Comparison of Methods between Soiled Bedding Sentinels and Exhaust Air Dust PCR for Health Monitoring of Rodent Laboratory Animals

doi:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2023.168

Abstract

Abstract:

The microbiological quality of laboratory animals is crucial for the validity and reproducibility of scientific research data, as well as human health and animal welfare. Currently, individual ventilation cages (IVC) have become the mainstream feeding system for rodent laboratory animals. The most commonly used pathogen monitoring method for this feeding system is soiled bedding sentinels (SBS). This method monitors the microbial carrying status of mouse colony through indirect contact and delayed feedback. It can effectively monitor pathogens transmitted via the fecal-oral route, such as mouse hepatitis virus and reovirus. However, this method has difficulty detecting pathogens mainly transmitted through aerosols or direct contact, such as Sendai virus and Pasteurella pneumotropica. The exhaust air dust (EAD)-PCR monitoring method involves swab sampling in the IVC exhaust ducts to monitor the corresponding racks of the ducts; swab sampling before the prefiltration of the host to monitor the entire IVC rack; and EAD collection device sampling to monitor all racks connected to the same host. Different IVC manufacturers have developed corresponding EAD collection devices for their respective IVC systems, making operations convenient and standardization easy. Compared with the SBS method, the EAD-PCR method significantly improves detection rate and timeliness, with the fastest detection possible after one week of exposure. It can serve as a supplement or replacement for the SBS method. Currently, increasing evidence supports that EAD-PCR testing is a more reliable, sensitive, and cost-effective monitoring method, and is more beneficial to animal welfare. This article reviews the application progress of these two methods for monitoring pathogens, analyzes the existing limitations of the EAD-PCR method, and proposes solutions based on its implementation in our laboratory and examination units. The EAD-PCR method helps reduce the number of live sentinel animals used in pathogen monitoring, in order to better maintain the "3Rs" principle of laboratory animal welfare.

Key words: Rodent laboratory animals, Health monitoring, Soiled bedding sentinels, Exhaust air dust- PCR monitoring

CLC Number:

Q95-33

Lingzhi YU,Xiaofeng WEI,Ming LI,et al. Comparison of Methods between Soiled Bedding Sentinels and Exhaust Air Dust PCR for Health Monitoring of Rodent Laboratory Animals[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(3): 321-327. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2023.168.

References 36

1	BRIELMEIER M, MAHABIR E, NEEDHAM J R, et al. Microbiological monitoring of laboratory mice and biocontainment in individually ventilated cages: a field study[J]. Lab Anim, 2006, 40(3):247-260. DOI: 10.1258/002367706777611497 .
2	DILLEHAY D L, LEHNER N D, HUERKAMP M J. The effectiveness of a microisolator cage system and sentinel mice for controlling and detecting MHV and Sendai virus infections[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 1990, 40(4):367-370.
3	LIPMAN N S, HOMBERGER F R. Rodent quality assurance testing: use of sentinel animal systems[J]. Lab Anim, 2003, 32(5):36-43. DOI: 10.1038/laban0503-36 .
4	WORKING GROUP ON REVISION OF GUIDELINES FOR HEALTH MONITORING OF RODENTS AND RABBITS F E L A A A, CONVENOR M M, BERARD M, et al. FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units[J]. Lab Anim, 2014, 48(3):178-192. DOI: 10.1177/0023677213516312 .
5	MANUEL C A, PUGAZHENTHI U, LESZCZYNSKI J K. Surveillance of a ventilated rack system for Corynebacterium bovis by sampling exhaust-air manifolds[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2016, 55(1):58-65.
6	国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 实验动物微生物学、寄生虫学等级及监测: [S/OL]. (2022-12-19)[2023-11-22]. .
	General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, China National Standardization Commission. , Laboratory animals –Microbiological and parasitical standards and monitoring [S/OL]. (2022-12-19) [2023-11-22 ]. .
7	MILLER M, BRIELMEIER M. Environmental samples make soiled bedding sentinels dispensable for hygienic monitoring of IVC-reared mouse colonies[J]. Lab Anim, 2018, 52(3):233-239. DOI: 10.1177/0023677217739329 .
8	DE BRUIN W C C, VAN DE VEN E M E, HOOIJMANS C R. Efficacy of soiled bedding transfer for transmission of mouse and rat infections to sentinels: a systematic review[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(8): e0158410. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158410 .
9	BAUER B A, BESCH-WILLIFORD C, LIVINGSTON R S, et al. Influence of rack design and disease prevalence on detection of rodent pathogens in exhaust debris samples from individually ventilated caging systems[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2016, 55(6):782-788.
10	MAILHIOT D, OSTDIEK A M, LUCHINS K R, et al. Comparing mouse health monitoring between soiled-bedding sentinel and exhaust air dust surveillance programs[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2020, 59(1):58-66. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000061 .
11	COMPTON S R, HOMBERGER F R, PATURZO F X, et al. Efficacy of three microbiological monitoring methods in a ventilated cage rack[J]. Comp Med, 2004, 54(4):382-392.
12	GROVE K A, SMITH P C, BOOTH C J, et al. Age-associated variability in susceptibility of Swiss Webster mice to MPV and other excluded murine pathogens[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2012, 51(6):789-796.
13	ARTWOHL J E, CERA L M, WRIGHT M F, et al. The efficacy of a dirty bedding sentinel system for detecting Sendai virus infection in mice: a comparison of clinical signs and seroconversion[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 1994, 44(1):73-75.
14	WINN C B, ROGERS R N, KEENAN R A, et al. Using filter media and soiled bedding in disposable individually ventilated cages as a refinement to specific pathogen-free mouse health monitoring programs[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2022, 61(4):361-369. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000013 .
15	SCHARMANN W, HELLER A. Survival and transmissibility of Pasteurella pneumotropica[J]. Lab Anim, 2001, 35(2):163-166. DOI: 10.1258/0023677011911543 .
16	MILLER M, RITTER B, ZORN J, et al. Exhaust air dust monitoring is superior to soiled bedding sentinels for the detection of Pasteurella pneumotropica in individually ventilated cage systems[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2016, 55(6):775-781.
17	MAHABIR E, DURAND S, HENDERSON K S, et al. Comparison of two prevalent individually ventilated caging systems for detection of murine infectious agents via exhaust air particles[J]. Lab Anim, 2019, 53(1):84-88. DOI: 10.1177/0023677218785929 .
18	CUNDIFF D D, RILEY L K, FRANKLIN C L, et al. Failure of a soiled bedding sentinel system to detect cilia-associated respiratory bacillus infection in rats[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 1995, 45(2):219-221.
19	LINDSTROM K E, CARBONE L G, KELLAR D E, et al. Soiled bedding sentinels for the detection of fur mites in mice[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2011, 50(1):54-60.
20	BUCHHEISTER S, BLEICH A. Health monitoring of laboratory rodent colonies-talking about (r)evolution[J]. Animals, 2021, 11(5):1410. DOI: 10.3390/ani11051410 .
21	LUCHINS K R, MAILHIOT D, THERIAULT B R, et al. Detection of lactate dehydrogenase elevating virus in a mouse vivarium using an exhaust air dust health monitoring program[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2020, 59(3):328-333. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000107 .
22	IKE F, BOURGADE F, OHSAWA K, et al. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis infection undetected by dirty-bedding sentinel monitoring and revealed after embryo transfer of an inbred strain derived from wild mice[J]. Comp Med, 2007, 57(3):272-281.
23	BESSELSEN D G, BECKER M D, HENDERSON K S, et al. Temporal transmission studies of mouse parvovirus 1 in BALB/c and C.B-17/Icr-Prkdc(scid) mice[J]. Comp Med, 2007, 57(1):66-73.
24	PETTAN-BREWER C, TROST R J, MAGGIO-PRICE L, et al. Adoption of exhaust air dust testing in SPF rodent facilities[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2020, 59(2):156-162. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000079 .
25	LIVINGSTON R S, RILEY L K. Diagnostic testing of mouse and rat colonies for infectious agents[J]. Lab Anim, 2003, 32(5):44-51. DOI: 10.1038/laban0503-44 .
26	KÖRNER C, MILLER M, BRIELMEIER M. Detection of Murine Astrovirus and Myocoptes musculinus in individually ventilated caging systems: investigations to expose suitable detection methods for routine hygienic monitoring[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(8): e0221118. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221118 .
27	JENSEN E S, ALLEN K P, HENDERSON K S, et al. PCR testing of a ventilated caging system to detect murine fur mites[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2013, 52(1):28-33.
28	MANUEL C A, PUGAZHENTHI U, SPIEGEL S P, et al. Detection and elimination of Corynebacterium bovis from barrier rooms by using an environmental sampling surveillance program[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2017, 56(2):202-209.
29	KAPOOR P, HAYES Y O, JARRELL L T, et al. Evaluation of anthelmintic resistance and exhaust air dust PCR as a diagnostic tool in mice enzootically infected with Aspiculuris tetraptera [J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2017, 56(3):273-289.
30	ZORN J, RITTER B, MILLER M, et al. Murine norovirus detection in the exhaust air of IVCs is more sensitive than serological analysis of soiled bedding sentinels[J]. Lab Anim, 2017, 51(3):301-310. DOI: 10.1177/0023677216661586 .
31	LEWIS D I. Animal experimentation: implementation and application of the 3Rs[J]. Emerg Top Life Sci, 2019, 3(6):675-679. DOI: 10.1042/ETLS20190061 .
32	LUCHINS K R, BOWERS C J, MAILHIOT D, et al. Cost comparison of rodent soiled bedding sentinel and exhaust air dust health-monitoring programs[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2020, 59(5):508-511. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000003 .
33	LEBLANC M, BERRY K, GRACIANO S, et al. False-positive results after environmental pinworm PCR testing due to Rhabditid nematodes in Corncob bedding[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2014, 53(6):717-724.
34	COMPTON S R, BOOTH C J, MACY J D. Murine astrovirus infection and transmission in neonatal CD1 mice[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2017, 56(4):402-411.
35	BURR H N, WOLF F R, LIPMAN N S. Corynebacterium bovis: epizootiologic features and environmental contamination in an enzootically infected rodent room[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2012, 51(2):189-198.
36	AURORE D D, JUAN C C, CHERYL L P, et al. Comparison of individual ventilated cage rack cleaning methods: tools for exhaust air dust testing[C/OL]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2016, 55:632. (2016-11-03)[2023-11-22]. .

[1]	FEI Bin, GUO Wenke, GUO Jianping. Research Progress on Animal Models for Hernia Diseases and New Hernia Repair Materials [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 55-66.
[2]	LI Tengfei, ZHENG Qingyong, XU Jianguo, LI Yiyi, ZHOU Yongjia, XU Caihua, ZHANG Mingyue, TIAN Jiexiang, WANG Gang, TIAN Jinhui. Improving the Certainty of Evidence in Animal Experiment Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis: An Empirical Study of the GRADE Method [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 101-111.
[3]	HOU Dongxia, TIE Zuoxiu, LU Yong, NAN Panpan, BAO Jie. Exploration and Practice of Safe Access System Construction for Barrier Environment Facilities of Laboratory Animals: A Case Study on Xianlin Campus of Nanjing University [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 96-100.
[4]	HE Yuxin, BAI Zhenzhong, XUE Hua, GUO Zixu, CAO Xuefeng. Analysis of Kidney Differential Metabolites and Hypoxia Adaptation Mechanism of Plateau Pikas Based on UHPLC-QE-MS [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 3-12.
[5]	TANG Yingen, FENG Yaxian, ZHONG Min, WEI Zhen, WANG Lie, LIU Diwen. Polymorphism and Tissue Expression Analysis of TYR and MC1R Genes in Guinea Pigs with Different Coat-Color Phenotypes [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 21-29.
[6]	. [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 112-116.
[7]	WEI Yanye, SHEN Guo, ZHANG Pengfei, SHI Songping, HU Jiahao, ZHANG Xuzhe, HUA Huiyuan, HUA Guanyang, LU Hongzheng, ZENG Yong, JI Feng, WEI Zhumei. Dynamic Monitoring and Correlation Analysis of General Body Indicators, Blood Glucose, and Blood Lipid in Obese Cynomolgus Monkeys [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 30-36.
[8]	XU Shengye, HUANG Junfeng, CHEN Yihang, CHANG Liangtang. Design of a Capture Stress-Free Marmoset Monkey Chair Device for Experiments and Its Preliminary Application [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 67-72.
[9]	ZHANG Nan, LI Huaiyin, LIAN Xiaodi, WEI Juanpeng, GAO Ming. Effects of Different Durations of Light Exposure on Body Weight and Learning and Memory Abilities of NIH Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 73-78.
[10]	WANG Qianqian, TAO Sijue, WEI Zhen, JIN Huihui, LIU Ping, WANG Lie. A Case Study of Using Assisted Reproductive Technology to Rescue Genetically Modified Mice with Reproductive Disorder Phenotypes [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 79-86.
[11]	LIU Wei, ZHANG Xinyan, HOU Fengtian, XU Zhongkan, MA Liying. Evaluation of Proficiency Validation Results for Air Change Rate Testing in Laboratory Animal Facilities [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 87-95.
[12]	JIAO Qingzhen, WU Guihua, TANG Wen, FAN Fan, FENG Kai, YANG Chunxiang, Qiao Jian, DENG Sufang. Dynamic monitoring and analysis of ammonia concentration in laboratory animal facilities under suspension of HVAC system air supply [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, (): 1-6.
[13]	TAO Lingyun. Genetic Characteristics and Research Progress of Feline Coronavirus [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(6): 661-666.
[14]	ZHAO Lijuan, XIAO Chunlan, SHENG Yajie, LU Xi, ZHOU Zhengyu. Challenges and Development in Suzhou Laboratory Animal Industry Over the Past Five Decades [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(6): 645-653.
[15]	. [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(6): 700-703.