Application of Virtual Reality in the Behavior Analysis of Laboratory Animal

doi:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2022.078

Abstract

Abstract:

Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging technology for computer scene simulation that has become a reliable tool for animal behavior analysis in recent years. The behavior of an animal is crucial for its survival. Animal behavior analysis provides useful information for scientific progress in genetics, ecology, neuroscience, economics, and robotics. Animal behavior analysis can be divided into open-loop studies, in which the stimulus is independent of the animal's response to the stimulus, and closed-loop studies, in which the stimulus is adjusted according to the real-time movement of the animal. In this paper, we have discussed the origin, concept, and applications of animal behavior analysis, and reviewed the shortcomings of open-loop research on animal behavior represented by visual stimulation using traditional technology. Then taking visual, olfactory, tactile, and auditory stimulation as examples, we analyzed that the animal behavior analysis system using VR technology could combine precise experimental control with the complex behavior of laboratory animals, and complete the closed-loop research that could not be achieved using the experimental methods of the real physical world. The prospect of VR in developing superior simulations and virtual animals in the future was also discussed.

Key words: Virtual reality, Open-loop control system, Closed-loop control system, Animal behavior, Virtual animals

CLC Number:

Q95-33

Chaochao ZHANG, Xuesong TIAN. Application of Virtual Reality in the Behavior Analysis of Laboratory Animal[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(1): 73-78.

References 29

1	ANN K. The what, how, and why of naturalistic behavior[J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2022, 74:102549. DOI:10.1016/j.conb.2022.102549 .
2	NAIK H, BASTIEN R, NAVAB N, et al. Animals in virtual environments[J]. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 2020, 26(5):2073-2083. DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2020.2973063 .
3	DENAYER T, STÖHR T, VAN ROY M. Animal models in translational medicine: validation and prediction[J]. New Horizons Transl Med, 2014, 2(1):5-11. DOI:10.1016/j.nhtm.2014.08.001 .
4	DOMBECK D A, REISER M B. Real neuroscience in virtual worlds[J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2012, 22(1):3-10. DOI:10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.015 .
5	RIVA G, MALIGHETTI C, SERINO S. Virtual reality in the treatment of eating disorders[J]. Clin Psychol Psychother, 2021, 28(3):477-488. DOI:10.1002/cpp.2622 .
6	SAWYER A, GLEESON A. Animal models and virtual reality[J]. BioTechniques, 2018, 65(2):55-60. DOI:10.2144/btn-2018-0104 .
7	POPOV V V, KUDRYAVTSEVA E V, KUMAR KATIYAR N, et al. Industry 4.0 and digitalisation in healthcare[J]. Materials (Basel), 2022, 15(6):2140. DOI:10.3390/ma15062140 .
8	TARR M J, WARREN W H. Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2002, 5(11):1089-1092. DOI:10.1038/nn948 .
9	TINBERGEN N, PERDECK A C. On the stimulus situation releasing the begging response in the newly hatched herring gull chick (Larus argentatus argentatus pont.)[J]. Behaviour, 1951, 3(1):1-39. DOI:10.1163/156853951x00197 .
10	GYGER M, KARAKASHIAN S J, MARLER P. Avian alarm calling: is there an audience effect? [J]. Animal Behav, 1986, 34(5):1570-1572. DOI:10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80229-9 .
11	D'EATH R B. Can video images imitate real stimuli in animal behaviour experiments? [J]. Biol Rev, 2007, 73(3):267-292. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1998.tb00031.x .
12	ABDELJALIL J, HAMID M, ABDEL-MOUTTALIB O, et al. The optomotor response: a robust first-line visual screening method for mice[J]. Vis Res, 2005, 45(11):1439-1446. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2004.12.015 .
13	JENSSEN T A. Female response to filmed displays of Anolis nebulosus (Sauria, Iguanidae)[J]. Animal Behav, 1970, 18:640-647. DOI:10.1016/0003-3472(70)90007-2 .
14	IOANNOU C C, GUTTAL V, COUZIN I D. Predatory fish select for coordinated collective motion in virtual prey[J]. Science, 2012, 337(6099):1212-1215. DOI:10.1126/science.1218919 .
15	THURLEY K, AYAZ A. Virtual reality systems for rodents[J]. Curr Zool, 2016, 63(1):109-119. DOI:10.1093/cz/zow070 .
16	HÖLSCHER C, SCHNEE A, DAHMEN H, et al. Rats are able to navigate in virtual environments[J]. J Exp Biol, 2005, 208(Pt 3):561-569. DOI:10.1242/jeb.01371 .
17	THURLEY K, HENKE J, HERMANN J, et al. Mongolian gerbils learn to navigate in complex virtual spaces[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2014, 266:161-168. DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2014.03.007 .
18	RADVANSKY B A, DOMBECK D A. An olfactory virtual reality system for mice[J]. Nat Commun, 2018, 9:839. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-03262-4 .
19	URSULA K, KAY T, KATJA F, et al. Spatial cognition in a virtual reality home-cage extension for freely moving rodents[J]. J Neurophysiol, 2017, 117(4):1736-1748. DOI:10.1152/jn.00630.2016 .
20	PINTO L, KOAY S A, ENGELHARD B, et al. An accumulation-of-evidence task using visual pulses for mice navigating in virtual reality[J]. Front Behav Neurosci, 2018, 12:36. DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00036 .
21	SOFRONIEW N J, SVOBODA K. Whisking[J]. Curr Biol, 2015, 25(4): R137-R140. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.008 .
22	SOFRONIEW N J, VLASOV Y A, HIRES S A, et al. Neural coding in barrel cortex during whisker-guided locomotion[J]. eLife, 2015, 4: e12559. DOI:10.7554/eLife.12559 .
23	GAO S B, WEBB J, MRIDHA Z, et al. Novel virtual reality system for auditory tasks in head-fixed mice[J]. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2020: 2925-2928. DOI:10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176536 .
24	CUSHMAN J D, AHARONI D B, WILLERS B, et al. Multisensory control of multimodal behavior: do the legs know what the tongue is doing? [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(11): e80465. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0080465 .
25	LOPATINA O L, MORGUN A V, GORINA Y V, et al. Current approaches to modeling the virtual reality in rodents for the assessment of brain plasticity and behavior[J]. J Neurosci Methods, 2020, 335:108616. DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108616 .
26	FELDSTEIN I T, ELLIS S R. A simple video-based technique for measuring latency in virtual reality or teleoperation[J]. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 2021, 27(9):3611-3625. DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2020.2980527 .
27	PASSINI E, BRITTON O J, LU H R, et al. Human In silico drug trials demonstrate higher accuracy than animal models in predicting clinical pro-arrhythmic cardiotoxicity[J]. Front Physiol, 2017, 8:668. DOI:10.3389/fphys.2017.00668 .
28	GUPTA R, SRIVASTAVA D, SAHU M, et al. Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery[J]. Mol Divers, 2021, 25(3):1315-1360. DOI:10.1007/s11030-021-10217-3 .
29	BROWN J W, CAETANO-ANOLLÉS D, CATANHO M, et al. Implementing goal-directed foraging decisions of a simpler nervous system in simulation[J]. eNeuro, 2018, 5(1): ENEURO.0400-17.2018. DOI:10.1523/ENEURO. 0400-17.2018

[1]	Xi FANG, Qingqing AO, Chunhong LI, Yiqiang OUYANG, Songchao GUO, Bing HU. Metabolomics Analysis of Tupaia belangeri Breast Tumor Model [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(1): 52-61.
[2]	Yue HUANG, Ye DONG, Jiale SHU. Discussion on the Operation, Maintenance and Care Modes of Laboratory Animals Facilities [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(1): 92-96.
[3]	Min LIANG, Yang GUO, Jinjin WANG, Mengyan ZHU, Jun CHI, Yanjuan CHEN, Chengji WANG, Zhilan YU, Ruling SHEN. Construction of Dmd Gene Mutant Mice and Phenotype Verification in Muscle and Immune Systems [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(1): 42-51.
[4]	Jianhua ZHENG, Yunzhi FA, Qiaoyan DONG, Yefeng QIU, Jingqing CHEN. Construction and Evaluation of a Mouse Model with Intestinal Injury by Acute Hypoxic Stress in Plateau [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(1): 31-41.
[5]	Xin LIU, Shaobo SHI, Cui ZHANG, Bo YANG, Chuan QU. Construction and Evaluation of End-to-side Anastomosis Model of Autologous Arteriovenous Fistula in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(6): 595-603.
[6]	Yongqiang NIE, Zhaoxia WANG. Rescue Technology and Its Application of Endangered Gene-Edited Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(6): 636-640.
[7]	Ya ZHAO, Caiqin ZHANG, Han MENG, Jing QIN, Bing BAI, Yong ZHAO, Xu GE, Changhong SHI. Exploration of Laboratory Animal Science Teaching Practice from Perspectives of Curriculum Ideology and Politics [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(6): 641-646.
[8]	Yong ZHAO. Evolution and Prospects of Laboratory Animal Management: A Case Study of Shanghai's Development in the Past Decade [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 492-503.
[9]	Liping FENG, Qi ZHU, Jinxing LIN. Current Status and Reflection on the Study of Welfare for Laboratory Fish [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 524-530.
[10]	Jinxing LIN, Xindong WANG, Xuebing BAI, Liping FENG, Shuwu XIE, Qiusheng CHEN. Fine Structure of the Trunk Kidney and Distribution of Its Secreted Exosomes in the Adult Zebrafish [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 531-540.
[11]	Liya ZHAO, Liju NI, Caiqin ZHANG, Jianping TANG, Yangzheng YAO, Yanyan NIE, Xiaoxue GU, Ying ZHAO. Establishing a Genetic Detection Protocol of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Panels in Inbred Rats Based on Multiplex PCR-LDR [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 548-558.
[12]	Shuzhen ZHANG, Yanguang ZHAO. Investigation Report on the Production and Utilization Status of Experimental Mini-pigs [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 559-565.
[13]	Lingzhi YU, Jianyun XIE, Liping FENG, Xiaofeng WEI. Establishment of Fluorescence qPCR Method for Detection of Staphylococcus Aureus and Its Application in Feces Detection of Rats and Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 566-573.
[14]	Chengji WANG, Jue WANG, Haijie WANG, Weisheng LU, Yan SHI, Zhengye GU, Mingqiu WAN, Ruling SHEN. Application of Optimized Latex Perfusion Technique in the Establishment of Craniofacial Venous Model in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 574-578.
[15]	Lianxiang GUO. Revision of Standards for Microbiological and Parasitological Grades in Laboratory Animals and Its Comparison to Foreign Standards [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(4): 339-346.