实验动物与比较医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 206-213.DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.126

• 实验动物与职业健康专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

国内普通高校实验动物从业人员职业健康风险防控概述

张倩, 邓青秀()(), 蔡林   

  1. 成都中医药大学实验动物研究中心, 成都 610032
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-26 修回日期:2024-12-11 出版日期:2025-04-25 发布日期:2025-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 邓青秀(1975—),女,博士研究生,高级实验师,研究方向:疾病动物模型与中药复方研究。E-mail: 1042097157@qq.com。ORCID:0009-0007-8630-6041
  • 作者简介:张 倩(1998—),女,硕士研究生,助理实验师,研究方向:实验动物质量控制。E-mail: zhangqian05171@163.com

Review on Occupational Health Risk Prevention and Control for Laboratory Animal Practitioners in Chinese General Universities

ZHANG Qian, DENG Qingxiu()(), CAI Lin   

  1. Laboratory Animal Research Center, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610032, China
  • Received:2024-08-26 Revised:2024-12-11 Published:2025-04-25 Online:2025-04-25
  • Contact: DENG Qingxiu (ORCID: 0009-0007-8630-6041), E-mail: 1042097157@qq.com

摘要:

随着国内实验动物行业的飞速发展,动物实验成为高校科研成果产出和课堂教学的重要辅助手段,实验动物从业人员队伍也日益壮大。虽然近年来国家开始重视实验动物从业人员职业健康,并出台了相关的法规政策,但是现阶段高校针对实验动物从业人员的职业健康风险防控还处于薄弱环节。因此,笔者围绕高校实验动物研究中心管理规范,通过走访、座谈以及学术交流,对国内9家普通高校实验动物从业人员的职业健康管理与防护现状进行了深入调研,揭示了高校实验动物从业人员面临的5大职业健康风险,包括实验动物过敏症、人兽共患传染病、机械性损伤、化学性刺激以及心理因素,指出当前高校普遍存在管理体系不健全、风险评估机制缺失和防护设施不足等核心问题。针对上述问题,本研究提出了三级防控体系:在高校层面,需健全制度并加大经费投入;在实验动物中心层面,应建立动物生物安全实验室,并强化危险源管控、应急预案演练与健康监护;在实验动物从业人员层面,需规范防护装备使用,参与职业健康培训,严格执行安全操作规程,及时上报职业暴露事件。在多方协作的基础上,笔者尝试分析并探讨构建国内普通高校科学、高效的职业健康保障体系的可行路径,以期为实验动物行业的可持续发展提供理论支撑与实践参考。

关键词: 普通高校, 实验动物从业人员, 职业健康, 风险防控

Abstract:

With the rapid development of the laboratory animal industry in China, animal experimentation has become a crucial tool for both scientific research output and classroom teaching in universities. Correspondingly, the workforce engaged in laboratory animal work has expanded significantly. In recent years, while the Chinese government has begun to emphasize the occupational health of laboratory animal practitioners by introducing relevant laws and policies, current prevention and control efforts within universities remain insufficient. This study conducted an in-depth investigation into the occupational health management and protection of laboratory animal practitioners in nine general universities in China, focusing on the management standards within university laboratory animal research centers. The research was carried out through field visits, interviews, and academic exchanges, focusing on standardized management practices within university laboratory animal research centers. The findings highlight five major occupational health risks faced by these practitioners: laboratory animal allergy, zoonotic infectious diseases, mechanical injuries, chemical exposures, and psychological factors. Key challenges identified include underdeveloped management systems, a lack of risk assessment mechanisms, and inadequate protective facilities. To address these issues, the study proposes a three-tiered prevention and control framework. At the university level, institutions should establish comprehensive regulatory systems and increase funding investment. At the laboratory animal center level, biosafety laboratories should be developed, risk source management strengthened, and emergency preparedness and health monitoring enhanced. At the level of individual practitioners, appropriate use of personal protective equipment should be enforced, occupational health training should be provided, standard operating procedures should be strictly followed, and occupational exposure incidents should be reported promptly. Through multi-party collaboration, this study explores feasible paths for constructing a scientific and efficient occupational health protection system in domestic universities, aiming to provide theoretical support and practical references for the sustainable development of the laboratory animal industry in China.

Key words: General university, Laboratory animal practitioners, Occupational health, Risk prevention

中图分类号: