游戏和被动测试对导盲犬培训成功率的预测效果评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5817.2015.03.007

实验动物与比较医学 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 212-217.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5817.2015.03.007

游戏和被动测试对导盲犬培训成功率的预测效果评价

张雅丽¹, 周子娟¹, 俞剑熊¹, 韩芳¹, 王亮¹, 姜新², 艾博¹, 王爱国¹, 王福金¹, 王靖宇¹

1.大连医科大学实验动物中心, 大连 116044;
2.通化师范学院分院, 通化 134000

收稿日期:2014-12-01 出版日期:2015-06-25 发布日期:2015-06-25
作者简介:张雅丽(1989-), 女, 硕士。研究方向: 动物行为学。E-mail: yaliandida@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(No.31272392)

Evaluation on Effects of Play and Passive Situation Tests in Predicting Training Successful Rate for Guide Dogs

ZHANG Ya-li¹, ZHOU Zi-juan¹, YU Jian-xiong¹, HAN Fang¹, WANG Liang¹, JIANG Xin², AI Bo¹, WANG Ai-guo¹, WANG Fu-jin¹, WANG Jing-yu¹

1. Laboratory Animal Center, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China;
2. Tonghua Normal University branch institute, Tonghua 134000, China

Received:2014-12-01 Online:2015-06-25 Published:2015-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的建立导盲犬游戏和被动测试的方法和评分标准,并检验其对导盲犬培训成功率的预测效果。方法参照犬的普通气质测试的方法,结合导盲犬的行为特点,建立测定导盲犬行为的游戏和被动测试方法,采用5个检测行为变量并制定相应的评分标准,分别为游戏测试中的“游戏兴趣,抓取,拔河”与被动测试中的“活跃程度I,活跃程度II”。通过对中国导盲犬大连培训基地的17只导盲犬和17只淘汰犬进行游戏和被动测试,验证其对导盲犬培训成功率的预测效果。结果统计分析显示,导盲犬与淘汰犬在被动测试变量“活跃程度I”的得分具有极显著差异(P=0.003),在被动测试变量“活跃程度II”的得分具有显著差异(P=0.014); 而在游戏测试变量“游戏兴趣,抓取,拔河”的得分无显著性差异(P>0.05),但淘汰犬的“游戏兴趣”得分有高于导盲犬的趋势。导盲犬和淘汰犬在1~2分,3~4分和5分3个分数段的分布情况的分析结果表明：在“游戏兴趣”中,得分在1~2分的导盲犬多于淘汰犬,得分为5分的导盲犬少于淘汰犬;而“抓取”中,导盲犬与淘汰犬得分趋势相近;在“拔河”中,得分为1~2分和5分的淘汰犬均多于导盲犬;在“活跃程度I”与“活跃程度II”中,得分为1~2分的导盲犬均多于淘汰犬,得分为3~4分的导盲犬数量均少于淘汰犬。结论本文成功建立了游戏和被动测试的方法和评分标准,其中变量“活跃程度I”和“活跃程度II”可作为预测导盲犬培训成功率的有效指标。

关键词: 导盲犬, 游戏测试, 被动测试, 培训成功率

Abstract: Objective To establish the methods and evaluation criterion for play and passive situation tests of DMA (dog mentality assessment) and detect their effects on predicting the training successful rate for guide dogs. Method According to the methods of common temperament tests and considering the behavior characteristics of guide dogs, the methods of play and passive situation tests for guide dogs’ behavior and the related evaluation criterion for 5 behavioral variables in total were established. The behavioral variables were Interest in play, grabbing, tug-of-war in play test and activity I and activity II in passive situation test. Seventeen guide dogs and 17 eliminated dogs from Chinese Guide Dogs Training Centre of Dalian were used to examine the predicting effects of the 5 behavioral variables on the training successful rate for guide dogs. Result According to the results of statistical analysis, the “activity I” in the passive situation test showed higher significant difference between guide dogs and eliminated dogs (P=0.003), and the “activity II” in the passive situation test showed significant difference (P=0.014). However, no significant difference was detected for the rest variables in play test between guide dogs and eliminated dogs (P>0.05). While, there were clear trends showed that the scores of eliminated dogs were higher than that of guide dogs in variable of Interest in play. The distribution analysis of the numbers of guide dogs and eliminated dogs in 3 different score grades (1~2 points, 3~4 points and 5 points) of each variable showed: for Interest in play, more guide dogs distributed in 1~2 points and less guide dogs distributed in 5 points compared to eliminated dogs; for grabbing, the distribution of guide dogs and eliminated dogs had a similar trend; for tug-of-war, more eliminated dogs distributed in 1~2 points and 5 points grade compared to guide dogs; for activity I and activity II, more guide dogs distributed in 1~2 points and less guide dogs distributed in 3~4 points compared to eliminated dogs. Conclusion The methods and evaluation criterion for play and passive situation test were successfully established. The “activity I” and “activity II” are confirmed as two effective variable indexes to predict the training successful rate for guide dogs.

Key words: Guide dogs, Play test, Passive situation test, Training successful rate

中图分类号:

Q95-33

张雅丽, 周子娟, 俞剑熊, 韩芳, 王亮, 姜新, 艾博, 王爱国, 王福金, 王靖宇. 游戏和被动测试对导盲犬培训成功率的预测效果评价[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2015, 35(3): 212-217.

ZHANG Ya-li, ZHOU Zi-juan, YU Jian-xiong, HAN Fang, WANG Liang, JIANG Xin, AI Bo, WANG Ai-guo, WANG Fu-jin, WANG Jing-yu. Evaluation on Effects of Play and Passive Situation Tests in Predicting Training Successful Rate for Guide Dogs[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2015, 35(3): 212-217.

参考文献

[1] 王爱国, 王福金, 王亮, 等. 气质测试在导盲犬培训中的应用[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2012, 44(2):45-47.
[2] 王福金, 王爱国, 王亮, 等. 偏侧性测试在预测成功导盲犬中的应用[J]. 实验动物科学, 2012, 29(3):57-60,63.
[3] 俞剑熊, 张雅丽, 周子娟, 等. 拉布拉多犬与金毛猎犬毛色基因MC1R(R306ter)与TYRP1(Q331ter)SNP位点的检测[J].实验动物科学, 2014, 31(2):37-41.
[4] Goddard ME, Beilharz RG.A factor-analysis of fearfulness in potential guide dogs[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 1984, 12(3):253-265.
[5] Goddard ME, Beilharz RG.The relationship of fearfulness to, and the effects of, sex, age and experience on exploration and activity in dogs[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 1984, 12(3):267-278.
[6] Goddard ME. Beilharz RG.Early prediction of adult behavior in potential guide dogs[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1986, 15(3):247-260.
[7] Knol BW, Roozendaal C. Vandenbogaard L, et al.The suitability of dogs as guide dogs for the blind: Criteria and testing procedures[J]. Vet Q, 1988, 10(3):198-204.
[8] Murphy JA.Assessment of the temperament of potential guide dogs[J]. Anthrozoos, 1995, 8(4):224-228.
[9] Svartberg K, Forkman B.Personality traits in the domestic dog[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2002, 79(2):133-155.
[10] Svartberg K.Shyness-boldness predicts performance in working dogs[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2002, 79(2):157-174.
[11] Lara SB, Batt MS, Baguley JA, et al.Factors associated with success in guide dog training[J]. J Vet Behav, 2008, 3(4): 143-151.
[12] Lara SB, BagSc (Hons), Marjolyn SB, et al. The relationships between motor lateralization, salivary cortisol concentrations and behavior in dogs[J]. J Vet Behav, 2009, 4(6):216-222.
[13] Claire D, Jean MG.Behavioural testing in dogs: A review of methodology in search for standardization[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2006, 97(1):51-72.
[14] De Meester RH, Pluijmakers J, Vermeire S, et al.The use of the socially acceptable behavior test in the study of temperament of dogs[J]. J Vet Behav, 2011, 6(4):211-224.
[15] Serpell JA, Hsu Y.Development and validation of a novel method for evaluation behaviour and temperament in guide dogs[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2001, 72(4):347-364.
[16] TopáJ, Miklósi A, Csányi V, et al. Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) strange situation test[J]. J Comp Psychol, 1998, 112(3):219-229.
[17] Fallani G, Previde EP, Valsecchi P.Do disrupted early attachments affect the relationship between guide dogs and blind owners[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2006, 100(3-4):241-257.
[18] Valli P, Sharon L.Relationship between attachment to owners and separation anxiety in pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)[J]. J Vet Behav, 2006, (1):109-120.
[19] Lara SB, Batt MS, Baguley JA, et al.The effects of structured sessions for juvenile training and socialization on guide dog success and puppy-raiser participation[J]. J Vet Behav, 2008, (3):199-206.
[20] Wilsson E, Sundgren P.The use of a behaviour test for the selection of dogs for service and breeding, I: Method of testing and evaluating test results in the adult dog, demands on different kinds of service dogs, sex and breed differences[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 1997, 53(4):279-295.

游戏和被动测试对导盲犬培训成功率的预测效果评价

Evaluation on Effects of Play and Passive Situation Tests in Predicting Training Successful Rate for Guide Dogs

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周子娟, 张雅丽, 韩芳, 俞剑熊, 王亮, 姜新, 王爱国, 王福金, 王靖宇. 社会接触测试对导盲犬培训成功率的预测效果评价[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2015, 35(3): 207-211.
[2]	张雅丽, 周子娟, 俞剑熊, 韩芳, 王亮, 姜新, 王爱国, 王福金, 王靖宇. 追逐和距离游戏测试对导盲犬培训成功率的预测效果评价[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2015, 35(2): 107-113.
[3]	周子娟, 张雅丽, 梁佳, 俞剑熊, 韩芳, 王亮, 王爱国, 王福金, 王靖宇. 寄养家庭对导盲犬培训成功率的影响[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2015, 35(1): 71-75.
[4]	詹红微, 王爱国, 姜新, 王亮, 邱泽文, 高文婷, 王福金, 王靖宇. 导盲犬运动偏侧性测试方法的比较[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2014, 34(6): 490-495.