›› 2010, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 406-409.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

愤怒郁怒诱发经前期综合征病证结合猕猴模型的建立及行为学评价

  

  1. 山东中医药大学中医药经典理论教育部重点实验室,济南 250355
  • 收稿日期:2010-05-31 出版日期:2010-06-30 发布日期:2010-06-30
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)资助课题(从肝论治抑郁症、经前期综合征探讨肝主疏泄调畅情志的作用机制,2011CB505102);国家自然科学基金重点项目(肝疏泄失常与调肝方药对不同脑区功能的影响及其机制研究,30930110);国家自然科学基金面上项目(诱发愤怒、郁怒大鼠模型脑中枢关键指标筛选及其评价,30973688)

Establishing and E thology Evaluation of Anger-out and Anger-in Inducing Premenstrusl Syndrome Macaque Model

  1. Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Classics Theory, Jinan 250355, China
  • Received:2010-05-31 Online:2010-06-30 Published:2010-06-30

摘要: 目的 制备愤怒郁怒诱发经前期综合征病证结合猕猴模型,为愤怒郁怒诱发情志病证脑中枢机理探索提供合适的对象.方法 以雌性实验猕猴为对象,经由社会压力应激法诱导猕猴出现怒情绪,然后应用前期研制的《雌性实验猕猴情绪评价量表》对猕猴不同情绪类型进行量化打分,依据打分结果鉴别分化出愤怒、郁怒情绪亚型,分别以愤怒、郁怒猕猴为对象应用择时挤压造模法制备经前期综合征病证结合猕猴模型.结果 造模刺激后,PMS肝气逆证模型组猕猴愤怒因子积分较正常对照组显著增加(P<0.01),而给药后猕猴愤怒因子积分较正常对照组无显著差异(<i>P</i>>0.05).PMS肝气郁证模型组猕猴抑郁因子积分较正常对照组显著增加(P<0.01),而给药后猕猴抑郁因子积分较正常对照组无显著差异(<i>P</i>>0.05).结论 依据30 min成组随意观测及量表积分结果可见应用社会压力应激配合择时挤压造模法能较好诱导出实验猕猴愤怒郁怒情绪反应并进而形成经前期综合征病证表现,主观观测及客观评分结果可作为评价实验猕猴病证表现的较好测量方法.

关键词: 愤怒, 郁怒, 经前期综合征, 猕猴模型, 情绪评价量表

Abstract: Objective Establishing anger-out and anger-in inducing emotional diseases macaque model to provide suitable research object for brain center mechanism of anger-out and anger-in inducing emotional diseases. Methods Using female macaque and inducing anger emotion occurence, then applying “Emotional evaluation scale of female experiment macaque”to score different emotion type of macaque model. We will differentiate anger-out and anger-in types from all anger monkeys based on scale scores and finish evaluating different anger types. Using anger-out and anger-in monkeys individu-ally add to pressurization method to prepare anger-in or anger-out inducing emotional diseases monkey model. Results After modeling stress,anger factors of PMS liver-qi invasion model monkeys increased significantly than control team(P<0.05), while PMS liver-qi depression model monkeys had a notable change compared with control team(P<0.05). While there is no difference compared with control team (P>0.05) after administration. Conclusion It could be inferred that target disease could be induced successfully using social surbodination stress according to results of 30-minute group ad libitum obser-vation and scale scores, subjective combined objective results were regarded as a good measure methods to evaluate target emotional disease occurence on macaque. Idea and method mentioned above provide a suitable research object for occurrence pathogenesy of anger-out and anger-in emotion inducing emotional disorder.

Key words: Anger-out, Anger-in, Premenstrual Syndrome, Macaque model, Emotional evaluation scale