Anesthetic Effects of Different Doses of Zoletil Combined with Serazine Hydrochloride on C57BL/6J Mice

doi:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2021.064

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To observe the duration of anesthesia in C57BL/6J mice anesthetized using different doses of Zoletil combined with serazine hydrochloride to provide an effective reference for all types of mouse surgery and related experimental design. Methods One hundred C57BL/6J mice (half male and female) were randomly divided into five groups, with 20 mice (half male and female) in each group. The mice in the four groups were intraperitoneally injected with 55 mg/kg Zoletil and 13.75 mg/kg serazine hydrochloride, 65 mg/kg Zoletil and 16.25 mg/kg serazine hydrochloride, 75 mg/kg Zoletil and 18.75 mg/kg serazine hydrochloride, or 85 mg/kg Zoletil and 21.25 mg/kg serazine hydrochloride, respectively. After the righting reflex stopped, one drop (about 20 μL) was injected into each eye, and the mice were placed on a heat preservation pad. Mice in the control group were intraperitoneally injected with 200 μL normal saline. Differences in the anesthesia induction time, maintenance time, and awakening time were observed and compared. The mice were fed for one day after anesthesia; serum was collected, and liver and kidney function indexes such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatinine (CREA) were determined using Hitachi 7080 automatic biochemical analyzer. Results The success rate of anesthesia in C57BL/6J mice treated with Zoletil combined with serazine hydrochloride was 100%. When the anesthetic dose was 55-75 mg/kg, the anesthesia was induced quickly and safely, and the anesthetic effect was good. The duration of anesthesia was proportional to the injection dose of Zoletil (r² = 0.827 in male mice, r² =0.841 in female mice, both P < 0.01), and the induction time was inversely proportional to the injection dose (r² =0.432 in male mice, r²=0.410 in female mice, both P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in liver and kidney function between the groups and the control group (P＞0.05). Conclusion Anesthetizing C57BL/6J mice with Zoletil combined with serazine hydrochloride is a reliable and stable method, and the duration of anesthesia can be controlled by adjusting the dosage.

Key words: Zoletil, Serazine hydrochloride, Anesthesia, Mice

CLC Number:

Q95-33

Chengji WANG, Qing CHAI, Hui GONG, Jue WANG, Yinghan WAN, Zhengye GU, Xu BAO, Ruling SHEN. Anesthetic Effects of Different Doses of Zoletil Combined with Serazine Hydrochloride on C57BL/6J Mice[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2022, 42(1): 31-35.

Figures/Tables 2

References 18

1	徐春忠, 段俊堂, 姜传坤, 等. 舒泰对大食蚁兽麻醉效果的初步观察[J]. 野生动物, 2013, 34(1):14-15, 56. DOI:10.19711/j.cnki.issn2310-1490.2013.01.005 .
2	孙景元,黄海军,刘建勋. 舒泰对红猩猩麻醉效果的初步观察[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2016, 48(6):157-158. DOI:CNKI:SUN:SYTX.0.2017-06-009
3	李林, 卢德章, 王华, 等. 舒泰复合赛拉嗪和强痛灵麻醉猫的效果观察[J]. 中国兽医杂志, 2011, 47(1):64-66. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0529-6005.2011.01.029 .
4	陈维刚, 牛李丽, 邓家波, 等. 舒泰麻醉剂对豚鹿的麻醉效果观察[J]. 动物医学进展, 2014, 35(2):127-129. DOI:10.16437/j.cnki.1007-5038.2014.02.026 .
5	余子浩. 食蟹猴静脉复合麻醉探究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2017.
6	何洪荣,许天赐. 舒泰麻醉老虎之不良反应二例[J]. 野生动物, 2011, 32(1):34-35. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0127.2011.01.011 .
7	陈新生, 冯永其, 朱洪军. M99、舒泰和陆眠灵对野猪麻醉效果的初步观察[J]. 上海畜牧兽医通讯, 2017(6):27-28, 31. DOI:10.14170/j.cnki.cn31-1278/s.2017.06.009 .
8	邹芦, 戴天娥, 卢晓, 等. 替来他明/唑拉西泮联合右美托咪定对BALB/c小鼠麻醉效果观察[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2019, 39(4):310-313. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5817.2019.04.010 .
9	应志豪, 王才益, 黄淑芳, 等. 盐酸赛拉嗪和盐酸氯丙嗪复合麻醉在野生动物中的应用[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2016, 12(8):39-41. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4556.2016.08.027 .
10	蔺东启, 卢德章, 姜胜, 等. 舒泰复合赛拉嗪和强痛灵麻醉猫手术验证试验[J]. 中国兽医杂志, 2012, 48(6):74-75. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0529-6005.2012.06.028 .
11	李林, 卢德章, 王华, 等. 舒泰复合赛拉嗪和强痛灵麻醉猫的效果观察[J]. 中国兽医杂志, 2011, 47(1):64-66. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0529-6005.2011.01.029 .
12	刘焕奇, 侯振中, 王洪斌. 动物复合麻醉的研究进展[J]. 中国兽医学报, 2003, 23(3):309-312. DOI:10.16303/j.cnki.1005-4545. 2003.03.042 .
13	王丰好, 王伟涛. 小动物复合麻醉的研究进展[J]. 中国动物检疫, 2010, 27(8):69-71. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-944X.2010.08.037 .
14	ZELLER W, MEIER G, BÜRKI K, et al. Adverse effects of tribromoethanol as used in the production of transgenic mice[J]. Lab Anim, 1998, 32(4):407-413. DOI:10.1258/002367798780599811 .
15	严国锋, 张健, 周勇, 等. 保温措施对小鼠麻醉效果的影响[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2008, 28(5):341-342. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1674-5817.2008.05.015 .
16	BELANT J L. Field immobilization of raccoons (Procyon lotor) with telazol and xylazine[J]. J Wildl Dis, 2004, 40(4):787-790. DOI:10.7589/0090-3558-40.4.787 .
17	郭优勤, 郭锐, 魏桂林, 等. 浅谈舒泰麻醉药在动物临床麻醉中的应用[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2012, 6(1):77-78. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-9523.2012.01.063 .
18	段俊堂, 徐春忠, 吴昆, 等. 不同剂量的舒泰对猕猴麻醉效果的观察[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2012(s2):147-151. DOI:CNKI:SUN:XMYS. 0.2012-S2-078 .

项目	性别	各剂量舒泰联合盐酸赛拉嗪
项目	性别	55 mg/kg	65 mg/kg	75 mg/kg	85 mg/kg
麻醉诱导时间	♂	14.32±6.16	11.55±3.30	9.41±1.99^*	5.75±1.86^**
麻醉诱导时间	♀	14.26±2.85	12.6±2.29	11.07±2.82^*	8.33±2.86^*
麻醉维持时间	♂	12.03±3.19	31.76±3.78^**△△	39.75±4.34^**△△	45.35±5.64^**
麻醉维持时间	♀	11.11±3.56	23.99±5.13^{**▲▲△△}	39.67±8.28^**△△	46.67±5.68^**△△
麻醉恢复时间	♂	19.26±8.64	22.14±5.86	39.11±7.88^**	45.95±27.00^**a
麻醉恢复时间	♀	23.02±4.77	28.62±5.68^**	35.15±11.12^**	46.27±20.24^**b
总麻醉时间	♂	40.25±14.58	63.11±6.55^**	86.83±8.93^**	91.33±37.74^**a
总麻醉时间	♀	46.89±6.93	63.59±7.99^**	84.46±11.31^**	103.84±16.41^**b

项目	性别	各剂量舒泰联合盐酸赛拉嗪
项目	性别	55 mg/kg	65 mg/kg	75 mg/kg	85 mg/kg
麻醉诱导时间	♂	14.32±6.16	11.55±3.30	9.41±1.99^*	5.75±1.86^**
麻醉诱导时间	♀	14.26±2.85	12.6±2.29	11.07±2.82^*	8.33±2.86^*
麻醉维持时间	♂	12.03±3.19	31.76±3.78^**△△	39.75±4.34^**△△	45.35±5.64^**
麻醉维持时间	♀	11.11±3.56	23.99±5.13^{**▲▲△△}	39.67±8.28^**△△	46.67±5.68^**△△
麻醉恢复时间	♂	19.26±8.64	22.14±5.86	39.11±7.88^**	45.95±27.00^**a
麻醉恢复时间	♀	23.02±4.77	28.62±5.68^**	35.15±11.12^**	46.27±20.24^**b
总麻醉时间	♂	40.25±14.58	63.11±6.55^**	86.83±8.93^**	91.33±37.74^**a
总麻醉时间	♀	46.89±6.93	63.59±7.99^**	84.46±11.31^**	103.84±16.41^**b

检测项目	性别	对照组	各剂量舒泰联合盐酸赛拉嗪
检测项目	性别	对照组	55 mg/kg	65 mg/kg	75 mg/kg	85 mg/kg
谷丙转氨酶 z/(U·L^-1)	♂	20.93±3.75	19.78±1.53	20.95±1.95	20.80±2.16	20.04±2.05
谷丙转氨酶 z/(U·L^-1)	♀	19.74±1.50	20.26±1.46	21.34±1.43	20.44±1.63	20.64±1.76
谷草转氨酶 z/(U·L^-1)	♂	79.25±12.77	80.00±6.23	86.59±3.76	80.15±7.28	80.65±6.49
谷草转氨酶 z/(U·L^-1)	♀	83.61±10.31	80.69±5.93	78.70±8.06	82.36±6.24	79.04±4.65
肌酐 c/(µmol·L^-1)	♂	9.83±0.93	10.16±0.55	10.18±0.74	10.13±0.74	10.49±0.62
肌酐 c/(µmol·L^-1)	♀	9.62±1.17	9.55±1.05	9.88±0.70	9.68±0.49	10.17±0.64

检测项目	性别	对照组	各剂量舒泰联合盐酸赛拉嗪
检测项目	性别	对照组	55 mg/kg	65 mg/kg	75 mg/kg	85 mg/kg
谷丙转氨酶 z/(U·L^-1)	♂	20.93±3.75	19.78±1.53	20.95±1.95	20.80±2.16	20.04±2.05
谷丙转氨酶 z/(U·L^-1)	♀	19.74±1.50	20.26±1.46	21.34±1.43	20.44±1.63	20.64±1.76
谷草转氨酶 z/(U·L^-1)	♂	79.25±12.77	80.00±6.23	86.59±3.76	80.15±7.28	80.65±6.49
谷草转氨酶 z/(U·L^-1)	♀	83.61±10.31	80.69±5.93	78.70±8.06	82.36±6.24	79.04±4.65
肌酐 c/(µmol·L^-1)	♂	9.83±0.93	10.16±0.55	10.18±0.74	10.13±0.74	10.49±0.62
肌酐 c/(µmol·L^-1)	♀	9.62±1.17	9.55±1.05	9.88±0.70	9.68±0.49	10.17±0.64

[1]	Xin LIU, Shaobo SHI, Cui ZHANG, Bo YANG, Chuan QU. Construction and Evaluation of End-to-side Anastomosis Model of Autologous Arteriovenous Fistula in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(6): 595-603.
[2]	Dan WANG, Xiaolu ZHANG, Yan WANG, Bo FU, Wendong WANG, Jing LIU, Suyin ZHANG, Yihe WU, Deguo WU, Xiaoyan DU, Dawei ZHAN, Xiulin ZHANG, Changlong LI. Study on the Antibody Production Efficiency in Modified Big-BALB/c Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(6): 612-618.
[3]	Lingzhi YU, Jianyun XIE, Liping FENG, Xiaofeng WEI. Establishment of Fluorescence qPCR Method for Detection of Staphylococcus Aureus and Its Application in Feces Detection of Rats and Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 566-573.
[4]	Chengji WANG, Jue WANG, Haijie WANG, Weisheng LU, Yan SHI, Zhengye GU, Mingqiu WAN, Ruling SHEN. Application of Optimized Latex Perfusion Technique in the Establishment of Craniofacial Venous Model in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 574-578.
[5]	Xiaoqian TAN, Hao YANG, Huiqing TANG, Wei QU, Liang LI, Zhen QIAN, Jianzhong GU, Ping XU, Junhua XIAO. Creation and Analysis of Related Genetic Characteristics of BALB/cA.Cg.SHJH ^hr Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(4): 363-370.
[6]	Yasheng DENG, Jiang LIN, Chiling GAN, Guanfeng ZENG, Jiayin HUANG, Huifang DENG, Yingxian MA, Siyin HAN. Literature Analysis of the Preparation Elements of Animal Models of Skin Photoaging and the Data of Subjects [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(4): 406-414.
[7]	Shanshan ZHAI, Liang LIANG, Yingying CAO, Zhuxin LI, Qing WANG, Junyu TAO, Chenxia YUN, Jing LENG, Haibo TANG. Diagnosis of Trichoepithelioma in a Tree Shrew and Observation of Cell Biological Characteristics [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(4): 440-445.
[8]	Zhiqiang PAN, Zixin NONG, Haina XIE, Peike PENG. Injurious Effect of Cisplatin on the Function of Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal/gonadal Axis in Mice and the Intervention Effect of Dehydroepiandrosterone [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(3): 229-242.
[9]	Wenwen GUO, Ya ZHAO, Yinghua WANG, Ke LIU, Xu GE, Yanying ZHANG, Yongfeng WANG, Changhong SHI. Repairing Effects of Ginsenoside Rg1 on Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(3): 243-252.
[10]	Yuan ZHANG, Han LI, Chengfang ZHANG. Whole-brain Transcriptomic Analysis of Weight Gain Mice induced by Olanzapine [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(3): 262-270.
[11]	Zhigang TAN, Jinxin LIU, Chuya ZHENG, Wenfeng LIAO, Luping FENG, Hongli PENG, Xiu YAN, Zhenjian ZHUO. Advances and Applications in Animal Models of Neuroblastoma [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(3): 288-296.
[12]	Susu LIU, Yong WU, Yuan CAO, Haoyang ZHAO, Shijie ZHAI, Xiaowei SUN, Linli LI, Changfa FAN. Establishment of hKDR^+/+ Humanized and Rag1^-/- Gene Knockout Double Genetically Modified Mouse Model [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(2): 103-111.
[13]	Jingwei MA, Gen LI, Yang YANG, Caixia ZANG, Xiuqi BAO, Dan ZHANG. Comparative Study on Different Recovery Periods of the Spermatogenic Dysfunction Mouse Model Induced by Cyclophosphamide [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(2): 112-123.
[14]	Huiqing TANG, Shufu CHANG, Zhifeng YU, Lei ZHANG, Xiaoqian TAN, Wei QU, Liang LI, Zhen QIAN, Jianzhong GU, Ping XU. Investigation on Biological Characteristics and Aging Phenotype of SHJH ^hr Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(1): 44-52.
[15]	Han LI, Xiaorui ZHANG, Chengfang ZHANG. Mechanism of Intermittent Fasting in Improving Olanzapine-induced Metabolic Disorders in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(1): 3-10.