Comparison of Histopathological and Molecular Pathological Phenotypes in Mouse Models of Intrauterine Adhesions Induced by Two Concentrations of Ethanol Perfusion

doi:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.183

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To construct intrauterine adhesion (IUA) mouse models induced by two different concentrations of ethanol injury, compare the phenotypes, and optimize a more stable IUA modeling method. Methods Twenty 8-week-old female C57BL/6N mice were randomly divided into two groups: the 95% ethanol injury group and the 50% ethanol injury group. Using a self-control method, the left uterine horn was infused with ethanol to establish the IUA model, while the right uterine horn was infused with saline as the sham operation. Five mice from each group were euthanized on day 7 and 15 after modeling, and uterine tissues were collected. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining was used to observe the endometrial pathology, and Masson staining was used to assess the degree of endometrial fibrosis. Quantitative real-time PCR was employed to detect the expression levels of fibrosis markers and pro-inflammatory factors in the uterine tissues. Results Compared to the sham operation, these two ethanol injury led to a significant reduction in elasticity of the uterus, an increase in inflammatory infiltration, and a marked increase in the degree of fibrosis on day 7 after modeling (P<0.05). The 95% ethanol injury group showed a significant decrease in endometrial thickness (P<0.05), whereas no significant change was observed in the 50% ethanol injury group when compared to the sham operation (P>0.05). The expression levels of fibrotic marker molecules collagen type Ⅳ alpha 1 chain (Col4A1), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and pro-inflammatory factors tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) were significantly elevated in the 50% ethanol injury group when compared to the sham operation (P<0.05), although there was an increasing trend of the same markers in the 95% ethanol injury group, the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). On day 15 after modeling, the histopathological changes in both ethanol injury groups were not significant when compared to the sham operation, the expression levels of Col4A1, TGF-β, TNF-α and IL-1β remained significantly higher in the 50% ethanol injury group (P<0.05), while only IL-1β was significantly elevated in the 95% ethanol injury group (P<0.05). Conclusion Uterine infusion with 95% ethanol results in more marked histopathological changes in the IUA mouse model compared to the 50% ethanol injury group. The 95% ethanol injury model is suitable for histopathological studies. However, the 50% ethanol injury group shows higher expression levels of fibrosis markers and pro-inflammatory factors compared to the 95% ethanol injury group, suggesting that the 50% ethanol injury model is more suitable for molecular pathological study.

Key words: Intrauterine adhesions, Mouse model, Inflammatory factors, Fibrosis, Ethanol

CLC Number:

Q95-33

JIANG Juan,SONG Ning,LIAN Wenbo,et al. Comparison of Histopathological and Molecular Pathological Phenotypes in Mouse Models of Intrauterine Adhesions Induced by Two Concentrations of Ethanol Perfusion[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 393-402. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.183.

Figures/Tables 4

References 25

[1]	帕提曼·米吉提, 范余娟. 宫腔粘连的病因学研究及预防措施探讨[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2024, 16(7):32-35. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2024.07.08 .
	PATIMAN M J T, FAN Y J. Etiological research and preventive measures of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Chin J Fam Plan Gynecotokology, 2024, 16(7):32-35. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2024.07.08 .
[2]	HAN Q X, DU Y Z. Advances in the application of biomimetic endometrium interfaces for uterine bioengineering in female infertility[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8:153. DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00153 .
[3]	SANTAMARIA X, ISAACSON K, SIMÓN C. Asherman's syndrome: it may not be all our fault[J]. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(8):1374-1380. DOI:10.1093/humrep/dey232 .
[4]	ERSOY G S, ZOLBIN M M, COSAR E, et al. CXCL12 promotes stem cell recruitment and uterine repair after injury in Asherman's syndrome[J]. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev, 2017, 4:169-177. DOI:10.1016/j.omtm.2017.01.001 .
[5]	REIN D T, SCHMIDT T, HESS A P, et al. Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue is superior to ultrasound-guided curettage[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2011, 18(6):774-778. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.003 .
[6]	CAI Y L, WU F Y, YU Y R, et al. Porous scaffolds from droplet microfluidics for prevention of intrauterine adhesion[J]. Acta Biomater, 2019, 84:222-230. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.016 .
[7]	KOU L F, JIANG X, XIAO S Y, et al. Therapeutic options and drug delivery strategies for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions[J]. J Control Release, 2020, 318:25-37. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.007 .
[8]	黄少凤, 林忠, 朱雪红, 等. 宫腔粘连大鼠模型研究进展[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2022, 42(6):560-565. DOI:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2022.025 .
	HUANG S F, LIN Z, ZHU X H, et al. Research progress in rat models of intrauterine adhesion[J]. Lab Anim Comp Med, 2022, 42(6):560-565. DOI:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2022.025 .
[9]	梁姗姗, 植枝福, 黄滟岚. 宫腔粘连动物模型建立的研究进展[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2022(8):874-877. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20210320-00137 .
	LIANG S S, ZHI Z F, HUANG Y L. Research progress on the establishment of animal model of intrauterine adhesion[J]. Chin J Reprod Contracept, 2022(8):874-877. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20210320-00137 .
[10]	CAO Y M, QI J, WANG J, et al. Injectable "homing-like" bioactive short-fibers for endometrial repair and efficient live births[J]. Adv Sci, 2024, 11(20): e2306507. DOI:10.1002/advs.202306507 .
[11]	QI J, LI X X, CAO Y M, et al. Locationally activated PRP via an injectable dual-network hydrogel for endometrial regeneration[J]. Biomaterials, 2024, 309:122615. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122615 .
[12]	HUA Q, ZHANG Y, LI H J, et al. Human umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs trans-differentiate into endometrial cells and regulate Th17/Treg balance through NF-κB signaling in rabbit intrauterine adhesions endometrium[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2022, 13(1):301. DOI:10.1186/s13287-022-02990-1 .
[13]	LIANG Y X, SHUAI Q Z, ZHANG X, et al. Incorporation of decidual stromal cells derived exosomes in sodium alginate hydrogel as an innovative therapeutic strategy for advancing endometrial regeneration and reinstating fertility[J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2024, 13(13): e2303674. DOI:10.1002/adhm. 202303674 .
[14]	ZHANG S H, SUN Y L, JIANG D L, et al. Construction and optimization of an endometrial injury model in mice by transcervical ethanol perfusion[J]. Reprod Sci, 2021, 28(3):693-702. DOI:10.1007/s43032-020-00296-2 .
[15]	LIANG S S, HUANG Y L, XIA Y F, et al. Animal models in intrauterine adhesion research[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2022, 42(8):3409-3415. DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2124854 .
[16]	LI B N, ZHANG Q W, SUN J Y, et al. Human amniotic epithelial cells improve fertility in an intrauterine adhesion mouse model[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2019, 10(1):257. DOI:10.1186/s13287-019-1368-9 .
[17]	PARK M, HONG S H, PARK S H, et al. Perivascular stem cell-derived cyclophilin A improves uterine environment with Asherman's syndrome via HIF1α-dependent angiogenesis[J]. Mol Ther, 2020, 28(8):1818-1832. DOI:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020. 05.015 .
[18]	陈醒, 毛乐乐, 刁翯, 等. 大鼠子宫腔粘连模型的构建与改进[J]. 解剖学报, 2019, 50(1):123-127. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2019.01.021 .
	CHEN X, MAO L L, DIAO H, et al. A rat model of intrauterine adhesion established by endometrial scraping[J]. Acta Anat Sin, 2019, 50(1):123-127. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2019.01.021 .
[19]	LEE W L, LIU C H, CHENG M, et al. Focus on the primary prevention of intrauterine adhesions: current concept and vision[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(10):5175. DOI:10.3390/ijms22105175 .
[20]	DAI Y Y, XIN L B, HU S T, et al. A construct of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells-laden collagen scaffold for fertility restoration by inhibiting fibrosis in a rat model of endometrial injury[J]. Regen Biomater, 2023, 10: rbad080. DOI:10.1093/rb/rbad080 .
[21]	TANG P M, NIKOLIC-PATERSON D J, LAN H Y. Macrophages: versatile players in renal inflammation and fibrosis[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2019, 15(3):144-158. DOI:10.1038/s41581-019-0110-2 .
[22]	LIU F, ZHU Z J, LI P, et al. Creation of a female rabbit model for intrauterine adhesions using mechanical and infectious injury[J]. J Surg Res, 2013, 183(1):296-303. DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.009 .
[23]	XU X X, ZHANG S S, LIN H L, et al. Metformin promotes regeneration of the injured endometrium via inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis[J]. Reprod Sci, 2019, 26(4):560-568. DOI:10.1177/1933719118804424 .
[24]	WEN J M, HOU B, LIN W G, et al. 3D-printed hydrogel scaffold-loaded granulocyte colony-stimulating factor sustained-release microspheres and their effect on endometrial regeneration[J]. Biomater Sci, 2022, 10(12):3346-3358. DOI:10.1039/d2bm00109h .
[25]	JANG H Y, MYOUNG S M, CHOE J M, et al. Effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma on regeneration of damaged endometrium in female rats[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2017, 58(6):1195-1203. DOI:10.3349/ymj.2017.58.6.1195 .