›› 2008, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 23-26.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

活化血小板流式细胞术不同检测方法比较

  

  1. 1.北京协和医院研究生院,北京 100029;2.卫生部中日友好医院心内科,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2007-08-20 出版日期:2008-01-31 发布日期:2008-01-31

The Comparison of Different Methods on Flow Cytometric Analysis of Activated Platelet

  1. 1.Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College;2. Dept, of Cardiology,China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2007-08-20 Online:2008-01-31 Published:2008-01-31

摘要: 目的 比较不同的处理方法对活化血小板流式细胞术检测结果的影响.方法 随机抽取Wistar 大鼠 8 只,腹主动脉抽血,分别用常规全血法、内固定全血法、外固定全血法、富血小板血浆先固定法、富血小板血浆后固定法 5 种方法处理后,应用流式细胞术检测血小板表面 CD62 的表达.采用 SPSS 11.5 统计软件分析结果.结果 不同处理方法测定的 CD62 表达程度不同,内固定全血法<外固定全血法<常规全血法<PRP 先固定法<PRP 后固定法,各组之间差别显著.结论 内固定全血法能够迅速固定血小板,避免血小板的体外活化,更能够反映体内血小板活化的实际情况.

关键词: 活化血小板, 流式细胞术, 检测方法

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of different methods on flow cytometric analysis of activated platelet. Methods Eight Wistar rats were randomly chosed and blood preparation drawed from abdominal aorta. Each specimen was dealed with conventional whole blood method, internal fixative whole blood method, external fixative whole blood method,platelet rich plasma (PRP) first fixative method, and PRP lastly fixative method respectively. Flow cytometric analysis was applied to detect the expression of CD62 on the surface of platelet.The database was established by Excel software and analyzed by SPSS 11.5 software. Results The expression of CD62 on the surface of platelet of different method were not coherent. The increase progressively sequence was internal fixative whole blood method, external fixative whole blood method, conventional whole blood method, PRP first fixative method and PRP lastly fixative method. There was obviously distinction between every methods. Conclusion Internal fixative whole blood method fixed platelet promptly and avoided platelet activation out-of-body, so it could reflect actual activated degree of platelet.

Key words: Activated platelet, Flow cytometric analysis, Detect methods