Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 654-660.DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.057
• Quality Control of Laboratory Animals • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Lida1(), CHEN Bing2, XIE Na1, LIU Li1, ZHUANG Siqi1, ZOU Yixing2(
)(
)
Received:
2024-04-17
Revised:
2024-05-30
Online:
2024-12-25
Published:
2025-01-04
Contact:
ZOU Yixing
CLC Number:
LIU Lida,CHEN Bing,XIE Na,et al. Survey Report Analysis on Parasitic and Microbial Quality of Laboratory Animals in Sichuan Province, 2017-2023[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(6): 654-660. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.057.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.slarc.org.cn/dwyx/EN/10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.057
年份 Year | 抽检单 位/家 Number of units | 抽检动物数量/只# Number of laboratory animals# | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小鼠a Mousea | 大鼠a Rata | 豚鼠b Guinea pigb | 豚鼠c Guinea pigc | 兔b Rabbitb | 犬b Dogb | 猴b Monkeyb | 小型猪b Miniature pigb | 总数 Total | ||
2017 | 8 | 35 (7) | 25 (5) | NA | 10 (2) | NA | 15 (3) | NA | NA | 85 |
2019 | 13 | 30 (6) | 20 (4) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | 40 (4) | NA | 130 |
2020 | 9 | 25 (5) | 25 (5) | NA | NA | NA | 15 (3) | 45 (3) | NA | 110 |
2021 | 14 | 35 (7) | 20 (4) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | NA | NA | 40 (4) | 20 (4) | 135 |
2022 | 17 | 50 (10) | 40 (8) | NA | NA | NA | 10 (2) | 40 (4) | 20 (4) | 160 |
2023 | 14 | 50 (10) | 35 (7) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | 5 (1) | NA | 50 (4) | NA | 160 |
Total | 75 | 225 | 165 | 30 | 40 | 15 | 50 | 215 | 40 | 780 |
Table 1 Number of laboratory animals sampled for quality inspection in Sichuan from 2017 to 2023
年份 Year | 抽检单 位/家 Number of units | 抽检动物数量/只# Number of laboratory animals# | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小鼠a Mousea | 大鼠a Rata | 豚鼠b Guinea pigb | 豚鼠c Guinea pigc | 兔b Rabbitb | 犬b Dogb | 猴b Monkeyb | 小型猪b Miniature pigb | 总数 Total | ||
2017 | 8 | 35 (7) | 25 (5) | NA | 10 (2) | NA | 15 (3) | NA | NA | 85 |
2019 | 13 | 30 (6) | 20 (4) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | 40 (4) | NA | 130 |
2020 | 9 | 25 (5) | 25 (5) | NA | NA | NA | 15 (3) | 45 (3) | NA | 110 |
2021 | 14 | 35 (7) | 20 (4) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | NA | NA | 40 (4) | 20 (4) | 135 |
2022 | 17 | 50 (10) | 40 (8) | NA | NA | NA | 10 (2) | 40 (4) | 20 (4) | 160 |
2023 | 14 | 50 (10) | 35 (7) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | 5 (1) | NA | 50 (4) | NA | 160 |
Total | 75 | 225 | 165 | 30 | 40 | 15 | 50 | 215 | 40 | 780 |
动物 Animal | 检出病原体 Pathogens | 不同年份的检出阳性率/% Positive rate in different years/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
类别 Category | 名称 Name | 2017 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | ||
SPF级小鼠 SPF mouse | 寄生虫 | 蠕虫 | 17.1 (4a、2f) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
鞭毛虫 | 8.6 (3a) | 0 | NA | NA | 0 | 0 | |||
病原菌 | 沙门菌 | 5.7 (2d) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
金黄色葡萄球菌 | 0 | 10.0 (1b、2c) | 0 | NA | NA | NA | |||
肺炎克雷白杆菌 | 0 | 3.3 (1a) | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | |||
病毒 | 小鼠肝炎病毒抗体 | 57.1 (5a、5c、5d、5f) | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | ||
小鼠肺炎病毒抗体 | 20.0 (2a、5f) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
仙台病毒抗体 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.3 (5h) | 0 | 0 | |||
SPF级大鼠 SPF rat | 寄生虫 | 蠕虫 | 24.0 (1a、2c、3f) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
病原菌 | 支原体抗体 | 20.0 (5a) | 25.0 (5h) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
金黄色葡萄球菌 | 16.0 (2b、2f) | 35.0 (2b、5c) | 0 | NA | NA | NA | |||
嗜肺巴斯德杆菌 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 11.4 (4a) | |||
肺炎克雷白杆菌 | 0 | 5.0 (1a) | 0 | 0 | NA | 2.9 (1l) | |||
病毒 | 仙台病毒抗体 | 4.0 (1a) | 0 | 0 | 25.0 (5h) | 0 | 0 | ||
小鼠肺炎病毒抗体 | 20.0 (5a) | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | |||
大鼠细小病毒RV株抗体 | 48.0 (5a、5c、2f) | 0 | 0 | 25.0 (5a) | 13 (5a) | 0 | |||
大鼠细小病毒H-1株抗体 | 32.0 (4a、1c、3f) | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | |||
大鼠冠状病毒抗体 | 20.0 (5a) | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | NA | |||
普通级兔 Rabbit | 寄生虫 | 弓形虫抗体 | NA | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 0 | |
普通级犬 Dog | 病毒 | 狂犬病毒抗体 | 40.0 (3c、3e、0g) | 20.0 (1e、1g) | 100 | NA NA | 100 | NA NA | |
犬瘟热病毒抗体 | 73.3 (2c、5e、4g) | 70 (3e、4g) | 100 | 100 | |||||
普通级豚鼠 Guinea pig | 寄生虫 | 弓形虫抗体 | NA | 20.0 (2j) | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | |
普通级猴 Monkey | 寄生虫 | 弓形虫抗体 | NA NA | 5.0 (1e、1i) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
病毒 | 猕猴疱疹病毒I型(B病毒)抗体 | 12.5 (3e、2i) | 6.7 (3e) | 0 | 2.5 (1e) | 0 |
Table 2 Positive detection rates of pathogens in laboratory animals from 2017 to 2023
动物 Animal | 检出病原体 Pathogens | 不同年份的检出阳性率/% Positive rate in different years/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
类别 Category | 名称 Name | 2017 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | ||
SPF级小鼠 SPF mouse | 寄生虫 | 蠕虫 | 17.1 (4a、2f) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
鞭毛虫 | 8.6 (3a) | 0 | NA | NA | 0 | 0 | |||
病原菌 | 沙门菌 | 5.7 (2d) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
金黄色葡萄球菌 | 0 | 10.0 (1b、2c) | 0 | NA | NA | NA | |||
肺炎克雷白杆菌 | 0 | 3.3 (1a) | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | |||
病毒 | 小鼠肝炎病毒抗体 | 57.1 (5a、5c、5d、5f) | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | ||
小鼠肺炎病毒抗体 | 20.0 (2a、5f) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
仙台病毒抗体 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.3 (5h) | 0 | 0 | |||
SPF级大鼠 SPF rat | 寄生虫 | 蠕虫 | 24.0 (1a、2c、3f) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
病原菌 | 支原体抗体 | 20.0 (5a) | 25.0 (5h) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
金黄色葡萄球菌 | 16.0 (2b、2f) | 35.0 (2b、5c) | 0 | NA | NA | NA | |||
嗜肺巴斯德杆菌 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 11.4 (4a) | |||
肺炎克雷白杆菌 | 0 | 5.0 (1a) | 0 | 0 | NA | 2.9 (1l) | |||
病毒 | 仙台病毒抗体 | 4.0 (1a) | 0 | 0 | 25.0 (5h) | 0 | 0 | ||
小鼠肺炎病毒抗体 | 20.0 (5a) | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | |||
大鼠细小病毒RV株抗体 | 48.0 (5a、5c、2f) | 0 | 0 | 25.0 (5a) | 13 (5a) | 0 | |||
大鼠细小病毒H-1株抗体 | 32.0 (4a、1c、3f) | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | |||
大鼠冠状病毒抗体 | 20.0 (5a) | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | NA | |||
普通级兔 Rabbit | 寄生虫 | 弓形虫抗体 | NA | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 0 | |
普通级犬 Dog | 病毒 | 狂犬病毒抗体 | 40.0 (3c、3e、0g) | 20.0 (1e、1g) | 100 | NA NA | 100 | NA NA | |
犬瘟热病毒抗体 | 73.3 (2c、5e、4g) | 70 (3e、4g) | 100 | 100 | |||||
普通级豚鼠 Guinea pig | 寄生虫 | 弓形虫抗体 | NA | 20.0 (2j) | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | |
普通级猴 Monkey | 寄生虫 | 弓形虫抗体 | NA NA | 5.0 (1e、1i) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
病毒 | 猕猴疱疹病毒I型(B病毒)抗体 | 12.5 (3e、2i) | 6.7 (3e) | 0 | 2.5 (1e) | 0 |
Figure 1 Trend of qualified rates for laboratory animal sampling in Sichuan Province from 2017 to 2023Note: Rats, mice and monkeys were not sampled in 2018; Dogs were not sampled in 2018, 2021, and 2023; Guinea pigs were not sampled in 2017, 2018, 2020, and 2022.
1 | 赵心刚, 卢凡, 程苹, 等. 我国实验动物资源建设的问题与展望[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(12):1371-1378. DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2019.12.006 . |
ZHAO X G, LU F, CHENG P, et al. Problems and prospects of laboratory animal resources in China[J]. Bull Chin Acad Sci, 2019, 34(12):1371-1378. DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2019.12.006 . | |
2 | 陈梅丽, 刘万策. 实验动物质量检测信息资源的建设与共享[J]. 实验动物科学, 2016, 33(1):33-37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2016.01.008 . |
CHEN M L, LIU W C. Development and sharing of information resources for the quality inspection of laboratory animal[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 2016, 33(1):33-37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2016.01.008 . | |
3 | 国家标准化管理委员会. 实验动物寄生虫学等级及监测: GB14922.1—2001[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2001. |
Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Laboratory animal-Standards and monitoring for parasitology: GB 14922.1-2001[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2001. | |
4 | 国家标准化管理委员会. 实验动物微生物学等级及监测: GB14922.2—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011. |
Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Laboratory animal-Microbiological and parasitical standards and monitoring: GB 14922.2-2011[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2001. | |
5 | 科学技术部. 实验动物微生物、寄生虫学等级及监测: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022. |
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of China. Laboratory animal-Microbiological and parasitical standards and monitoring: [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2022. | |
6 | 四川省科学技术厅. 实验用猪 微生物学和寄生虫学等级及监测: DB51/T 2757—2021[S/OL]. [2024-04-10]. https://dbba.sacinfo. org. cn/stdDetail/0646d899abc0e8232b57ebf3313f61884692e30fc4e333b4c770e8c8d2a9b559.. |
Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology. Experimental pig Standards and monitoring for microbiology and parasitology: DB51/T 2757-2021[S/OL]. [2024-04-10]. https://dbba. sacinfo. org. cn/stdDetail/0646d899abc0e8232b57ebf3313f61884692e30fc4e333b4c770e8c8d2a9b559. | |
7 | 李欣忆. 我省出台"十四五"生物经济发展规划生物经济规模到2025年超1.5万亿元[EB/OL]. (2021-10-07)[2024-04-02]. https://www. sc. gov. cn/10462/10464/10797/2021/10/7/f259500c38cb4a5896e8be7d8385196f.shtml. |
LI X Y. Our province issued the "14th Five-Year Plan" bioeconomy development plan, the scale of bioeconomy will exceed 1.5 trillion yuan by 2025[EB/OL]. (2021-10-07)[2024-04-02]. https://www. sc. gov. cn/10462/10464/10797/2021/10/7/f259500c38cb4a5896e8be7d8385196f.shtml. | |
8 | 陈兵, 邹弈星, 王敬东. 基于行政许可的四川省实验动物管理现状与对策分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2024, 44(5):560-566. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.055 . |
CHEN B, ZOU Y X, W J D. Analysis on current status and countermeasures for laboratory animal management in Sichuan Province based on administrative licensing[J]. Lab Anim Comp Med, 2024, 44(5):560-566. DOI:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.055 . | |
9 | 刘丽达, 刘科亮, 何其励, 等. 2011—2015年四川省实验动物质量抽检结果分析[J]. 中国比较医学杂志, 2019, 29(2):102-105, 134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7856.2019.02.017 . |
LIU L D, LIU K L, HE Q L, et al. Results and analysis of sampling inspection for laboratory animal quality in Sichuan Province from 2011 to 2015[J]. Chin J Comp Med, 2019, 29(2):102-105, 134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7856.2019.02.017 . | |
10 | 魏杰, 黄健, 刘文菊, 等. 2017—2019年北京地区实验动物质量抽检结果分析[J]. 实验动物科学, 2021, 38(5):19-27, 58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2021.05.005 . |
WEI J, HUANG J, LIU W J, et al. Analysis of random testing results of laboratory animals in Beijing Area from 2017 to 2019[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 2021, 38(5):19-27, 58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2021.05.005 . | |
11 | 李晋文, 佟巍, 蔡鹃, 等. 猴B病毒抗体不同检测方法的比对[J]. 中国比较医学杂志, 2017, 27(7):29-33. DOI: 10.3969.j.issn.1671-7856.2017.07.006 . |
LI J W, TONG W, CAI J, et al. Comparison of different detection methods of monkey B virus antibody[J]. Chin J Comp Med, 2017, 27(7):29-33. DOI: 10.3969.j.issn.1671-7856.2017.07.006 . | |
12 | 蔡标, 戴陈伟, 李舜, 等. 实验猕猴B病毒抗体检测结果分析[J]. 安徽医学, 2018, 39(3):261-263. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2018.03.003 . |
CAI B, DAI C W, LI S, et al. Analysis on antibody testing of B virus(corcopithecine herpesvirus 1)[J]. Anhui Med J, 2018, 39(3):261-263. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2018.03.003 . | |
13 | 陈兵, 邹弈星, 姚凌云, 等. 四川省实验动物管理政策分析[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2024, 44(2): 209-213. DOI:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2023.110 . |
CHEN B, ZOU Y X, YAO L Y, et al. Research on management policies of laboratory animals in Sichuan Province[J]. Lab Anim Comp Med, 2024, 44(2): 209-213. DOI:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2023.110 . |
[1] | LIU Yishu, CAI Liping. Advances and Challenges of Using Experimental Pigs in Da Vinci Surgical Robot Training [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(6): 667-674. |
[2] | CHEN Bing, ZOU Yixing, WANG Jingdong. Analysis on Current Status and Countermeasures for Laboratory Animal Management in Sichuan Province Based on Administrative Licensing [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(5): 560-566. |
[3] | ZHAO Yong. Three Dimensions of Animal Experiment Ethics: Analysis Based on Value of Life, Animal Welfare, and Risk Prevention [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(4): 445-454. |
[4] | DENG Shaochang, LIN Danrong, LIANG Chujun, LEI Weiqiao, YANG Jinchun, ZHAO Weibo. Analysis of Institutional Characteristics and Implementation of Guangdong Province Laboratory Animals Ordinance in the Past Decade [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(4): 455-462. |
[5] | SUN Qiang. History, Current Status, Challenges and Opportunities of Laboratory Monkey Industry in China [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(4): 343-356. |
[6] | Lingzhi YU, Xiaofeng WEI, Ming LI, Zhihao KONG. Comparison of Methods between Soiled Bedding Sentinels and Exhaust Air Dust PCR for Health Monitoring of Rodent Laboratory Animals [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(3): 321-327. |
[7] | Meitong LIU, Zhang CHEN, Zhaoqiang ZHANG, Di FAN, Zhan HU, Hailing MA. Formulation of Emergency Response Plan for Laboratory Animal Biosafety Emergencies in Hunan Province [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(3): 328-334. |
[8] | Meitong LIU, Zhang CHEN, Zhaoqiang ZHANG, Di FAN, Zhan HU, Hailing MA. Investigation on Current Biosafety Management Status in Laboratory Animal Institutions in Hunan Province [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(2): 202-208. |
[9] | Bing CHEN, Yixing ZOU, Lingyun YAO, Jingdong WANG. Research on Management Policies of Laboratory Animals in Sichuan Province [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(2): 209-213. |
[10] | Yong ZHAO. Evolution and Prospects of Laboratory Animal Management: A Case Study of Shanghai's Development in the Past Decade [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(5): 492-503. |
[11] | Lianxiang GUO. Revision of Standards for Microbiological and Parasitological Grades in Laboratory Animals and Its Comparison to Foreign Standards [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(4): 339-346. |
[12] | Huan GOU, Xinying AN, Yujia TONG, Yan WANG, Shuang YANG. Analysis on the Development Status of Laboratory Animals in Japan [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(2): 194-204. |
[13] | Chongyang QI, Lin CHEN, Man AI, Hang XU, Housen ZHANG. Safety Management Countermeasures Based on the Status of Laboratory Animal Administrative Licensing in Jiangsu Province [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(1): 79-85. |
[14] | Xiaying LI, Yusheng WEI, Yonglu TIAN, Wanyong PANG. A Brief Interpretation of CCAC Guide on Humane Endpoints of Animals: 2022 Edition [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2022, 42(6): 566-571. |
[15] | Jian WANG, Jin LU, Lingyun TAO, Hongkun FU, Cheng GAO, Baojin WU, Yao LI, Yufeng TAO. Analysis on the Standardized Expression of the Accredited Ability Scope for Hematology, Blood Biochemistry and Urinalysis in Laboratory Animal Clinical Testing [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2022, 42(6): 511-517. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||