Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 251-260.DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.095
• Facilities and Management for Laboratory Animals • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Xianwen(
), LIU Lili, CHEN Ye, XU Guoheng(
)
Received:2025-06-19
Revised:2025-10-16
Online:2026-04-25
Published:2026-04-18
Contact:
XU Guoheng
CLC Number:
WU Xianwen,LIU Lili,CHEN Ye,et al. Optimization of Cage-Changing Intervals and Wood Shavings Usage for Mice During the Growth Phase in Breeding Systems[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2026, 46(2): 251-260. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.095.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.slarc.org.cn/dwyx/EN/10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.095
评分/分 Score/point | 垫料状态 Bedding condition | 粪便堆积情况 Fecal accumulation |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 干净、干燥、松散 | 无可见粪便 |
| 1 | 颜色轻微加深 | 少量(约占垫料总体积的2%) |
| 2 | 颜色加深至黄褐色 | 在一角有明显堆积 |
| 3 | 明显变色,黄褐色加深 | 堆积量约占笼盒底面积的1/3,可见黑色粪粒堆积 |
| 4 | 深褐色 | 集中堆积于一侧,约占笼盒面积的1/2 |
| 5 | 严重污染 | 分布于笼盒两角及中间区域,约占笼盒面积的2/3 |
Table 1 Cage cleanliness scoring criteria for female and male C57BL/6J mice in each group
评分/分 Score/point | 垫料状态 Bedding condition | 粪便堆积情况 Fecal accumulation |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 干净、干燥、松散 | 无可见粪便 |
| 1 | 颜色轻微加深 | 少量(约占垫料总体积的2%) |
| 2 | 颜色加深至黄褐色 | 在一角有明显堆积 |
| 3 | 明显变色,黄褐色加深 | 堆积量约占笼盒底面积的1/3,可见黑色粪粒堆积 |
| 4 | 深褐色 | 集中堆积于一侧,约占笼盒面积的1/2 |
| 5 | 严重污染 | 分布于笼盒两角及中间区域,约占笼盒面积的2/3 |
日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 21 | 8.12±0.23 | 8.89±0.28 | 8.35±0.29 | 8.37±0.34 | 6.59±0.34 | 8.38±0.50 | ||
| 24 | 9.31±0.33 | 10.01±0.56 | 9.34±0.25 | 9.81±0.41 | 8.12±0.58 | 9.38±0.47 | ||
| 27 | 11.59±0.32 | 12.79±0.30 | 11.80±0.38 | 11.48±0.33 | 11.93±0.70 | 12.07±0.49 | ||
| 30 | 14.54±0.33 | 13.86±0.52 | 14.80±0.49 | 14.31±0.41 | 13.85±0.73 | 14.41±0.43 | ||
| 33 | 16.55±0.44 | 15.76±0.41 | 17.25±0.69* | 15.06±0.39 | 16.08±0.49 | 15.68±0.23 | ||
| 36 | 18.41±0.28* | 15.98±0.42 | 18.47±0.62** | 16.18±0.42 | 17.38±0.32* | 16.22±0.33 | ||
| 39 | 19.75±0.28* | 17.15±0.41 | 19.97±0.42 | 17.13±0.39 | 18.12±0.29** | 17.03±0.23 | ||
| 42 | 20.06±0.28* | 17.39±0.23 | 20.75±0.41a** | 17.87±0.20 | 19.58±0.26** | 17.60±0.23 | ||
| 45 | 20.51±0.39** | 16.39±0.33 | 20.29±0.30** | 16.87±0.14 | 20.65±0.77** | 16.60±0.09 | ||
| 48 | 21.04±0.34** | 16.53±0.32 | 21.75±0.35** | 16.91±0.13 | 20.97±0.65** | 16.50±0.22 | ||
| 51 | 22.01±0.36** | 16.95±0.23 | 21.97±0.28** | 17.34±0.08 | 21.68±0.53** | 17.05±0.03 | ||
| 54 | 22.58±0.16** | 17.38±0.29 | 22.35±0.16** | 17.64±0.05 | 22.15±0.35** | 17.25±0.10 | ||
Table 2 Body weight changes of C57BL/6J male mice and female mice aged 21 - 54 days in different experimental groups and comparison of body weight between males and females
日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组体重/g Body weight in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 21 | 8.12±0.23 | 8.89±0.28 | 8.35±0.29 | 8.37±0.34 | 6.59±0.34 | 8.38±0.50 | ||
| 24 | 9.31±0.33 | 10.01±0.56 | 9.34±0.25 | 9.81±0.41 | 8.12±0.58 | 9.38±0.47 | ||
| 27 | 11.59±0.32 | 12.79±0.30 | 11.80±0.38 | 11.48±0.33 | 11.93±0.70 | 12.07±0.49 | ||
| 30 | 14.54±0.33 | 13.86±0.52 | 14.80±0.49 | 14.31±0.41 | 13.85±0.73 | 14.41±0.43 | ||
| 33 | 16.55±0.44 | 15.76±0.41 | 17.25±0.69* | 15.06±0.39 | 16.08±0.49 | 15.68±0.23 | ||
| 36 | 18.41±0.28* | 15.98±0.42 | 18.47±0.62** | 16.18±0.42 | 17.38±0.32* | 16.22±0.33 | ||
| 39 | 19.75±0.28* | 17.15±0.41 | 19.97±0.42 | 17.13±0.39 | 18.12±0.29** | 17.03±0.23 | ||
| 42 | 20.06±0.28* | 17.39±0.23 | 20.75±0.41a** | 17.87±0.20 | 19.58±0.26** | 17.60±0.23 | ||
| 45 | 20.51±0.39** | 16.39±0.33 | 20.29±0.30** | 16.87±0.14 | 20.65±0.77** | 16.60±0.09 | ||
| 48 | 21.04±0.34** | 16.53±0.32 | 21.75±0.35** | 16.91±0.13 | 20.97±0.65** | 16.50±0.22 | ||
| 51 | 22.01±0.36** | 16.95±0.23 | 21.97±0.28** | 17.34±0.08 | 21.68±0.53** | 17.05±0.03 | ||
| 54 | 22.58±0.16** | 17.38±0.29 | 22.35±0.16** | 17.64±0.05 | 22.15±0.35** | 17.25±0.10 | ||
日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 24 | 50.67±1.33 | 65.26±1.73 | 75.13±1.73 | 75.72±1.33 | 61.32±1.22 | 74.76±1.22 | ||
| 27 | 101.26±1.45 | 112.33±1.22 | 120.27±1.22 | 120.34±1.45 | 100.23±2.98 | 110.54±2.98 | ||
| 30 | 119.33±2.98 | 132.16±2.11 | 132.78±2.11 | 138.14±2.98 | 132.66±2.88 | 132.32±2.88 | ||
| 33 | 141.55±2.22* | 136.25±3.98 | 149.62±3.98 | 141.27±2.22 | 143.38±2.23 | 142.36±2.23 | ||
| 36 | 149.23±3.88** | 137.43±3.55 | 164.37±3.55 | 141.96±3.88 | 159.47±3.96* | 151.28±3.96 | ||
| 39 | 161.47±2.23* | 138.45±2.66 | 168.39±2.66 | 150.22±2.23 | 170.25±3.74** | 155.33±3.74 | ||
| 42 | 157.36±4.65** | 140.71±4.74 | 164.96±4.74** | 145.63±4.65 | 173.74±4.11** | 150.46±4.11 | ||
| 45 | 145.33±6.18 | 141.33±4.67 | 143.00±5.57 | 108.33±3.51 | 151.00±4.73** | 113.00±3.90 | ||
| 48 | 162.67±4.26** | 135.67±2.60 | 168.00±3.51* | 134.33±14.67 | 161.33±5.70 | 140.33±3.18 | ||
| 51 | 159.00±2.08 | 130.33±1.45 | 165.33±1.45** | 127.33±11.20 | 159.33±6.36* | 139.00±0.58 | ||
| 54 | 169.33±4.81 | 140.67±3.84 | 155.67±18.48* | 147.00±3.79 | 165.33±6.12 | 148.33±1.45 | ||
Table 3 Changes in food intake of male and female C57BL/6J mice aged 24–54 days in different experimental groups, and comparison of food intake between males and females
日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组采食量/g Food intake in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 24 | 50.67±1.33 | 65.26±1.73 | 75.13±1.73 | 75.72±1.33 | 61.32±1.22 | 74.76±1.22 | ||
| 27 | 101.26±1.45 | 112.33±1.22 | 120.27±1.22 | 120.34±1.45 | 100.23±2.98 | 110.54±2.98 | ||
| 30 | 119.33±2.98 | 132.16±2.11 | 132.78±2.11 | 138.14±2.98 | 132.66±2.88 | 132.32±2.88 | ||
| 33 | 141.55±2.22* | 136.25±3.98 | 149.62±3.98 | 141.27±2.22 | 143.38±2.23 | 142.36±2.23 | ||
| 36 | 149.23±3.88** | 137.43±3.55 | 164.37±3.55 | 141.96±3.88 | 159.47±3.96* | 151.28±3.96 | ||
| 39 | 161.47±2.23* | 138.45±2.66 | 168.39±2.66 | 150.22±2.23 | 170.25±3.74** | 155.33±3.74 | ||
| 42 | 157.36±4.65** | 140.71±4.74 | 164.96±4.74** | 145.63±4.65 | 173.74±4.11** | 150.46±4.11 | ||
| 45 | 145.33±6.18 | 141.33±4.67 | 143.00±5.57 | 108.33±3.51 | 151.00±4.73** | 113.00±3.90 | ||
| 48 | 162.67±4.26** | 135.67±2.60 | 168.00±3.51* | 134.33±14.67 | 161.33±5.70 | 140.33±3.18 | ||
| 51 | 159.00±2.08 | 130.33±1.45 | 165.33±1.45** | 127.33±11.20 | 159.33±6.36* | 139.00±0.58 | ||
| 54 | 169.33±4.81 | 140.67±3.84 | 155.67±18.48* | 147.00±3.79 | 165.33±6.12 | 148.33±1.45 | ||
日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 24 | 39.37±1.25 | 33.47±0.56 | 40.26±0.44 | 32.36±0.88 | 46.35±1.11 | 42.22±0.77 | ||
| 27 | 47.28±0.98 | 36.32±0.78 | 60.25±0.57 | 40.53±0.65 | 49.60±0.84 | 48.37±0.78 | ||
| 30 | 52.44±0.88 | 44.23±0.66 | 62.71±1.21 | 43.27±1.32 | 59.58±0.65 | 50.46±1.21 | ||
| 33 | 66.71±0.79 | 48.37±1.23 | 67.33±0.98 | 52.18±0.85 | 65.47±0.32 | 54.32±1.22 | ||
| 36 | 79.38±1.33* | 55.26±1.11 | 78.64±0.78** | 63.26±1.11 | 69.36±0.44* | 62.17±0.98 | ||
| 39 | 80.62±1.11** | 59.35±0.96 | 85.62±0.65 | 63.94±0.66 | 72.41±0.97** | 65.39±0.79 | ||
| 42 | 85.47±0.94** | 62.44±0.84 | 87.31±1.33** | 64.58±1.31 | 84.25±0.98* | 69.20±0.88 | ||
| 45 | 43.67±6.23 | 43.00±3.51 | 61.67±2.67a | 34.33±2.04 | 52.33±1.86 | 40.00±3.06 | ||
| 48 | 50.33±6.44 | 49.33±2.67 | 64.33±2.19a | 38.67±2.93 | 54.33±1.33 | 43.67±3.28 | ||
| 51 | 63.33±2.85 | 51.62±3.00 | 76.33±2.03a | 49.26±2.65 | 68.67±4.67 | 56.67±2.33 | ||
| 54 | 77.67±1.45 | 70.75±1.73 | 92.33±1.20a | 75.71±2.51 | 85.00±6.03 | 73.33±2.90 | ||
Table 4 Changes in waste load of male and female C57BL/6J mice aged 24–54 days in different experimental groups, and comparison of waste load between males and females
日龄/d Age in days/d | 3 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 3 cm group/g | 4 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 4 cm group/g | 5 cm组污物量/g Waste load in the 5 cm group/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 24 | 39.37±1.25 | 33.47±0.56 | 40.26±0.44 | 32.36±0.88 | 46.35±1.11 | 42.22±0.77 | ||
| 27 | 47.28±0.98 | 36.32±0.78 | 60.25±0.57 | 40.53±0.65 | 49.60±0.84 | 48.37±0.78 | ||
| 30 | 52.44±0.88 | 44.23±0.66 | 62.71±1.21 | 43.27±1.32 | 59.58±0.65 | 50.46±1.21 | ||
| 33 | 66.71±0.79 | 48.37±1.23 | 67.33±0.98 | 52.18±0.85 | 65.47±0.32 | 54.32±1.22 | ||
| 36 | 79.38±1.33* | 55.26±1.11 | 78.64±0.78** | 63.26±1.11 | 69.36±0.44* | 62.17±0.98 | ||
| 39 | 80.62±1.11** | 59.35±0.96 | 85.62±0.65 | 63.94±0.66 | 72.41±0.97** | 65.39±0.79 | ||
| 42 | 85.47±0.94** | 62.44±0.84 | 87.31±1.33** | 64.58±1.31 | 84.25±0.98* | 69.20±0.88 | ||
| 45 | 43.67±6.23 | 43.00±3.51 | 61.67±2.67a | 34.33±2.04 | 52.33±1.86 | 40.00±3.06 | ||
| 48 | 50.33±6.44 | 49.33±2.67 | 64.33±2.19a | 38.67±2.93 | 54.33±1.33 | 43.67±3.28 | ||
| 51 | 63.33±2.85 | 51.62±3.00 | 76.33±2.03a | 49.26±2.65 | 68.67±4.67 | 56.67±2.33 | ||
| 54 | 77.67±1.45 | 70.75±1.73 | 92.33±1.20a | 75.71±2.51 | 85.00±6.03 | 73.33±2.90 | ||
时间/d(日龄/d) Time/d (Age in days/d) | 3 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 3 cm group/points | 4 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 4 cm group/points | 5 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 5 cm group/points | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 3 (24) | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | ||
| 6 (27) | 2.30±0.57 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | ||
| 9 (30) | 2.60±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | ||
| 12 (33) | 3.30±0.57 | 3.00±0.00 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | ||
| 15 (36) | 4.30±0.57 | 4.30±0.57 | 3.60±0.57 | 3.30±0.57 | 3.00±0.00 | 3.00±0.00 | ||
| 18 (39) | 4.60±0.57 | 4.60±0.57 | 4.30±0.57 | 4.00±0.00 | 3.60±0.57 | 3.30±0.57 | ||
| 21 (42) | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 | ||
Table 5 Changes in bedding cleanliness for female and male C57BL/6J mice in different experimental groups after different durations of continuous housing
时间/d(日龄/d) Time/d (Age in days/d) | 3 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 3 cm group/points | 4 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 4 cm group/points | 5 cm组垫料清洁度/分 Bedding cleanliness in the 5 cm group/points | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | 雄性小鼠 Male mice | 雌性小鼠 Female mice | |||
| 3 (24) | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | ||
| 6 (27) | 2.30±0.57 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | ||
| 9 (30) | 2.60±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | ||
| 12 (33) | 3.30±0.57 | 3.00±0.00 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | 2.30±0.57 | ||
| 15 (36) | 4.30±0.57 | 4.30±0.57 | 3.60±0.57 | 3.30±0.57 | 3.00±0.00 | 3.00±0.00 | ||
| 18 (39) | 4.60±0.57 | 4.60±0.57 | 4.30±0.57 | 4.00±0.00 | 3.60±0.57 | 3.30±0.57 | ||
| 21 (42) | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 | ||
| [1] | 高婷婷, 孙天奇, 刘鑫鑫, 等. SPF级大鼠、小鼠IVC饲养系统玉米芯垫料使用量的探讨[J]. 实验动物科学, 2022, 39(2):59-64. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2022.02.010 . |
| GAO T T, SUN T Q, LIU X X, et al. Study on the amount of corncob bedding in IVC system of SPF rats and mice[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 2022, 39(2):59-64. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2022.02.010 . | |
| [2] | JONES T, THAWEETHAI T, MOLK D, et al. Evaluation and refinement of a spot-change–only cage management system for mice[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2022, 61(6):650-659. DOI: 10.30802/aalas-jaalas-22-000023 . |
| [3] | 李保文, 梁春南, 黎绍明. 玉米芯垫料替代刨花垫料后动物的换窝频度[J]. 实验动物科学, 2009, 26(4):65-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2009.04.018 . |
| LI B W, LIANG C N, LI S M. A scientific bedding-changing procedure by replacing wood-shavings with corn cob[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 2009, 26(4):65-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2009.04.018 . | |
| [4] | BURN C C, MASON G J. Absorbencies of six different rodent beddings: commercially advertised absorbencies are potentially misleading[J]. Lab Anim, 2005, 39(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1258/0023677052886592 . |
| [5] | BAUMANS V, VAN LOO P L P. How to improve housing conditions of laboratory animals: the possibilities of environmental refinement[J]. Vet J, 2013, 195(1):24-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.09.023 . |
| [6] | FERRECCHIA C E, JENSEN K, VAN ANDEL R. Intracage ammonia levels in static and individually ventilated cages housing C57BL/6 mice on 4 bedding substrates[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2014, 53(2):146-151. DOI: 10.1017/S0022149X12000831 . |
| [7] | 詹红微, 王福金, 刘亚奇, 等. 三种SPF小鼠垫料的比较[J]. 实验动物科学, 2012, 29(2):21-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2012.02.007 . |
| ZHAN H W, WANG F J, LIU Y Q, et al. Comparison of three beddings for specific pathogen free mice[J]. Lab Anim Sci, 2012, 29(2):21-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6179.2012.02.007 . | |
| [8] | ESKANDARANI M A, HAU J, KALLIOKOSKI O. Rapid ammonia build-up in small individually ventilated mouse cages cannot be overcome by adjusting the amount of bedding[J]. Lab Anim, 2023, 52(6):130-135. DOI: 10.1038/s41684-023-01179-0 . |
| [9] | RATUSKI A S, AMÉNDOLA L, MAKOWSKA I J, et al. Effects of temporary access to environmental enrichment on measures of laboratory mouse welfare[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65480-9 . |
| [10] | SMITH A J, LILLEY E. The role of the three rs in improving the planning and reproducibility of animal experiments[J]. Animals, 2019, 9(11):1-8. DOI: 10.3390/ani9110975 . |
| [11] | FESTING M F W. The "completely randomised" and the "randomised block" are the only experimental designs suitable for widespread use in pre-clinical research[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10:1-5. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74538-3 . |
| [12] | MÄHLER CONVENOR M, BERARD M, FEINSTEIN R, et al. FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units[J]. Lab Anim, 2014, 48(3):178-192. DOI: 10.1177/0023677213516312 . |
| [13] | TAYLOR J L, NOEL P, MICKELSEN M. Evaluation of a 16-week change cycle for ventilated mouse cages[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2019, 58(4):443-449. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000070 . |
| [14] | ROSENBAUM M D, VANDEWOUDE S, JOHNSON T E. Effects of cage-change frequency and bedding volume on mice and their microenvironment[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2009, 48(6):763-773. |
| [15] | CARPENTER K C, THURSTON S E, HOENERHOFF M J, et al. Effects of trio and pair breeding of mice on environmental parameters and nasal pathology and their implications for cage change frequency[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2020, 59(3):288-297. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000074 . |
| [16] | DOMER D A, ERICKSON R L, PETTY J M, et al. Processing and treatment of corncob bedding affects cage-change frequency for C57BL/6 mice[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2012, 51(2):162-169. DOI: 10.1177/1040638711435232 . |
| [17] | RIVERO G, CIENFUEGOS J A, RODRÍGUEZ A, et al. Sex- and depot-dependent differences in adipocyte morphology and gene expression in diet-induced obesity[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2025, 230: 112958. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112958 . |
| [18] | RANEA-ROBLES P, LUND C, SVENDSEN C, et al. Time-resolved effects of short-term overfeeding on energy balance in mice[J]. Diabetes, 2025, 74(4): 502-513. DOI: 10.2337/db24-0289 . |
| [19] | ULFHAKE B, LERAT H, HONETSCHLAGER J, et al. A multicentre study on spontaneous in-cage activity and micro-environmental conditions of IVC housed C57BL/6J mice during consecutive cycles of bi-weekly cage-change[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(5): 1-34. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267281 . |
| [20] | WILSON L A B, ZAJITSCHEK S R K, LAGISZ M, et al. Sex differences in allometry for phenotypic traits in mice indicate that females are not scaled males[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35266-6 . |
| [21] | FREYMANN J, TSAI P P, STELZER H, et al. The amount of cage bedding preferred by female BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice[J]. Lab Anim, 2015, 44(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1038/laban.659 . |
| [1] | RONG Wenshuang, NIU Yuanfei, LIU Meiting, YANG Mengyuan, CUI Shuang, MA Lina, FU Yao, WANG Lianmei, CAO Junling. Influence of Antigen Type on the Establishment of an Induced Sjögren Syndrome Mouse Model [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2026, 46(2): 178-190. |
| [2] | XU Yingtao, WANG Mengmeng, LIN Ping, CHI Haitao, WANG Yi, BAI Ying. Exosomes Treat Ischemic Stroke by Regulation of Ferroptosis Through the NRF2/SLC7A11/GPX4 Pathway in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2026, 46(1): 20-31. |
| [3] | Yisu ZHANG, Xinru LIU, Ruojie WU, Rui LIU, Hong OUYANG, Xiaohong LI. Establishment and Evaluation of Mouse Model of Pregnancy Pain-depression Comorbidity Induced by Chronic Unpredictable Stress, Complete Freund's Adjuvant and Formalin [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(3): 259-269. |
| [4] | Min LIANG, Yang GUO, Jinjin WANG, Mengyan ZHU, Jun CHI, Yanjuan CHEN, Chengji WANG, Zhilan YU, Ruling SHEN. Construction of Dmd Gene Mutant Mice and Phenotype Verification in Muscle and Immune Systems [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(1): 42-51. |
| [5] | Han LI, Xiaorui ZHANG, Chengfang ZHANG. Mechanism of Intermittent Fasting in Improving Olanzapine-induced Metabolic Disorders in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(1): 3-10. |
| [6] | LI Zifa, ZHANG Hao, REN Meng, XU Kaiyong, HU Minghui, ZHOU Miaomiao, WANG Kezhou. Protective Effect of Quercetin on Lipid Metabolism Disorder in Mice Livers Caused by Cadmium [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2021, 41(4): 305-312. |
| [7] | LEI Shan, LIU Qiang, HUANG Wei-jin, WANG You-chun. Influence of Strain, Gender and Hair Coat of Mice on Establishing Bioluminescent Imaging Pseudovirus Mouse Model [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2019, 39(6): 423-428. |
| [8] | YANG Hua, ZHAO Ya-Juan, OU Qiang. Establishment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Fibrosis Model and Expression of Inflammatory Factors in Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2017, 37(1): 20-24. |
| [9] | XIAO Nan1,ZHAO Wei2, BA Cai-feng2, SU Rong-jian1, SU Yu-hong1,3. Study on Gene Mutation and Muscles Subtypes’Expression in DMD Model Mice [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2008, 28(6): 356-360. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||