L, LAURITZEN B.Nociception after intraperitoneal injection of a sodium pentobarbitone formulation with and without lidocaine in rats quantified by expression of neuronal c-fos in the spinal cord: a preliminary study[J]. Lab Animals, 2007, 41(2):197-203. DOI:10.1258/002367707780378140.
[37] 卢选成. 美国兽医协会动物安乐死指南2013版(翻译版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2019.

2020版美国兽医协会动物安乐死指南解析

A Brief Interpretation of AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵亚, 张彩勤, 孟寒, 秦靖, 白冰, 赵勇, 葛煦, 师长宏. 课程思政视域下实验动物学教学实践探索[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(6): 641-646.
[2]	谢建芸. 东方田鼠作为一种实验动物新资源的研究进展报告[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(5): 482-491.
[3]	赵勇. 实验动物管理工作的沿革与展望——以上海市近10年发展为例[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(5): 492-503.
[4]	谢淑武, 沈如凌, 林金杏, 范春. 雄性不育药物研发相关实验动物模型建立和应用进展[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(5): 504-511.
[5]	郭连香. 实验动物微生物、寄生虫学等级及监测标准的变化及与国外标准的比较[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(4): 339-346.
[6]	黄缨, 韦思羽, 蔡莉, 强苏静, 李冬婷, 丁玉强. 供应商来源的实验大鼠和小鼠微生物监测结果分析：以复旦大学实验动物科学部为例[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(4): 347-354.
[7]	刘晓宇, 卢选成, 师晓萌, 张雨舟, 吕超, 陈国元, 卢晓, 白玉, 高静, 李垚, 刘永刚, 陶雨风, 庞万勇. 《动物研究：体内实验报告》即ARRIVE 2.0指南的解释与阐述（三）[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(4): 446-456.
[8]	苟欢, 安新颖, 童俞嘉, 王琰, 杨爽. 日本实验动物发展现状分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(2): 194-204.
[9]	何永平, 谢美贤, 庞智慧, 李庆秀, 何华红, 张讷敏, 李薇. 实验用猫的驯化及繁殖方法初步研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(1): 67-72.
[10]	漆重阳, 陈林, 艾曼, 徐航, 张厚森. 基于江苏省实验动物行政许可现状的安全管理对策[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2023, 43(1): 79-85.
[11]	李夏莹, 韦玉生, 田永路, 庞万勇. 2022版加拿大动物人道终点指南解析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(6): 566-571.
[12]	乔涵, 魏杰, 王菲菲, 王洪, 邢进, 付瑞, 肖镜, 赵萌, 岳秉飞, 项新华. 2013—2022年实验动物检测能力验证样品的回顾性研究[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(6): 483-489.
[13]	王剑, 卢今, 陶凌云, 富宏坤, 高诚, 吴宝金, 李垚, 陶雨风. 实验动物临床检验项目中血液学、血液生化和尿液分析认可能力范围表述规范化浅析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(6): 511-517.
[14]	于志强, 王晶晶, 富宏坤, 王翠娥, 陶雨风. 兽医病理学检测领域CNAS认可能力范围表述浅析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(6): 518-525.
[15]	李会萍, 梁楚军, 赵维波. 广东省实验动物许可证管理现状[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(6): 577-582.