Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine

• XXXX XXXX •    

Precautions for Conducting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Animal Experiments

ZHENG Qingyong1,2,3()(), YANG Donghua1,2,3,4, MA Zhichao5, ZHOU Ziyu5, LU Yang6, WANG Jingyu1,7, XING Lina1,2,3, KANG Yingying1,2,3, DU Li8, ZHAO Chunxiang9, DI Baoshan10,11, TIAN Jinhui1,2,3()()   

  1. 1.Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    2.Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
    3.Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    4.Department of Public Health and Healthcare-associated Infection Management, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining 810001, China
    5.The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    6.Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China
    7.Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    8.The Third People's Hospital of Lanzhou, Lanzhou 730050, China
    9.The First People's Hospital of Lanzhou City, Lanzhou 730050, China
    10.The First Clinical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China
    11.Department of Emergency, Shenzhen Longgang Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518116, China
  • Online:2025-05-16
  • Contact: TIAN Jinhui

Abstract:

Animal experiments play a pivotal role in life sciences and medical research. However, due to small sample sizes, high heterogeneity in experimental design, and limited reproducibility, the generalizability and reliability of their results are often questioned. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, as essential tools of evidence-based medicine, integrate multiple studies to enhance the scientific rigor and clinical relevance of animal research. This paper systematically reviews the writing process for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments, covering key aspects such as preparation, structured writing of titles and abstracts, introduction, methodology, results presentation, and discussion. Additionally, this paper incorporates existing reporting guidelines (e.g., PRISMA, SYRCLE, ARRIVE) to propose strategies for optimizing manuscript preparation, with particular emphasis on recommendations for discussing result interpretation, heterogeneity, publication bias, and the extrapolative validity of findings. By summarizing practical experience and offering modular writing recommendations, this paper aims to provide researchers with a comprehensive reference to promote the standardization of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments, thereby enhancing their value in scientific research and clinical translation.

Key words: Animal experiment, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Evidence-based medicine, Writing standards

CLC Number: