Establishment of Preeclampsia Model in Goat and Evaluation on Maternal Biological Characteristics

doi:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2023.036

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective Establish an animal model of preeclampsia in goats, collect data on various physiological indicators and maternal biological characteristics of the disease model to compare with clinical feature of the disease in humans, provide reference for the prevention and treatment of preeclampsia in humans. Methods Twenty-three goats bred in Chongming district were divided into three groups: Control group, no surgical procedure was performed on animals of this group; sham group, ewes in this group underwent the sham operation on the 100±5th day of gestation, and only the uterine artery was exposed and dissociated; surgical group, a silver vascular clamp was clipped on one side of the uterine body artery of the ewe to narrow the inner diameter of the artery at the same gestation period (100±5) days. Heart rate and hindlimb blood pressure were continuously monitored in control and surgical ewes from 100 to 140 d of gestation, and blood flow data within the lateral branches of the uterine arteries of ewes in the sham group were collected using a hemodynamometer in combination with a hemodynamic probe and an animal physiological signal collector, as well as changes in blood flow within the uterine arteries in the lateral branches of the uterine arteries of the surgical group before and after placement of vascular clips in the surgical ewes. At the expected date of delivery, jugular vein blood was taken from ewes for routine blood test, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and blood ion analysis; urine was also collected from ewes in each group for analysis of urinary protein and urinary creatinine. All experimental groups were subjected to cesarean section on the 140±5th day of gestation in ewes, and then liver, kidney, uterus and placenta tissues were taken from ewes in each group and stained with HE for pathological observation. Results After 15 minutes of preeclampsia modeling surgery, blood flow volume remained stable in the vessel stenosis segment and the volume differential was relatively reduced in comparison to the control group and sham group (P＜0.05，P＜0.01). Compared with the control group, the ewes in the surgical group showed prenatal changes such as increased serum osmolality, decreased hemoglobin, increased blood glucose and urea nitrogen values, as well as increased levels of calcium, sodium, and chloride ions (all P<0.05) and proteinuria, with urinary creatinine and urinary protein-creatinine ratios were significantly higher than those in the control group and sham group (all P<0.05). The elastic lamina of the uterine body arteries on the operated side of the animals in the surgical group was thicker than that on the opposite side, but the structure was loose. The placenta on the operated side showed pathological changes such as cell interstitial swelling and inflammatory cell infiltration. The above physiological index characteristics were more consistent with the clinical features of human preeclampsia disease. Conclusion In this experiment, we successfully constructed a goat preeclampsia model and obtained data on relevant physiological indexes of this model, which further verified the correlation between preeclampsia disease and uterine artery lesions.

Key words: Preeclampsia, Animal model, Blood flow analysis, Biological characteristics, Goat

CLC Number:

R-332

Jin LU,Jian WANG,Lian ZHU,et al. Establishment of Preeclampsia Model in Goat and Evaluation on Maternal Biological Characteristics[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2023, 43(4): 371-380. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2023.036.

Figures/Tables 6

Figure 1 Anterior exposure of uterine arteries and the position of the silver clamp placement on uterine body arteryNote：A， Anterior exposure of uterine arteries （UA， uterine artery；UB， uterine body；R， right uterine body artery；L， left uterine body artery；SC， placement of silver clamp）； B， Uterine body artery been partially closed by silver clamp.

Figure 2 Blood flow， blood pressure and heart rate of pregnant goats after preeclampsia modellingNote：A， Blood flow changes of uterine body artery； B， Changes of hind limb diastolic blood pressure；C， Changes of hind limb pulse pressure； D， Change of heart rate （BPM， beat per min）. In control group （n=11）， no surgical operation was done on animals； in sham group （n=4）， sham surgery was performed on the 100th day of gestation， to be specific， only their uterine body arteries were exposed and freed； in surgical group （n=8）， preeclampsia modeling was performed by placing silver vascular clamps on one of the uterine body arteries of the animals on the 100th day of gestation to close their internal diameters partially. For comparison between groups， *P<0.05， **P<0.01， ***P<0.001， ****P<0.000 1.

Table 1 Comparison of blood routine between groups in preeclampsia goat model

项目 Item	手术组（n=8） Surgical group (n=8)		对照组（n=11） Control group (n=11)
项目 Item	术后5 d Postoperation 5 d	产前 Before parturition	对照组（n=11） Control group (n=11)
白细胞计数/(10³·μL^-1) White blood cell count/(10³·μL^-1)	38.26±2.81	34.00±2.99	40.62±1.70
淋巴细胞百分比/% Lymphocyte/%	58.68±2.28	58.42±4.22	60.94±2.05
中间细胞百分比/% Intermediate cell/%	7.20±1.07	7.60±1.09	6.61±0.73
粒细胞百分比/% Granulocyte/%	34.12±1.77	33.98±3.18	32.45±1.63
淋巴细胞计数/(10³·μL^-1) Lymphocyte count/(10³·μL^-1)	22.50±1.86	20.13±2.85	24.81±1.44
粒细胞计数/(10³·μL^-1) Granulocyte count/(10³·μL^-1)	12.90±0.81	11.30±0.64	13.06±0.68
红细胞计数/(10⁶·μL^-1) Red blood cell count/(10⁶·μL^-1)	1.14±0.14	0.65±0.04^*	1.58±0.17
血红蛋白计数/(g·L^-1) haemoglobin count/(g·L^-1)	101.40±4.24	87.75±4.71^*	117.27±5.32
血细胞压积/% Packed cell volume/%	4.52±0.62	2.50±0.16^*	6.49±0.76
平均红细胞压积/fL Mean corpuscular volume/fL	40.18±0.31	39.53±0.30^*	41.16±0.30
平均红细胞血红蛋白量/pg Mean corpuscular hemoglobin/pg	94.00±10.30	135.18±6.02^****	77.99±4.33
平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度/(g·L^-1) Mean corpusular hemoglobin concerntration/(g·L^-1)	2 397±286	3 526±154^****	1 924±118
红细胞分别宽度变异系数/% coefficient variation of red blood cell volume distribution width/%	17.26±0.61	16.33±0.69	17.41±0.43
中间细胞计数/(10³·μL^-1) Intermediate cell count/(10³·μL^-1)	2.58±0.44	2.40±0.22	2.99±0.34

Figure 3 Blood and urinary biochemical results of preeclampsia modeling goat before parturitionNote：A， Blood glucose； B， Renal functional indicators； C， Serum iron indicators （PHOS， phosphate； Ca， calcium； Na， Sodium； K， potassium； Na/K， sodium potassium ratio； Cl， chlorine； OSM CALC， osmotic pressure）； D， Urinary creatinine and urinary total protein； E， Creatinine/protein ratio. In the control group （n=11）， no surgical operation was done on animals； in sham group （n=4）， sham surgery was performed on the 100th day of gestation，to be specific， only their uterine body arteries were exposed and freed；and in surgical group （n=8）， preeclampsia modeling was performed by placing silver vascular clamps on one of the uterine body arteries of the animals on the 100th day of gestation to close some of their internal diameters. Comparison between groups， *P<0.05， **P<0.01， ***P<0.001， ****P<0.000 1.

Figure 4 Pathologic changes in the placenta on the operated and non-operated side during parturition in goats after preeclampsia modeling（HE staining）Note：A， Normal placenta of ewes in control group （×1.1， the blue squares are the sampling sites for figure B and C ）； B， Trophoblasts of normal placenta in control group （×16.9）； C， Villous stroma of normal placenta in control group （×27.2）； D， Surgical side placenta of ewes in surgical group （×1.1， the blue squares are the sampling sites for figure E and F ）； E， Trophoblasts of surgical side placenta of ewes in surgical group （×28.7）； F， Villous stroma of surgical side placenta of ewes in surgical group （×34.3）. Scale bars of figure A and D are 1 000 μm. Proportional scales of figure B， C， E and F are 50 μm.

Figure 5 Comparison of the appearance and pathology of the uterine body arteries on surgical and non-surgical side of the uterus at the time of parturition in pregnant goats after preeclampsia modelingNote：A， Schematic diagram of the uterus and uterine arteries of ewes on the 140th day of gestation （silver clips were placed on one side of the uterine body arteries）； B-D， HE-stained histopathologic sections of the uterine body arteries （B， uterine arteries of the nonsurgical side； C， uterine arteries proximal to the surgical side； E， uterine arteries distal from the surgical side）. The scale bars figure B-D are 50 μm.

References 25

1	FILIPEK A, JUREWICZ E. Preeclampsia - a disease of pregnant women[J]. Postepy Biochem, 2018, 64(4):232-229. DOI: 10.18388/pb.2018_146 .
2	IVES C W, SINKEY R, RAJAPREYAR I, et al. Preeclampsia—pathophysiology and clinical presentations: JACC state-of-the-art review[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020, 76(14):1690-1702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.014 .
3	CRAICI I M, WAGNER S J, WEISSGERBER T L, et al. Advances in the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia and related podocyte injury[J]. Kidney Int, 2014, 86(2):275-285. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.17 .
4	ROBERTS J M, KING T L, BARTON J R, et al. Care plan for individuals at risk for preeclampsia: shared approach to education, strategies for prevention, surveillance, and follow-up[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2023: S0002-9378(23)00260. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.023 .
5	GATFORD K L, ANDRAWEERA P H, ROBERTS C T, et al. Animal models of preeclampsia: causes, consequences, and interventions[J]. Hypertension, 2020, 75(6):1363-1381. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14598 .
6	LI J, LAMARCA B, RECKELHOFF J F. A model of preeclampsia in rats: the reduced uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP) model[J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2012, 303(1): H1-H8. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00117.2012 .
7	肖仲琳, 杨青, 张键, 等. 子痫前期动物模型的研究进展[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2016, 43(6): 563-569. DOI: 10.16476/j.pibb.2016.0011
	XIAO Z L, YANG Q, ZHANG J, et al. Research progress of animal models of preeclampsia[J]. Prog Biochem Biophys, 2016, 43(6): 563-569. DOI: 10.16476/j.pibb.2016.0011 .
8	UZUN M, GENCER M, TURKON H, et al. Effects of melatonin on blood pressure, oxidative stress and placental expressions of TNFα, IL-6, VEGF and sFlt-1 in RUPP rat model of preeclampsia[J]. Arch Med Res, 2017, 48(7):592-598. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2017.08.007 .
9	SHI M T, YANG X F, SUN L, et al. Comparison of different modified operations in the reduced uteroplacental perfusion pressure rat model of preeclampsia[J]. J Reprod Immunol, 2023, 156:103815. DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103815 .
10	BAKRANIA B A, GEORGE E M, GRANGER J P. Animal models of preeclampsia: investigating pathophysiology and therapeutic targets[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 226(2S): S973-S987. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.025 .
11	PEAKER M. Gestation period and litter size in the goat[J]. Br Vet J, 1978, 134(4):379-383. DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)33441-3 .
12	SMITH M C, SHERMAN D M. Goat Medicine[M]. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Blackwell Pub Professional, 2009.
13	吴正一. 实验外科技术: 羊的全身麻醉方法[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2000, 9(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7248.2000.01.015 .
	WU Z Y. Techniques in experimental surgery—general anesthesia of the goat[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2000, 9(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7248.2000.01.015 .
14	PRACTICE A C O O. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2002, 77(1):67-75.
15	JACKSON P, COCKCROFT P. Clinical examination of farm animals[M]. Hoboken: Blackwell Science Ltd, 2002.
16	杨怡珂, 漆洪波. 美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)"妊娠期高血压和子痫前期指南2019版"要点解读(第一部分)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2019, 35(8):895-899. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2019080112 .
	YANG Y K, QI H B. Interpretation of the American college of obstetricians and gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines for pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia (2019 edition) (part I)[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 35(8):895-899. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2019080112 .
17	PHIPPS E A, THADHANI R, BENZING T, et al. Pre-eclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2019, 15(5):275-289. DOI: 10.1038/s41581-019-0119-6 .
18	MILLER D, MOTOMURA K, GALAZ J, et al. Cellular immune responses in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia[J]. J Leukoc Biol, 2021, 111(1):237-260. DOI: 10.1002/JLB.5RU1120-787RR .
19	JUNG E, ROMERO R, YEO L, et al. The etiology of preeclampsia[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 226(2S): S844-S866. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1356 .
20	周晶, 严国锋, 罗章源, 等. 子痫前期大鼠模型建立及相关指标监测[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2015, 35(6): 448-452. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5817.2015.06.004 .
	ZHOU J, YAN G F, LUO Z Y, et al. Establishment of preeclampsia model in rat and detection on related indicators[J]. Lab Anim Comp Med, 2015, 35(6): 448-452. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5817.2015.06.004 .
21	PAAUW N D, JOLES J A, SPRADLEY F T, et al. Exposure to placental ischemia impairs postpartum maternal renal and cardiac function in rats[J]. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 2017, 312(5): R664-R670. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00510.2016 .
22	CORDINA M, BHATTI S, FERNANDEZ M, et al. Maternal hemoglobin at 27-29 weeks' gestation and severity of pre-eclampsia[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2015, 28(13):1575-1580. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.961006 .
23	Anon. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 135(6): e237-e260. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891 .
24	HEIDA K Y, BOTS M L, DE GROOT C J, et al. Cardiovascular risk management after reproductive and pregnancy-related disorders: a Dutch multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline[J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2016, 23(17):1863-1879. DOI: 10.1177/2047487316659573 .
25	RICHARDS C, SESPEREZ K, CHHOR M, et al. Characterisation of cardiac health in the reduced uterine perfusion pressure model and a 3D cardiac spheroid model, of preeclampsia[J]. Biol Sex Differ, 2021, 12(1):31. DOI: 10.1186/s13293-021-00376-1 .

[1]	LIU Yayi, JIA Yunfeng, ZUO Yiming, ZHANG Junping, LÜ Shichao. Progress and Evaluation of Animal Model of Heart Qi-Yin Deficiency Syndrome [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 411-421.
[2]	ZHAO Xin, WANG Chenxi, SHI Wenqing, LOU Yuefen. Advances in the Application of Zebrafish in the Research of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Mechanisms and Drug Development [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(4): 422-431.
[3]	PAN Yicong, JIANG Wenhong, HU Ming, QIN Xiao. Optimization of Surgical Procedure and Efficacy Evaluation of Aortic Calcification Model in Rats with Chronic Kidney Disease [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(3): 279-289.
[4]	CHEN Yuhan, CHEN Jinling, LI Xin, OU Yanhua, WANG Si, CHEN Jingyi, WANG Xingyi, YUAN Jiali, DUAN Yuanyuan, YANG Zhongshan, NIU Haitao. Analysis of Animal Models of Myasthenia Gravis Based on Its Clinical Characteristics in Chinese and Western Medicine [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(2): 176-186.
[5]	LIAN Hui, JIANG Yanling, LIU Jia, ZHANG Yuli, XIE Wei, XUE Xiaoou, LI Jian. Construction and Evaluation of a Rat Model of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(2): 130-146.
[6]	LUO Shixiong, ZHANG Sai, CHEN Hui. Research Progress in Establishment and Evaluation of Common Asthma Animal Models [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(2): 167-175.
[7]	WANG Biying, LU Jiashuo, ZAN Guiying, CHEN Ruosong, CHAI Jingrui, LIU Jinggen, WANG Yujun. Establishment Methods and Application Progress of Rodent Models for Drug Addiction [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(2): 158-166.
[8]	FEI Bin, GUO Wenke, GUO Jianping. Research Progress on Animal Models for Hernia Diseases and New Hernia Repair Materials [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2025, 45(1): 55-66.
[9]	YANG Jiahao, DING Chunlei, QIAN Fenghua, SUN Qi, JIANG Xusheng, CHEN Wen, SHEN Mengwen. Research Progress on Animal Models of Sepsis-Related Organ Injury [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(6): 636-644.
[10]	SUN Xiaorong, SU Dan, GUI Wenjuan, CHEN Yue. Establishment and Evaluation of a Moderate-to-Severe Knee Osteoarthritis Model in Rats Induced by Surgery [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(6): 597-604.
[11]	TIAN Fang, PAN Bin, SHI Jiayi, XU Yanyi, LI Weihua. Advances in Development of PM_2.5-Exposed Animal Models and Their Application in Reproductive Toxicity Research [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(6): 626-635.
[12]	ZHAO Xiaona, WANG Peng, YE Maoqing, QU Xinkai. Establishment of a New Hyperglycemic Obesity Cardiac Dysfunction Mouse Model with Triacsin C [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(6): 605-612.
[13]	TU Yingxin, JI Yilan, WANG Fei, YANG Dongming, WANG Dongdong, SUN Zhixin, DAI Yuexin, WANG Yanji, Guanghan KAN, WU Bin, ZHAO Deming, YANG Lifeng. Evaluation of Simulated Weightlessness Model of Hindlimb Unloading Miniature Pigs and Their Tissue Damage [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(5): 475-486.
[14]	HUANG Dongyan, WU Jianhui. Establishment Methods and Application Evaluation of Animal Models in Reproductive Toxicology Research [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(5): 550-559.
[15]	ZHENG Yiqing, DENG Yasheng, FAN Yanping, LIANG Tianwei, HUANG Hui, LIU Yonghui, NI Zhaobing, LIN Jiang. Application Analysis of Animal Models for Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Based on Data Mining [J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2024, 44(4): 405-418.