Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 159-165.DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2021.082
• Laboratory Animal Welfare and Ethics • Previous Articles Next Articles
Chang WU1,2(
), Xiaojie LI2, Yinnan WU1,2, Yao WANG2, Yuxin WANG2, Weifeng ZONG2, Changhong MENG2(
), Yihong LU1,2(
)
Received:2021-04-12
Revised:2021-08-09
Online:2022-04-25
Published:2022-04-25
Contact:
Changhong MENG, Yihong LU
CLC Number:
Chang WU,Xiaojie LI,Yinnan WU,et al. Application of Isolated Guinea Pig Ileum Method for Detection of Histamine Substances in Osteopeptide Injections[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2022, 42(2): 159-165. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2021.082.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.slarc.org.cn/dwyx/EN/10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2021.082
| 制剂名 | 临床剂量/ (mg·kg-1) | 限值/ (μg·mg-1) | 低剂量组胺溶液质量浓度/ (μg·mL-1) | 高剂量组胺溶液质量浓度/ (μg·mL-1) | 给药质量浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 给药体积/ mL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 骨肽注射液 | 1.67 | 0.06 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 0.40 |
| 复方骨肽注射液 | 2.50 | 0.04 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 15.0 | 0.40 |
| 注射用骨肽 | 1.67 | 0.06 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 16.7 | 0.25 |
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | 3.33 | 0.03 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 33.0 | 0.25 |
Table 1 Experimental dose of histamine-like substances test by the isolated guinea pig ileum method
| 制剂名 | 临床剂量/ (mg·kg-1) | 限值/ (μg·mg-1) | 低剂量组胺溶液质量浓度/ (μg·mL-1) | 高剂量组胺溶液质量浓度/ (μg·mL-1) | 给药质量浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 给药体积/ mL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 骨肽注射液 | 1.67 | 0.06 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 0.40 |
| 复方骨肽注射液 | 2.50 | 0.04 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 15.0 | 0.40 |
| 注射用骨肽 | 1.67 | 0.06 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 16.7 | 0.25 |
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | 3.33 | 0.03 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 33.0 | 0.25 |
| 制剂名 | 给药剂量/ (mg·kg-1) | 临床剂量/ (mg·kg-1) | 临床剂量倍数 | 给药体积/(mL·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 骨肽注射液 | 2.5 | 1.67 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| 复方骨肽注射液 | 1.5 | 2.50 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 注射用骨肽 | 2.5 | 1.67 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | 1.0 | 3.33 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
Table 2 Experimental dose of cat depressor substance test
| 制剂名 | 给药剂量/ (mg·kg-1) | 临床剂量/ (mg·kg-1) | 临床剂量倍数 | 给药体积/(mL·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 骨肽注射液 | 2.5 | 1.67 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| 复方骨肽注射液 | 1.5 | 2.50 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 注射用骨肽 | 2.5 | 1.67 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | 1.0 | 3.33 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| 企业 | 制剂名 | 批次 | 豚鼠回肠收缩反应值/mm | dT与dS/2、dS比较 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dS | dT | dT | dS | ||||
| A | 复方骨肽注射液 | A-1 | 57.07 | 47.39 | 46.29 | 57.31 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| B | 复方骨肽注射液 | B-1 | 42.24 | 19.95 | 20.82 | 46.85 | dT<1/2dS |
| C | 骨肽注射液 | C-1 | 33.06 | 24.25 | 20.94 | 30.86 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| D | 骨肽注射液 | D-1 | 49.45 | 3.47 | 9.54 | 43.38 | dT<1/2dS |
| 注射用骨肽 | D-2 | 24.29 | 6.07 | 0.87 | 58.12 | dT<1/2dS | |
| E | 骨肽注射液 | E-1 | 40.22 | 18.39 | 19.54 | 34.47 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | E-2 | 70.53 | 50.70 | 44.08 | 87.07 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | |
Table 3 Results of histamine-like substance test in 7 batches of osteopeptide injections
| 企业 | 制剂名 | 批次 | 豚鼠回肠收缩反应值/mm | dT与dS/2、dS比较 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dS | dT | dT | dS | ||||
| A | 复方骨肽注射液 | A-1 | 57.07 | 47.39 | 46.29 | 57.31 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| B | 复方骨肽注射液 | B-1 | 42.24 | 19.95 | 20.82 | 46.85 | dT<1/2dS |
| C | 骨肽注射液 | C-1 | 33.06 | 24.25 | 20.94 | 30.86 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| D | 骨肽注射液 | D-1 | 49.45 | 3.47 | 9.54 | 43.38 | dT<1/2dS |
| 注射用骨肽 | D-2 | 24.29 | 6.07 | 0.87 | 58.12 | dT<1/2dS | |
| E | 骨肽注射液 | E-1 | 40.22 | 18.39 | 19.54 | 34.47 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | E-2 | 70.53 | 50.70 | 44.08 | 87.07 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | |
| 企业 | 制剂名 | 批次 | 猫血压下降数值/mmHg | dT与dS/2、dS比较 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dS | dT | dT | dS | ||||
| A | 复方骨肽注射液 | A-1 | 34.26 | 19.49 | 19.97 | 31.18 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| B | 复方骨肽注射液 | B-1 | 29.72 | 5.36 | 4.06 | 38.48 | dT<1/2dS |
| C | 骨肽注射液 | C-1 | 40.27 | 24.68 | 24.03 | 37.35 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| D | 骨肽注射液 | D-1 | 30.37 | 10.39 | 11.04 | 23.71 | dT<1/2dS |
| 注射用骨肽 | D-2 | 23.06 | 5.52 | 7.47 | 19.49 | dT<1/2dS | |
| E | 骨肽注射液 | E-1 | 39.78 | 43.84 | 43.52 | 36.37 | dT>dS |
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | E-2 | 32.15 | 19.81 | 17.54 | 24.84 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | |
Table 4 Results of depressor substance test in 7 batches of osteopeptide injections
| 企业 | 制剂名 | 批次 | 猫血压下降数值/mmHg | dT与dS/2、dS比较 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dS | dT | dT | dS | ||||
| A | 复方骨肽注射液 | A-1 | 34.26 | 19.49 | 19.97 | 31.18 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| B | 复方骨肽注射液 | B-1 | 29.72 | 5.36 | 4.06 | 38.48 | dT<1/2dS |
| C | 骨肽注射液 | C-1 | 40.27 | 24.68 | 24.03 | 37.35 | 1/2dS<dT<dS |
| D | 骨肽注射液 | D-1 | 30.37 | 10.39 | 11.04 | 23.71 | dT<1/2dS |
| 注射用骨肽 | D-2 | 23.06 | 5.52 | 7.47 | 19.49 | dT<1/2dS | |
| E | 骨肽注射液 | E-1 | 39.78 | 43.84 | 43.52 | 36.37 | dT>dS |
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | E-2 | 32.15 | 19.81 | 17.54 | 24.84 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | |
| 企业 | 制剂名 | 批次 | 检查项 | dT与dS/2、dS比较 | 结果判定 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 复方骨肽注射液 | A-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 |
| 降压物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 | |||
| B | 复方骨肽注射液 | B-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 |
| 降压物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 | |||
| C | 骨肽注射液 | C-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 |
| 降压物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 | |||
| D | 骨肽注射液 | D-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 |
| 降压物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 | |||
| 注射用骨肽 | D-2 | 组胺类物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 | |
| 降压物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 | |||
| E | 骨肽注射液 | E-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 |
| 降压物质检查 | dT>dS | 阳性 | |||
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | E-2 | 组胺类物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 | |
| 降压物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 |
Table 5 Comparison between histamine-like substance test and depressor substances test on 7 batches of osteopeptide injections
| 企业 | 制剂名 | 批次 | 检查项 | dT与dS/2、dS比较 | 结果判定 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 复方骨肽注射液 | A-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 |
| 降压物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 | |||
| B | 复方骨肽注射液 | B-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 |
| 降压物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 | |||
| C | 骨肽注射液 | C-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 |
| 降压物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 | |||
| D | 骨肽注射液 | D-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 |
| 降压物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 | |||
| 注射用骨肽 | D-2 | 组胺类物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 | |
| 降压物质检查 | dT<1/2dS | 阴性 | |||
| E | 骨肽注射液 | E-1 | 组胺类物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 |
| 降压物质检查 | dT>dS | 阳性 | |||
| 注射用骨瓜提取物 | E-2 | 组胺类物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 | |
| 降压物质检查 | 1/2dS<dT<dS | 可疑 |
| 1 | 李凤林, 李文汉. 组胺受体研究的进展[J]. 哈尔滨医科大学学报, 1983(2):85-89. |
| 2 | 马洁, 宋燕青. 骨肽注射液的临床应用及其药理作用[J]. 中国生化药物杂志, 2016, 36(2):16-18. |
| 3 | 李冶武. 骨肽和复方骨肽注射剂的不良反应分析[J]. 人人健康, 2018(4):222. |
| 4 | 国家药典委员会. 国家药品标准工作手册[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2013. |
| 5 | 付金凤, 齐洋. 猫血压法测定骨瓜提取物注射液降压物质方法的研究[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2011, 24(4):552-553. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2882.2011.04.016 . |
| 6 | 牛慧玲, 李庆忠. 骨肽注射液降压物质检查法研究[J]. 西北药学杂志, 2012, 27(6):538-540. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2407. 2012. 06.013 . |
| 7 | 吴贤生, 黄甘泉, 杨嘉俊, 等. 注射用促肝细胞生长素中组胺类物质检查和降压物质检查的比较研究[J]. 实验动物科学, 2019, 36(2):63-68. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2019.02.012 . |
| 8 | 国家药典委员会. 中国药典2020版. 四部 [S]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:182-183. |
| 9 | 国家药典委员会. 中国药典2020版. 四部 [S]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:516-520. |
| 10 | 吕晓君, 周大庆, 何开勇, 等. 不同药典降压物质检查方法的比较及试验要点浅析[J]. 中国药师, 2016, 19(8):1571-1573, 1580. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-049X.2016.08.048 . |
| 11 | European Pharmacopoeia Commission. European Pharmacopoeia (9.0) [S]. EDQM, 2017:195. |
| 12 | British Pharmacopoeia Commission. British Pharmacopoeia(BP9. 0) [S]. London: The Stationery Office, 2018. |
| 13 | 陈天焱, 邵文, 卢海霞. 降压物质检查法与组胺类物质检查法用于小牛血去蛋白提取物注射液质量控制的研究[J]. 中国药师, 2017, 20(12):2264-2266. |
| 14 | 贺争鸣, 李根平, 朱德生. 实验动物管理与使用指南[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016. |
| 15 | 刘明慧, 袁宝, 陈健, 等. 猫实验动物标准化的研究进展及探讨[J]. 吉林畜牧兽医, 2015, 36(2):29-30, 32. |
| 16 | 黎家敏,马佳丽,杨春,等. 实验兔和猫在降压物质检查中的比较研究[J]. 实验动物科学, 2020, 37(5):1-8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2020.05.001 . |
| 17 | 嵇扬, 张癸荣, 姜春来. 比格狗与猫对组胺降压作用敏感性的比较研究[J]. 中国药品标准, 2004, 5(2):38-39. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3656.2004.02.015 . |
| 18 | 滑志民, 张似青, 陈菊红, 等. 实验用猫的历史、发展现状及发展前景[J]. 上海畜牧兽医通讯, 2019(1):27-29. |
| 19 | 周立, 吕茂利, 吕文涛. 饲养犬、猫导致人兽共患寄生虫病的防治[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2012, 20(7):144-144, 147. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6567.2012.07.108 . |
| 20 | 邱鸿宇. 东北地区犬、猫人兽共患寄生虫的流行情况调查及风险因素分析[D]. 大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2020. |
| 21 | 胡楚元, 蔡拓, 吴军. 浅谈实验动物福利伦理工作现状及改进[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2018, 14(9):7-9. |
| 22 | 杨泽岸, 张媛, 吴彦霖, 等. 基于生物活性测定的骨肽类制剂质量评价方法[J].中国药事, 2019, 33(4):380-384. |
| 23 | 邓利娟, 梁成罡, 范慧红. 几种多组分生化药注射剂降压物质的探讨[J]. 中国药事, 2010, 24(6):546-549. |
| 24 | 黄甘泉, 吴贤生, 王凤姬, 等. 降压物质检查试验中家猫对组胺灵敏度分析[J]. 中国比较医学杂志, 2020, 30(6):83-87. DOI: 10. 3969 / j.issn.1671-7856. 2020. 06. 011 . |
| [1] | JIAO Qingzhen, WU Guihua, TANG Wen, FAN Fan, FENG Kai, YANG Chunxiang, QIAO Jian, DENG Sufang. Dynamic Monitoring and Analysis of Ammonia Concentration in Laboratory Animal Facilities Under Suspension of Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning System [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 490-495. |
| [2] | LIU Wentao, LUO Yanhong, LONG Yongxia, LUO Qihui, CHEN Zhengli, LIU Lida. Common Environmental Problems and Testing Experiences in Laboratory Animal Facilities in Sichuan Province [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 483-489. |
| [3] | ZHAO Xin, WANG Chenxi, SHI Wenqing, LOU Yuefen. Advances in the Application of Zebrafish in the Research of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Mechanisms and Drug Development [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 422-431. |
| [4] | GONG Leilei, WANG Xiaoxia, FENG Xuewei, LI Xinlei, ZHAO Han, ZHANG Xueyan, FENG Xin. A Mouse Model and Mechanism Study of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency Induced by Different Concentrations of Cyclophosphamide [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 403-410. |
| [5] | LIN Zhenhua, CHU Xiangyu, WEI Zhenxi, DONG Chuanjun, ZHAO Zenglin, SUN Xiaoxia, LI Qingyu, ZHANG Qi. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Bone Cement in Experimental Pigs Using Vertebroplasty [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 466-472. |
| [6] | JIANG Juan, SONG Ning, LIAN Wenbo, SHAO Congcong, GU Wenwen, SHI Yan. Comparison of Histopathological and Molecular Pathological Phenotypes in Mouse Models of Intrauterine Adhesions Induced by Two Concentrations of Ethanol Perfusion [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 393-402. |
| [7] | LIU Yueqin, XUE Weiguo, WANG Shuyou, SHEN Yaohua, JIA Shuyong, WANG Guangjun, SONG Xiaojing. Observation of Digestive Tract Tissue Morphology in Mice Using Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 457-465. |
| [8] | ZHENG Qingyong, YANG Donghua, MA Zhichao, ZHOU Ziyu, LU Yang, WANG Jingyu, XING Lina, KANG Yingying, DU Li, ZHAO Chunxiang, DI Baoshan, TIAN Jinhui. Recommendations for Standardized Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Animal Experiments [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 496-507. |
| [9] | WANG Tingjun, LUO Hao, CHEN Qi. Discussion on AI-Based Digital Upgrade and Application Practice of Laboratory Animal Centers [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 473-482. |
| [10] | WANG Jiaoxiang, ZHANG Lu, CHEN Shuhan, JIAO Deling, ZHAO Heng, WEI Taiyun, GUO Jianxiong, XU Kaixiang, WEI Hongjiang. Construction and Functional Validation of GTKO/hCD55 Gene-Edited Xenotransplant Donor Pigs [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 379-392. |
| [11] | QIN Chao, LI Shuangxing, ZHAO Tingting, JIANG Chenchen, ZHAO Jing, YANG Yanwei, LIN Zhi, WANG Sanlong, WEN Hairuo. Study on the 90-day Feeding Experimental Background Data of SD Rats for Drug Safety Evaluation [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 439-448. |
| [12] | LIU Kun, LAN Qing, YI Bing, XIE Xiaojie. Key Challenges and Mitigation Strategies for Animal Pregnancy in Non-clinical Reproductive Toxicity Testing of Drugs [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 449-456. |
| [13] | . [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 508-514. |
| [14] | CHEN Ziyi, SUN Hongyan, KANG Pinfang, WU Wenjuan. Research Advances in Animal Experimental Models of Pulmonary Hypertension [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, (): 1-12. |
| [15] | XU Yingtao, WANG Mengmeng, LIN Ping, CHI Haitao, WANG Yi, BAI Ying. Exosomes Improve Ischemic Stroke by Regulation of Ferroptosis Through the NRF2/SLC7A11/GPX4 Pathway in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, (): 1-11. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||