Construction and Practice of AI-Based Triadic Interactive Teaching Model for Surgical Animal Surgery

doi:10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.080

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective In the context of the digital transformation of education, this study aims to construct a triadic interactive teaching model for surgical animal surgery in clinical medicine using modern information technology. It explores the effectiveness of different teaching methods in improving students' practical skills, aseptic awareness, and teamwork abilities, providing a reference for the reform of clinical practice education. Methods A quasi-experimental research design was adopted. A total of 80 students from the eight-year clinical medicine program at Nanjing University were selected, including the Class of 2020 (control group, n=40) and the Class of 2021 (experimental group, n=40). The control group received traditional teaching methods, while the experimental group implemented the "Teacher-Student-AI" triadic interactive teaching model. This model utilized a smart teaching platform for personalized pre-class preparation, as well as data-driven post-class review and feedback throughout the entire teaching process. The "assessment indicators and scoring criteria for the surgical animal surgery course" were used to evaluate teaching effectiveness, with independent samples t-tests used for statistical analysis. Results Pre-course assessments revealed no statistically significant differences in baseline theoretical knowledge or practical skills between the two groups (P>0.05). Upon completion of the course, the experimental group achieved higher scores than the control group across three key dimensions: practical skills (47.98±1.34 vs 46.92±2.51, P=0.022), aseptic awareness (17.84±1.16 vs 16.94±2.29, P=0.029), and teamwork (16.82±1.44 vs 15.95±1.22, P=0.004). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in the scores for humane care awareness between the two groups (8.24±0.70 vs 8.16±0.53, P=0.589). Conclusion The AI-based triadic interactive teaching model can, to some extent, address the limitations of traditional surgical animal surgery education. It plays a positive role in enhancing medical students' surgical skills, aseptic awareness, and collaborative abilities. This model facilitates the transition from traditional to personalized teaching and offers a practical framework for the digital reform of clinical practice education.

Key words: Surgical animal surgery, Triadic interaction, Digitalization of education, Clinical medical education

CLC Number:

G642

MAO Kaikai,LI Xiu,ZHOU Chen,et al. Construction and Practice of AI-Based Triadic Interactive Teaching Model for Surgical Animal Surgery[J]. Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine, 2026, 46(2): 288-296. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2025.080.

Figures/Tables 5

References 20

[1]	焦海涛, 庞建会, 潘静, 等. 将医学人文融入外科动物实验的教学体会[J]. 承德医学院学报, 2023, 40(3):253-255. DOI: 10.15921/j.cnki.cyxb.2023.03.007 .
	JIAO H T, PANG J H, PAN J, et al. Teaching experience of integrating medical humanities into surgical animal experiments[J]. J Chengde Med Univ, 2023, 40(3):253-255. DOI: 10.15921/j.cnki.cyxb.2023.03.007 .
[2]	朱大卫. 外科动物手术学实验课教学实践与心得探析[J]. 现代职业教育, 2020(33):194-195.
	ZHU D W. Teaching practice and experience of experimental course of surgical animal surgery[J]. Mod Vocat Educ, 2020(33):194-195.
[3]	王林楠, 杨曦. 外科动物手术学本科生教学模式改革的探索[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2022, 7(12):196-198. DOI: 10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202212055 .
	WANG L N, YANG X. Exploration on the teaching reform of undergraduates in the animal surgery[J]. Clin Res Pract, 2022, 7(12):196-198. DOI: 10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202212055 .
[4]	耿丹丹, 张展翅, 王磊, 等. 自主学习模式在局部解剖学教学中的探索[J]. 解剖学杂志, 2020, 43(5): 448-450. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1633.2020.05.022 .
	GENG D D, ZHANG Z C, WANG L, et al. Exploration of self-directed learning in regional anatomy teaching[J]. Chin J Anat, 2020, 43(5): 448-450. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1633.2020.05.022 .
[5]	朱磊, 闫敏, 孙璟川, 等. 评价与反馈法在提高«外科手术学基础»课程授课效果中的探究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2020, 19(12):1422-1426. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20191206-00336 .
	ZHU L, YAN M, SUN J C, et al. Exploration on evaluation and feedback method in improving the teaching effect of Basics of Operative Surgery [J]. Chin J Med Educ Res, 2020, 19(12):1422-1426. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20191206-00336 .
[6]	SOONG T K, HO C M. Artificial intelligence in medical OSCEs: reflections and future developments[J]. Adv Med Educ Pract, 2021, 12:167-173. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S287926 .
[7]	刘意抒, 蔡丽萍. 实验猪在达芬奇手术机器人培训中的应用进展及挑战[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2024, 44(6): 667-674. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.075 .
	LIU Y S, CAI L P. Advances and challenges of using experimental pigs in da vinci surgical robot training[J]. Lab Anim Comp Med, 2024, 44(6): 667-674. DOI: 10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2024.075 .
[8]	张雨欣, 王小根. AIGC的智能教育应用: 智能教学系统的功能升级[J]. 中国医学教育技术, 2024, 38(3):311-318. DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202403009 .
	ZHANG Y X, WANG X G. Intelligent education application of AIGC: Functional upgrade of the intelligent teaching system[J]. China Med Educ Technol, 2024, 38(3):311-318. DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202403009 .
[9]	饶凯平, 章凡. 智慧教育中智能交互助教学伴体系构建研究[J]. 中国教育技术装备, 2023(21):126-131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-489X.2023.21.126 .
	RAO K P, ZHANG F. Research on the construction of intelligent mutual aid teaching partner system in wisdom education[J]. China Educ Technol Equip, 2023(21):126-131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-489X.2023.21.126 .
[10]	王莉, 奚丽君. 知识图谱赋能教学的逻辑框架及其在医学教育中的实践探索[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2024, 45(9): 96-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6036.2024.09.016 .
	WANG L, XI L J. The logical framework of knowledge graph empowering teaching and its practical exploration in medical education[J]. J Med Intell, 2024, 45(9): 96-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6036.2024.09.016 .
[11]	刘祥. 面向精细化诊疗流程的手术知识图谱构建方法研究及应用[D]. 重庆:重庆邮电大学, 2022. DOI: 10.27675/d.cnki.gcydx.2022.001188 .
	LIU X. Research and application of surgical knowledge graph construction method for refined diagnosis and treatment process[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2022. DOI: 10.27675/d.cnki.gcydx.2022.001188 .
[12]	李明娟, 刘蕊萍, 杨丽. 生成式人工智能赋能学习情景与教学设计研究[J]. 电脑知识与技术, 2024, 20(25):27-30. DOI: 10.14004/j.cnki.ckt.2024.1376 .
	LI M J, LIU R P, YANG L. Research on generative artificial intelligence empowering learning scenarios and instructional design[J]. Comput Knowl Technol, 2024, 20(25):27-30. DOI: 10.14004/j.cnki.ckt.2024.1376 .
[13]	蒲清平, 王雪婷. 人工智能助力学情分析的理论框架与实践路径[J]. 大学教育科学, 2024, 15(3): 31-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0717.2024.03.04 .
	PU Q P, WANG X T. The theoretical framework and practical path of learning situation analysis assisted by artificial intelligence[J]. Univ Educ Sci, 2024, 15(3): 31-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0717.2024.03.04 .
[14]	章均, 何波, 何大维, 等. "互联网+"在外科手术学基础教学和形成性评价中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2016, 15(7):734-737. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2016.07.019 .
	ZHANG J, HE B, HE D W, et al. Discussion about ＂Internet plus＂ used in teaching of basis of surgical operation and formative eval uation[J]. Chin J Med Educ Res, 2016, 15(7):734-737. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2016.07.019 .
[15]	刘瑶瑶, 罗科宇, 吕雪, 等. MOOC+SPOC教学在«外科手术学基础»教学中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(8):1214-1217. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20211103-01388 .
	LIU Y Y, LUO K Y, LÜ X, et al. Application of the teaching model of massive open online course combined with small private online course in the teaching of Fundamentals of Surgery [J]. Chin J Med Educ Res, 2023, 22(8):1214-1217. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20211103-01388 .
[16]	夏青青, 马萍, 潘昱, 等. 基于 "SPOC+翻转课堂" 教学模式的人体解剖学智慧课堂的构建[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2024, 16(16): 14-17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2024.16.004 .
	XIA Q Q, MA P, PAN Y, et al. Construction of human anatomy smart classroom based on ＂SPOC+Flipped classroom＂ teaching model[J]. China Continuing Med Educ, 2024, 16(16): 14-17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2024.16.004 .
[17]	朱寿鸿, 汪国翔, 吴德坤, 等. 细化评分标准在外科基本技能考评中的应用研究[J]. 中国医学教育技术, 2020, 34(2):237-239, 247. DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202002030 .
	ZHU S H, WANG G X, WU D K, et al. Application of refined scoring standard in basic skills evaluation of surgery[J]. China Med Educ Technol, 2020, 34(2):237-239, 247. DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202002030 .
[18]	刘成程, 寻萌, 韩蕾, 等. 人工智能推动医学教育改革的现状与展望[J]. 基础医学教育, 2024, 26(10):890-894. DOI: 10.13754/j.issn2095-1450.2024.10.15 .
	LIU C C, XUN M, HAN L, et al. Current status and prospects of AI-driven reforms in medical education[J]. Basic Med Educ, 2024, 26(10):890-894. DOI: 10.13754/j.issn2095-1450.2024.10.15 .
[19]	宋涛, 金朝阳, 唐文波, 等. 基于在线互动教学云平台的PBL教学模式在高校外科手术学基础教学中的应用[J]. 牡丹江医学院学报, 2024, 45(4):171-175. DOI: 10.13799/j.cnki.mdjyxyxb.2024.04.012 .
	SONG T, JIN Z Y, TANG W B, et al. Application of PBL teaching mode based on online interactive teaching cloud platform in the basic teaching of surgery in colleges and universities[J]. J Mudanjiang Med Univ, 2024, 45(4):171-175. DOI: 10.13799/j.cnki.mdjyxyxb.2024.04.012 .
[20]	何茂章, 王姝妹, 丁瑞培, 等. 基于新医科与AI技术融合的医学教学模式探讨[J]. 湘南学院学报(医学版), 2024, 26(3):63-66. DOI: 10.16500/j.cnki.1673-498x.2024.03.015 .
	HE M Z, WANG S M, DING R P, et al. Discussion on medical teaching mode based on the integration of new medicine and AI technology[J]. J Xiangnan Univ Med Sci, 2024, 26(3):63-66. DOI: 10.16500/j.cnki.1673-498x.2024.03.015 .

测试指标 Test indicator	基本理论知识（100分）/分 Basic theoretical knowledge(100 points)/point	基本外科操作技能水平（100分）/分 Basic surgical operational skill level(100 points)/point	操作技能（50分）/分 Operational skill (50 points)/point	无菌观念（20分）/分 Aseptic awareness (20 points)/point	团队协作（20分）/分 Teamwork (20 points)/point	爱伤观念（10分）/分 Humane care awareness (10 points)/point
对照组 Control group	86.33±3.08	89.32±4.44	46.92±2.51	16.94±2.29	15.95±1.22	8.16±0.53
试验组 Experimental group	87.16±4.80	90.29±4.42	47.98±1.34	17.84±1.16	16.82±1.44	8.24±0.70
t	-0.920	-0.982	-2.344	-2.240	-2.937	-0.543
P	0.361	0.329	0.022^*	0.029^*	0.004^**	0.589

测试指标 Test indicator	基本理论知识（100分）/分 Basic theoretical knowledge(100 points)/point	基本外科操作技能水平（100分）/分 Basic surgical operational skill level(100 points)/point	操作技能（50分）/分 Operational skill (50 points)/point	无菌观念（20分）/分 Aseptic awareness (20 points)/point	团队协作（20分）/分 Teamwork (20 points)/point	爱伤观念（10分）/分 Humane care awareness (10 points)/point
对照组 Control group	86.33±3.08	89.32±4.44	46.92±2.51	16.94±2.29	15.95±1.22	8.16±0.53
试验组 Experimental group	87.16±4.80	90.29±4.42	47.98±1.34	17.84±1.16	16.82±1.44	8.24±0.70
t	-0.920	-0.982	-2.344	-2.240	-2.937	-0.543
P	0.361	0.329	0.022^*	0.029^*	0.004^**	0.589